Skip to main content

The Origin of Scientific Realism: Boltzmann, Planck, Einstein

  • Chapter
The Reality of the Unobservable

Part of the book series: Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science ((BSPS,volume 215))

Abstract

Scientific realism today is an issue much debated by philosophers of science.2 However, to the best of my knowledge it was invented by physicists, and this is a fact that seems to have fallen into oblivion. Moreover, scientific realism emerged in a period where there was a general turn in the attitude of the physicists in matters of the philosophical foundations of their science. In obvious connection with the establishment of theoretical physics as a new discipline at the end of the 19th century, we see the new theoretical physicists becoming engaged in a lively debate on various philosophical questions concerning physics. And not only did this happen but it was also immediately noticed — from without and within. In the years before the First World War the theologian Adolf v. Harnack is said to have said on occasion: “People complain that our generation has no philosophers. Quite unjustly: it is merely that today’s philosophers sit in another department, their names are Planck and Einstein.”3 And as early as 1901 Wilhelm Ostwald in his lectures on natural philosophy testified to the change: ‘The mental operations by which scientific work is organized... are not essentially different from those that are investigated in philosophy. The awareness of this situation was indeed obscured for some time during the second half of the 19th century; but in our days it has awakened to a most vivid efficacy, and everywhere the spirits are aroused in the scientists’ camp to make their contribution to the whole of philosophical knowledge.”4

A French version of Scheibe’s talk at the 1995 Parma Conference has been already published in Les savants et Vépistémologie, M. Panza and J.C. Pont eds., Editions Albert Blanchard, Paris 1995. The French Publisher and the Editors are hereby gratefully acknowledged for the permission of including this paper in its English version in the present Collection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • F. Adler, “Die Einheit des physikalischen Weltbildes”, Naturwissenschaftl. Wochenschrift, Neue Folge VIII, 1909, pp. 817–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Bavink, “Bedeutung des Konvergenzprinzips für die Erkenntnistheorie der Naturwissenschaften”, Zeitschr. f. philos. Forschg., 2, 1947, pp. 111–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • J.T. Blackmore, “Boltzmann’s Concessions to Mach’s Philosophy of Science’, in Ludwig Boltzmann, Gesamtausgabe, vol. 8, Ed. by R.U. Sexl, Vieweg, Braunschweig, 1982, pp. 155–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Blanshard, The Nature of Thought, 2 vols., London, 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Bois-Reymond, Über die Grenzen des Naturerkennens, Veit, Leipzig, 1872,11 1916.

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Boltzmann, Populäre Schriften, J.A. Barth, Leipzig, 1905, quoted edition by E.Broda, Vieweg, Braunschweig 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Boltzmann, Vorlesungen Über Gastheorie, J.A. Barth, Leipzig, 1896, quoted after, Ludwig Boltzmann, Gesamtausgabe, vol. 1, Ed. by R.U. Sexl, Vieweg, Braunschweig, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Boltzmann, Theoretical Physics and Philosophical Problems — Selected Writings, Ed. by B. McGuinness, Reidel, Dordrecht, 1974.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • L. Boltzmann, Prinzipien der Naturfilosophie, Ed. by J.M. Fasol-Boltzmann, Springer, Berlin, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • St.G. Brush, Ludwig Boltzmann and the Foundations of Natural Sciences, in Boltzmann 1990, pp. 43–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Einstein, “Eisbachs Buch: Kant und Einstein”, Deutsche Literaturztg. 45, 1924, 1685–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Einstein, “Über den gegenwärtigen Stand der Feldtheorie”, Festschrift für A. Stodola, Zürich, 1929, pp. 126–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Einstein, Mein Weltbild, Querido, Amsterdam, 1934, quoted after Ullstein Sachbuch, Frankfurt, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Einstein, “Autobiographical Notes and Remarks to the Essays Appearing in this Collective Volume”, in Schilpp 1949, pp. 1–95 and pp. 663–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Einstein, “Autobiographisches und Bemerkungen zu den in diesem Bande vereinigten Arbeiten”, in Schilpp 1951, pp. 1–35 and pp. 493–511.

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Einstein, “On the Generalized Theory of Gravitation”, Sci. Amer. 182, April 1950, pp. 13–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A. Einstein, Ideas and Opinions, Crown Publ., New York, 1954.

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Einstein, “Einleitende Bemerkungen über Grundbegriffe”, in Louis de Broglie und die Physiker, ed. by A. George. Ciaassen, Hamburg, 1955, pp. 13–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Einstein, Aus meinen späten Jahren, DVA, Stuttgart, 1979,3, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Y. Elkana, “Boltzmann’s Scientific Research Programme and its Alternatives”, in Some Aspects of the Interaction between Science and Philosophy, Ed. by Y. Elkana, Humanities Press, Atlantic Highlands, 1971, pp. 243–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • J.L. Heilbron, “The Dilemmas of an Upright Man”, Max Planck as Spokesman for German Science, Univ. of California Press, Berkeley, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • J.L. Heilbron, Max Planck. Ein Leben fir die Wissenschaft, 1858–1947, Hirzel, Stuttgart, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • H.v. Helmholtz, “Über das Verhältnis der Naturwissenschaften zur Gesamtheit der Wissenschaft”, Akad. Festrede (Heidelberg, 1862), in H.v.Helmholtz Vorträge und Reden, Vieweg, Braunschweig 51903, vol.1, pp. 159–85.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • H. v. Helmholtz, Die Tatsachen der Wahrnehmung, Hirschwald, Berlin, 1879, quoted Edition: Wiss. Buchgesellsch., Darmstadt 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Holton, “Mach, Einstein, and the Search for Reality”, Daedalus 97, 1968, pp. 636–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Holton, “Thematische Analyse der Wissenschaft”, Die Physik Einsteins und seiner Zeit, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • St. Jaki, The Relevance of Physics, Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Jost, “Boltzmann und Planck. Die Krise des Atomismus um die Jahrhundertwende und ihre Überwindung durch Einstein”, in Einstein-Symposion Berlin (ed. by H. Nelkowski et al), Springer, Berlin, 1979, pp. 128–45.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ch. Jungnickel, and R.McCormmach, Intellectual Mastery of Nature. Theoretical Physics from Ohm to Einstein, 2 vols., Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Kirchhoff, Vorlesungen über mathematische Physik, vol.1 Mechanik, Teubner, Leipzig, 1876.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Leplin, Scientific Realism, University of California Press, Berkeley, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Mach, Die Geschichte und die Wurzel des Satzes von der Erhaltung der Arbeit, Calve, Prag, 1872, quoted Ed.: Bonset, Amsterdam, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Mach, Die Prinzipien der Wärmelehre, J.A.Barth, Leipzig, 1896, quoted Ed.: 21900.

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Mach, “Die Leitgedanken meiner naturwissenschaftlichen Erkenntnislehre und ihre Aufnahme durch die Zeitgenossen”, Phys. Zeitschr. XI (1910), pp. 599–606.

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Mach, Die Mechanik in ihrer Entwicklung, Brockhaus, Leipzig, 1883, quoted ed.: 71912.

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Mach, Die Analyse der Empfindungen und das Verhältnis des Physischen zum Psychischen, Fischer, Jena, 71911, quoted Ed.: Wiss. Buchgesellsch., Darmstadt, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • G.E. Moore, Proof of an External World, Proc. Brit. Acad. 1939, pp. 273–300, quoted after: Philosophical Papers, Allen & Unwin, London, 1959, pp. 127–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Müller, “Naturwissenschaft und reale Außenwelt”, Die Naturwissenschaften 28, 1940, pp. 705–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • W. Ostwald, “Die Überwindung des wissenschaftlichen Materialismus”, Verhandig, Gesellsch. Deutscher Naturforscher u. Ärzte 67, 1895, Erster Teil pp. 155–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • W. Ostwald, Vorlesungen über Naturphilosophie, Veit, Leipzig, 1902.

    Google Scholar 

  • K. Pearson, The Grammar of Science, Scott, London, 1892, reprint Thoemmes, Bristol, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Planck, Acht Vorlesungen über Theoretische Physik, Hirzel, Leipzig, 1910.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Planck, “Zur Mach’schen Theorie der physikalischen Erkenntnis”, Phys. Zeitschr. XI, 1910, 1186–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Planck, “Naturwissenschaft und reale Außenwelt”, Die Naturwissenschaften28, 1940, pp. 778–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. Planck, Vorträge und Erinnerungen 5, Stuttgart, 1949.

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Putnam, “What is Realism?”, in Leplin, 1984. pp. 140–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Scheibe, “The Physicists’ Conception of Progress”, Stud. Hist. Phil. Sci. 19, 1988, pp. 141–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • E. Scheibe, “Albert Einstein: Theorie, Erfahrung, Wirklichkeit”, Heidelberger JahrbücherXXXVI, 1992, pp. 121–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • P.A. Schilpp, Albert Einstein. Philosopher-Scientist, Library of Living Philosophers, Evanston, Ill., 1949.

    Google Scholar 

  • P.A. Schilpp, Albert Einstein als Philosoph und Naturforscher, Kohlhammer, Stuttgart, 1951.

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Seelig, Albert Einstein und die Schweiz, Zürich, 1952.

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Sommerfeld, “To Albert Einstein’s Seventieth Birthday”, in Schilpp 1949, pp. 97–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Sommerfeld, “Albert Einstein”, in Schilpp 1951. pp. 37–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Sommerfeld, “Einige grundsätzliche Bemerkungen zur Wellenmechanik”, Phys. Zeitsc.hr.XXX, 1929, pp. 866–71, quoted from Sommerfeld 1968, 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Sommerfeld, “Wege zur physikalischen Erkenntnis”, Scientia, April 1936, pp. 181–7, quoted from Sommerfeld 1968, 609–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Sommerfeld, “Philosophie und Physik seit 1900”, Naturwiss, Rundschau I, 1948, pp. 97–100, quoted from Sommerfeld, 1968, 640–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Sommerfeld, Gesammelte Schriften, Vieweg, Braunschweig, 1968, vol. IV.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Thiele, “Ein zeitgenössisches Urteil über die Kontroverse zwischen Max Planck und Ernst Mach”, Centaurus 13, 1968, pp. 85–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O. Wiener, “Die Erweiterung unserer Sinne”, Deutsche Revue über das gesamte nationale Leben der Gegenwart, 25. Jahrg, 1900, vol. 4, pp. 25–41.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Scheibe, E. (2000). The Origin of Scientific Realism: Boltzmann, Planck, Einstein. In: Agazzi, E., Pauri, M. (eds) The Reality of the Unobservable. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 215. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9391-5_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9391-5_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5458-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-9391-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics