Metaphors in the Social Sciences: Making Use and Making Sense of Them

  • Sabine Maasen
Chapter
Part of the Origins book series (ORIN, volume 1)

Abstract

Ever since scholarly discourse has concerned itself with metaphors the latter have been recognized as something disturbing the order of things and/or the order of words designating the former. Foremost exemplars of the improper, metaphors toy around with correct meanings and conventionalized usages: at best, one holds that they have no relation to true knowledge at all and lets them pass because of their merely decorous role. More often, however, suspecting the worst, one is afraid of their outright deceptive effects. Conventional genealogy cites Aristotle as forebearer for this basic fear and the rejection of metaphors within proper discourse — a philosophy James J. Bono pointedly refers to as the philosophy of a land dweller: suffused with tropes of solidity this philosophy is a “terra firma upon which stable things and determinate, literal, proper meanings can be anchored” (Bono 1997, 9) — to this landscape metaphors simply do not belong.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. ANDERSON, P.W., K. ARROW & D. PINES, The Economy as an Evolving Complex System, Redwood City (Ca), Addison-Wesley, 1988.Google Scholar
  2. BARNETT, W.A., A.J. GEWEKE, K. SHELL, Economic Complexity: Chaos, Sunspots, Bubbles, and Nonlinearities, New York, Cambridge Univ. Press, 1989.Google Scholar
  3. BARNETT, W., P. CHEN, Dynamic Econometric Modeling, New York, Cambridge University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
  4. BENHABIB, J., RICHARD D. Day, “Rational Choice and Erratic Behavior”, Review of Economic Studies, 48 (1981).Google Scholar
  5. BERGGREN, Douglas, “The Use and Abuse of Metaphor (Part I and II)”, Review of Metaphysics, 16 (1963), pp. 237–258, 450–472.Google Scholar
  6. BLACK, Max, Models and Metaphors: Studies in Language and Philosophy, Ithaca (N.Y.), Cornell University Press, 1962.Google Scholar
  7. BONO, James J. (1997), “Metaphor and Scientific Change: From Representational to Performative Understandings of Metaphor and Scientific Practice”, paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Society for the Social Study of Science, October 1997, Tuczon, Arizona.Google Scholar
  8. BONO, James J., “Science, Discourse, and Literature: The Role/Rule of Metaphor in Science”, in: Stuart PETERFREUND (ed.), Literature and Science: Theory and Practice, Boston, Northeastern University Press, 1990, pp. 59–89Google Scholar
  9. BRIGGS, John, F. DAVID PEAT, Turbulent Mirror: An Illustrated Guide to Chaos Theory and the Science of Wholeness, New York, Harper & Row, 1989.Google Scholar
  10. BROMME, Rainer, “Beyond One’s Own Perspective: The Psychology of Cognitive Interdisciplinarity,” in: Peter Weingart & Nico Stehr (eds.), Practicing Interdisciplinarity, Toronto, Toronto University Press, forthcoming.Google Scholar
  11. BURKE, Kenneth, “Four Master Tropes,”Kenyon Review, 3 (1941), pp. 421–438.Google Scholar
  12. BURLINGAME, Gary M., Addie FUHRIMAN, Karl A. BARNUM, “Group Therapy as a Nonlinear Dynamical System: Analysis of Therapeutic Communication for Chaotic Patterns”, in: Frederick David ABRAHAM & Albert R. GILGEN (eds.), Chaos Theory in Psychology, Westport, Greenwood Press, 1995, pp. 87–105.Google Scholar
  13. CACIOPPO, J.T. & L.G. TASSINARY, “Centenary of William James’ Principles of Psychology: From the Chaos of Mental Life to the Sciences of Psychology”, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 16 (1990).Google Scholar
  14. CHAMBERLAIN, Linda, “Strange Attractors in Patterns of Family Interaction”, in: Robin ROBERTSON & Allan COMBS (eds.), Chaos Theory in Psychology and the Life Sciences, Mahwah (N.J.), Erlbaum, 1995, pp. 267–274.Google Scholar
  15. COHEN, Ted, “Metaphor and the Cultivation of Intimacy”, Critical Inquiry, 3 (1978), pp. 3–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. CREEDY, John & Vance L. MARTIN, “Introduction and Outline”, in: John CREEDY & Vance L. MARTIN (eds.).Chaos and Nonlinear Models in Economics: Theory and Applications, Aldershot-Brookfield, Edward Elgar, 1996.Google Scholar
  17. DAVIDSON, Donald, “What Metaphors Mean”, in: Mark JOHNSON (ed.), Philosophical Perspectives on Metaphor, Minneapolis, Univ. of Minnesota Press, 1981.Google Scholar
  18. DAY, Richard, “The Emergence of Chaos from Classical Economic Growth”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 5 (1983), pp. 201–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. DEBATIN, Bernhard, Die Rationalität der Metapher. Eine sprachphilosophische und kommunikationstheoretische Untersuchung, Berlin-New York, Walter de Gruyter, 1995.Google Scholar
  20. DE COSTER, G.P. & D.W. MITCHELL, “Dynamic Implications of Chaotic Monetary Policy”, Journal of Macroeconomics, 14 (1992), pp. 267–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. EDWARDS, Derek, Discourse and Cognition, London, Thousand Oaks; New Dehli, Sage, 1997.Google Scholar
  22. FOUCAULT, Michel, Die Ordnung des Diskurses, Frankfurt-Berlin-Wien, Ullstein, 1974.Google Scholar
  23. FREEMAN, Walter, “Foreword”, in: Robin ROBERTSON & Allan COMBS (eds.), Chaos Theory in Psychology and the Life Sciences, Mahwah, (N.J.), Erlbaum, 1995, pp. ix–xi.Google Scholar
  24. GARFINKEL, Harold, Studies in Ethnomethodology, Englewood Cliffs, 1967.Google Scholar
  25. GIOVACCHINI, Peter L., “Eroticism and Chaos”, Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, 18 (1990), pp. 5–17.Google Scholar
  26. GLEICK, James, Chaos: Making of a New Science, New York, Penguin, 1987.Google Scholar
  27. GOODMAN, Nelson & Catherine Z. ELGIN, Reconceptions in Philosophy and Other Arts and Sciences, Indianapolis, Hacket, 1988.Google Scholar
  28. GOLDSTEIN, Jeffrey, “Unbalancing Psychoanalytic Theory: Moving beyond the Equilibrium Model of Freud’s thought”, in: Robin ROBERTSON & Allan COMBS (eds.), Chaos Theory in Psychology and the Life Sciences, Mahwah (N.J.), Erlbaum, 1990.Google Scholar
  29. GROSS, Alan G., The Rhetoric of Science, Cambridge (Ma)-London, Harvard Univ. Press, 1990.Google Scholar
  30. GROTSTEIN, James S., “Nothingness, Meaninglessness, and Chaos in Psychoanalysis”, Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 26 (1990), pp. 274–279.Google Scholar
  31. HARRIES, Karsten, “The Many Uses of Metaphors”, Critical Inquiry, 5 (1978), pp. 167–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. HARRINGTON, Anne, “Metaphoric Connections: Holistic Science in the Shadow of the Third Reich”, Social Research, 62 (1995), pp. 357–385.Google Scholar
  33. HAYLES, N. Kathrine, Chaos Bound: Orderly Disorder in Contemporary Literature and Science, Ithaca-London, Cornell Univ. Press, 1991.Google Scholar
  34. HESSE, Mary, “The Explanatory Function of Metaphor”, in: Yehuda BAR-HILLEL (ed.), Logic, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science, Amsterdam, Elsevier, 1972, pp. 249–259.Google Scholar
  35. HESTER, Marcus B., The Meaning of Poetic Metaphor, The Hague, Mouton, 1967.Google Scholar
  36. HOBBES, Thomas, Leviathan (1651), Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1947.Google Scholar
  37. KANITSCHEIDER, Bernulf, “Philosophische Reflexionen über Chaos und Ordnung”, in: Heinz-Otto PEITGEN, Hartmut JüRGENS, Dietmar SAUPE (eds.), Bausteine der Ordnung, Stuttgart, Klett-Cotta, 1994.Google Scholar
  38. KAY, Lily A., “Who Wrote the Book of Life ? Information and Transformation of Molecular Biology, 1945–55”, Science in Context, 8 (1995), pp. 604–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. KITTAY, Eva Feder, Metaphor. Its Cognitive Force and Linguistic Structure, Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1987.Google Scholar
  40. KNEALE, Dennis, “Market Chaos: Scientists Seek Pattern in Stock Prices”, Wall Street Journal, Nov. 17, 1987, sect. 2Google Scholar
  41. KNORR-CETINA, Karin, “The Scientist as an Analogical Reasoner: A Critique of the Metaphor-Theory of Innovation”, Communication and Cognition, 13 (1980), pp. 183–208.Google Scholar
  42. LAKOFF, George, & Mark JOHNSON, “Conceptual Metaphor in Everyday Language”, The Journal of Philosophy, 77 (1980), pp. 453–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. LAKOFF, George, “Metaphor, Morality, and Politics, or, Why Conservatives Have Left Liberals in the Dust”, Social Research, 62 (1995), pp. 177–213.Google Scholar
  44. LOCKE, John, An Essay Concerning Human Understanding(1690), London, Basset.Google Scholar
  45. LORENZ, Edward, “Deterministic Nonperiod Flow”, Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 20 (1963), pp. 130–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. LUHMANN, Niklas, “Gesellschaftliche Struktur und Semantische Tradition”, in: Niklas LUHMANN, Gesellschaftsstruktur und Semantik. Studien zur Wissenssoziologie der modern Gesellschaft, Band 1, Frankfurt, Suhrkamp, 1980.Google Scholar
  47. MAASEN, Sabine, “Who is afraid of Metaphors ?”, in Sabine MAASEN, Everett MENDELSOHN, Peter WEINGART (eds.), Biology as Society, Society as Biology: Metaphors, Dordrecht-Boston-London, Kluwer, 1994, pp. 11–35.Google Scholar
  48. MAASEN, Sabine, & Peter WEINGART, “Metaphors — Messengers of Meaning. A Contribution to an Evolutionary Sociology of Science”, Science Communication, 17 (1995), pp. 9–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. MAC CORMAC, Earl. R., A Cognitive Theory of Metaphor, Cambridge, (Mas)-London, M.I.T. Press, 1985.Google Scholar
  50. MANDELBROT, Benoit (1977), The Fractal Geometry of Nature, San Francisco, Freeman, 1977.Google Scholar
  51. MAXWELL, J.C., Matter and Motion, New York, Macmillan, 1877.Google Scholar
  52. MIROWSKI, Philip, “From Mandelbrot to Chaos in Economic Theory”, Southern Economic Journal, 57 (1990), pp. 289–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. PEAT, David F., “The Geometrization of Thought”, in: Robin ROBERTSON & Allan COMBS (eds.), Chaos Theory in Psychology and the Life Sciences, Mahwah (N.J.), Erlbaum, 1995, pp. 359 – 372.Google Scholar
  54. POINCARé, H., Les Méthodes nouvelles de la mécanique céleste, Paris, Gauthiers-Villars, 1892. English translation: Springfield, Federal Clearinghouse, 1967.Google Scholar
  55. RADMAN, Zdravko, Metaphors: Figures of the Mind, Dordrecht-Boston-London, Kluwer, 1997.Google Scholar
  56. RICHARDS, Ivor Armstrong, The Philosophy of Rhetoric, New York, Oxford Univ. Press, 1936.Google Scholar
  57. RICOEUR, Paul, “The Metaphorical Process as Cognition, Imagination, and Feeling”, Critical Inquiry, 5 (1978), pp. 143–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. ROBERTSON, Robin, “Chaos Theory and the Relationship between Psychology and the Sciences”, in: Robin ROBERTSON & Allan COMBS (eds.), Chaos Theory in Psychology and the Life Sciences, Mahwah (N.J.), Erlbaum, 1995, pp. 3 – 16.Google Scholar
  59. ROBERTSON, Robin, & Allan COMBS, Chaos Theory in Psychology and the Life Sciences, Mahwah (N.J.), Erlbaum, 1995.Google Scholar
  60. RORTY, Richard, Contingency, Irony and Solidarity, Cambridge, Cambridge Univ. Press, 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. ROSSER, J.B., Jr., “Chaos Theory and New Keynsean Economics”, Manchester School of Economic and Social Studies, 58 (1991), pp. 256–291.Google Scholar
  62. SABELLI, Hector et al., “Psychocardiological Portraits: A Clinical Application of Process Theory”, in: Frederick David ABRAHAM &, Albert R. GILGEN (eds.), Chaos Theory in Psychology, Westport, Greenwood Press, 1995, pp. 107–126.Google Scholar
  63. SAFAN-GERARD, Desy, “Chaos and Control in the Creative Process”, Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, 13 (1990), pp. 129–138.Google Scholar
  64. SCHEFFLER, I., “The Myths of Metaphor”, Communication and Cognition, 19(1986), pp. 389–394.Google Scholar
  65. STEPAN, Nancy Leys, “Race and Gender: The Role of Analogy in Science”, Critiques & Contentions, 11(1986), pp. 261–277.Google Scholar
  66. STEVENSON, Howard, & Susan HARMELING, “Entrepeneurial Management’s Need for a More ‘Chaotic’ Theory”, Journal of Business Venturing, 1990, pp. 1–14.Google Scholar
  67. TURBAYNE, Colin Murray, The Myth of Metaphor, New Haven-London, Yale Univ. Press, 1962.Google Scholar
  68. VAN BRAKEL, J. & J.P.M. GEURTS, “Pragmatic Identity of Meaning and Metaphor”, International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 2 (1988), 2, 205 – 226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. VAN BRESIEN, Fred, “Metaphors in Scientific Language”, Communication & Cognition, 22 (1989), pp. 5 – 22.Google Scholar
  70. VAN NOPPEN, Jean-Pierre, et al., Metaphor. Bibliography of Post 1970 Publications, Amsterdam-Philadelphia, John Benjamins, 1985.Google Scholar
  71. VAN NOPPEN, Jean-Pierre, & Edith HOLST, Metaphor II. A Classified Bibliography of Publications, 1985–1990, Amsterdam, Philadelphia, John Benjamins, 1990.Google Scholar
  72. WHITE, Roger M., The Structure of Metaphor. The Way the Language of Metaphor Works, Cambridge (Ma), Blackwell, 1996.Google Scholar
  73. WOLF, G. (1991), “Gestalten von Komplexität durch Netzwerk-Management”, in K.W. KRATNY & F. WALLNER (eds.), Grundprinzipien der Selbstorganisation, Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1991, pp. 103–126.Google Scholar
  74. YORKE, James, LI, T.-Y. (1975), “Period Three Implies Chaos”, American Mathematical Monthly, 82 (1975), pp. 985–992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sabine Maasen
    • 1
  1. 1.Max-Planck-Institut für psychologische ForschungMünchenGermany

Personalised recommendations