Abstract
Scientific realism today is an issue much debated by philosophers of science.2 However, to the best of my knowledge it was invented by physicists, and this is a fact that seems to have fallen into oblivion. Moreover, scientific realism emerged in a period where there was a general turn in the attitude of the physicists in matters of the philosophical foundations of their science. In obvious connection with the establishment of theoretical physics as a new discipline at the end of the 19th century, we see the new theoretical physicists becoming engaged in a lively debate on various philosophical questions concerning physics. And not only did this happen but it was also immediately noticed — from without and within. In the years before the First World War the theologian Adolf v. Harnack is said to have said on occasion: “People complain that our generation has no philosophers. Quite unjustly: it is merely that today’s philosophers sit in another department, their names are Planck and Einstein.”3 And as early as 1901 Wilhelm Ostwald in his lectures on natural philosophy testified to the change: ‘The mental operations by which scientific work is organized... are not essentially different from those that are investigated in philosophy. The awareness of this situation was indeed obscured for some time during the second half of the 19th century; but in our days it has awakened to a most vivid efficacy, and everywhere the spirits are aroused in the scientists’ camp to make their contribution to the whole of philosophical knowledge.”4
A French version of Scheibe’s talk at the 1995 Parma Conference has been already published in Les savants et Vépistémologie, M. Panza and J.C. Pont eds., Editions Albert Blanchard, Paris 1995. The French Publisher and the Editors are hereby gratefully acknowledged for the permission of including this paper in its English version in the present Collection.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
F. Adler, “Die Einheit des physikalischen Weltbildes”, Naturwissenschaftl. Wochenschrift, Neue Folge VIII, 1909, pp. 817–22.
B. Bavink, “Bedeutung des Konvergenzprinzips für die Erkenntnistheorie der Naturwissenschaften”, Zeitschr. f. philos. Forschg., 2, 1947, pp. 111–30.
J.T. Blackmore, “Boltzmann’s Concessions to Mach’s Philosophy of Science’, in Ludwig Boltzmann, Gesamtausgabe, vol. 8, Ed. by R.U. Sexl, Vieweg, Braunschweig, 1982, pp. 155–90.
B. Blanshard, The Nature of Thought, 2 vols., London, 1939.
E. Bois-Reymond, Über die Grenzen des Naturerkennens, Veit, Leipzig, 1872,11 1916.
L. Boltzmann, Populäre Schriften, J.A. Barth, Leipzig, 1905, quoted edition by E.Broda, Vieweg, Braunschweig 1979.
L. Boltzmann, Vorlesungen Über Gastheorie, J.A. Barth, Leipzig, 1896, quoted after, Ludwig Boltzmann, Gesamtausgabe, vol. 1, Ed. by R.U. Sexl, Vieweg, Braunschweig, 1981.
L. Boltzmann, Theoretical Physics and Philosophical Problems — Selected Writings, Ed. by B. McGuinness, Reidel, Dordrecht, 1974.
L. Boltzmann, Prinzipien der Naturfilosophie, Ed. by J.M. Fasol-Boltzmann, Springer, Berlin, 1990.
St.G. Brush, Ludwig Boltzmann and the Foundations of Natural Sciences, in Boltzmann 1990, pp. 43–61.
A. Einstein, “Eisbachs Buch: Kant und Einstein”, Deutsche Literaturztg. 45, 1924, 1685–94.
A. Einstein, “Über den gegenwärtigen Stand der Feldtheorie”, Festschrift für A. Stodola, Zürich, 1929, pp. 126–32.
A. Einstein, Mein Weltbild, Querido, Amsterdam, 1934, quoted after Ullstein Sachbuch, Frankfurt, 1989).
A. Einstein, “Autobiographical Notes and Remarks to the Essays Appearing in this Collective Volume”, in Schilpp 1949, pp. 1–95 and pp. 663–88.
A. Einstein, “Autobiographisches und Bemerkungen zu den in diesem Bande vereinigten Arbeiten”, in Schilpp 1951, pp. 1–35 and pp. 493–511.
A. Einstein, “On the Generalized Theory of Gravitation”, Sci. Amer. 182, April 1950, pp. 13–7.
A. Einstein, Ideas and Opinions, Crown Publ., New York, 1954.
A. Einstein, “Einleitende Bemerkungen über Grundbegriffe”, in Louis de Broglie und die Physiker, ed. by A. George. Ciaassen, Hamburg, 1955, pp. 13–7.
A. Einstein, Aus meinen späten Jahren, DVA, Stuttgart, 1979,3, 1984.
Y. Elkana, “Boltzmann’s Scientific Research Programme and its Alternatives”, in Some Aspects of the Interaction between Science and Philosophy, Ed. by Y. Elkana, Humanities Press, Atlantic Highlands, 1971, pp. 243–79.
J.L. Heilbron, “The Dilemmas of an Upright Man”, Max Planck as Spokesman for German Science, Univ. of California Press, Berkeley, 1986.
J.L. Heilbron, Max Planck. Ein Leben fir die Wissenschaft, 1858–1947, Hirzel, Stuttgart, 1988.
H.v. Helmholtz, “Über das Verhältnis der Naturwissenschaften zur Gesamtheit der Wissenschaft”, Akad. Festrede (Heidelberg, 1862), in H.v.Helmholtz Vorträge und Reden, Vieweg, Braunschweig 51903, vol.1, pp. 159–85.
H. v. Helmholtz, Die Tatsachen der Wahrnehmung, Hirschwald, Berlin, 1879, quoted Edition: Wiss. Buchgesellsch., Darmstadt 1959.
G. Holton, “Mach, Einstein, and the Search for Reality”, Daedalus 97, 1968, pp. 636–73.
G. Holton, “Thematische Analyse der Wissenschaft”, Die Physik Einsteins und seiner Zeit, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt, 1981.
St. Jaki, The Relevance of Physics, Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1966.
R. Jost, “Boltzmann und Planck. Die Krise des Atomismus um die Jahrhundertwende und ihre Überwindung durch Einstein”, in Einstein-Symposion Berlin (ed. by H. Nelkowski et al), Springer, Berlin, 1979, pp. 128–45.
Ch. Jungnickel, and R.McCormmach, Intellectual Mastery of Nature. Theoretical Physics from Ohm to Einstein, 2 vols., Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1986.
G. Kirchhoff, Vorlesungen über mathematische Physik, vol.1 Mechanik, Teubner, Leipzig, 1876.
J. Leplin, Scientific Realism, University of California Press, Berkeley, 1984.
E. Mach, Die Geschichte und die Wurzel des Satzes von der Erhaltung der Arbeit, Calve, Prag, 1872, quoted Ed.: Bonset, Amsterdam, 1969.
E. Mach, Die Prinzipien der Wärmelehre, J.A.Barth, Leipzig, 1896, quoted Ed.: 21900.
E. Mach, “Die Leitgedanken meiner naturwissenschaftlichen Erkenntnislehre und ihre Aufnahme durch die Zeitgenossen”, Phys. Zeitschr. XI (1910), pp. 599–606.
E. Mach, Die Mechanik in ihrer Entwicklung, Brockhaus, Leipzig, 1883, quoted ed.: 71912.
E. Mach, Die Analyse der Empfindungen und das Verhältnis des Physischen zum Psychischen, Fischer, Jena, 71911, quoted Ed.: Wiss. Buchgesellsch., Darmstadt, 1991.
G.E. Moore, Proof of an External World, Proc. Brit. Acad. 1939, pp. 273–300, quoted after: Philosophical Papers, Allen & Unwin, London, 1959, pp. 127–150.
A. Müller, “Naturwissenschaft und reale Außenwelt”, Die Naturwissenschaften 28, 1940, pp. 705–9.
W. Ostwald, “Die Überwindung des wissenschaftlichen Materialismus”, Verhandig, Gesellsch. Deutscher Naturforscher u. Ärzte 67, 1895, Erster Teil pp. 155–68.
W. Ostwald, Vorlesungen über Naturphilosophie, Veit, Leipzig, 1902.
K. Pearson, The Grammar of Science, Scott, London, 1892, reprint Thoemmes, Bristol, 1991.
M. Planck, Acht Vorlesungen über Theoretische Physik, Hirzel, Leipzig, 1910.
M. Planck, “Zur Mach’schen Theorie der physikalischen Erkenntnis”, Phys. Zeitschr. XI, 1910, 1186–90.
M. Planck, “Naturwissenschaft und reale Außenwelt”, Die Naturwissenschaften28, 1940, pp. 778–9.
M. Planck, Vorträge und Erinnerungen 5, Stuttgart, 1949.
H. Putnam, “What is Realism?”, in Leplin, 1984. pp. 140–53.
E. Scheibe, “The Physicists’ Conception of Progress”, Stud. Hist. Phil. Sci. 19, 1988, pp. 141–59.
E. Scheibe, “Albert Einstein: Theorie, Erfahrung, Wirklichkeit”, Heidelberger JahrbücherXXXVI, 1992, pp. 121–38.
P.A. Schilpp, Albert Einstein. Philosopher-Scientist, Library of Living Philosophers, Evanston, Ill., 1949.
P.A. Schilpp, Albert Einstein als Philosoph und Naturforscher, Kohlhammer, Stuttgart, 1951.
C. Seelig, Albert Einstein und die Schweiz, Zürich, 1952.
A. Sommerfeld, “To Albert Einstein’s Seventieth Birthday”, in Schilpp 1949, pp. 97–106.
A. Sommerfeld, “Albert Einstein”, in Schilpp 1951. pp. 37–42.
A. Sommerfeld, “Einige grundsätzliche Bemerkungen zur Wellenmechanik”, Phys. Zeitsc.hr.XXX, 1929, pp. 866–71, quoted from Sommerfeld 1968, 1–6.
A. Sommerfeld, “Wege zur physikalischen Erkenntnis”, Scientia, April 1936, pp. 181–7, quoted from Sommerfeld 1968, 609–15.
A. Sommerfeld, “Philosophie und Physik seit 1900”, Naturwiss, Rundschau I, 1948, pp. 97–100, quoted from Sommerfeld, 1968, 640–3.
A. Sommerfeld, Gesammelte Schriften, Vieweg, Braunschweig, 1968, vol. IV.
J. Thiele, “Ein zeitgenössisches Urteil über die Kontroverse zwischen Max Planck und Ernst Mach”, Centaurus 13, 1968, pp. 85–90.
O. Wiener, “Die Erweiterung unserer Sinne”, Deutsche Revue über das gesamte nationale Leben der Gegenwart, 25. Jahrg, 1900, vol. 4, pp. 25–41.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Scheibe, E. (2000). The Origin of Scientific Realism: Boltzmann, Planck, Einstein. In: Agazzi, E., Pauri, M. (eds) The Reality of the Unobservable. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 215. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9391-5_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9391-5_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5458-6
Online ISBN: 978-94-015-9391-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive