Skip to main content

Comparative Embryological Studies (1881–1885)

  • Chapter
  • 109 Accesses

Part of the book series: Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science ((BSPS,volume 212))

Abstract

The Geryonidae seem to be particularly useful in considering the formation of endoderm in the Metazoa; the fairly large size of their embryonic cells facilitates such a study. I studied the embryonic devlopment of Carmarina hastata as early as 1870, and found that “the blastoderm divides into two layers, with a transparent gelatinous mass between them.” [1] A year later, Folle [2] studied the development of Gyryonia (Carmarina) fungiformis and observed the same division of the blastula into two embryonic layers. Our data, however, was disputed by Kovalevsky in 1873, [3] who considered that the blastodem in Carmarina hastata becomes invaginated; this invagination, according to him, subsequently leads to the formation of endoderm. Kovalevsky observed the same division of blastoderm cells but interpreted it differently from Folle and myself. The following quotation is from Kovalevsky’s Russian text:

Cell division is very rapid and results in the forrmation of a one-layered blastoderm consisting of fairly elongated cylindrical, or more correctly truncated-pyramidal, cells surrounding a small cleavage cavity.2 The nuclei are located at the outer ends of the cells, while the inner parts are filled with transparent gelatinous matter. The separation of the outer and inner parts is soon observed; the former is transformed into surface epithelium, while the inner parts fuse with each other to form an almost completely homogeneous, gelatinous mass, which fills up the cleavage cavity to form a gelatinous mass in the young larva; a small invagination in the surface cells at one end of the embryo becomes the larval stomach; the ventral side of the outer layer, close to the mouth, thickens, and small rudiments of nodulose tentacles develop, and the formation of the umbrellar cavity begins.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Metchnikoff, E.I. Issledovaniya o razvitii meduz i sifonofor. Sobraniye sochinenij, Moscow: Izd-vo Academii Nauk SSSR, vol. II, 1946, str. 424–471.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Jenaische Zeitschr., Bd. VII, 1873, S. 471.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Nabludeniya nad razvitiem kishechnopolostnyh. Izvestiya O-va lubitelej estestvoznaniya, antropo logii i etnografii, t. X, v. 2, M., 1874, str. 10.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Studien zur Gaestraea Theorie, 1877, S. 267. Note.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Embrional’noye razvitiye i pochkovaniye Pedicelina echinata, Zeitschr. f wiss. Zool.,Bd. XXX, S. 525.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Die Coelomtheorie, Jenaische Zeischr.,Bd. XV, H. 1, S. 124.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Issledovaniya o razvitii meduz i sifonofor.(vol. 2 of Russian edition, pp. 424–471)

    Google Scholar 

  8. These drawings are utterly similar to drawings in the Strassburger’s book, Zellbildung und Zelltheilung, 3rd ed., Jena, 1880, Fig. II, Dr. 38–53.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Zeitschr. f wiss. Zool., Bd. XX XII, 1879.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Thus, I consider stages in Dr. 34 and 35 (Fig. XIX) to be too different to compare to each other; it is quite doubtful also that the two-layered endoderma becomes a one-layered one.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Handb. d. vergl. Embryol.,Bd. I, Jena, 1880, S. 148, Note.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Loc. cit., p. 338.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Das System der Medusen (first part of the first chapter), Jena, 1879, S. 348. He mentions here a swiming-at-large gaestrula in Craspedota (p. 7, 119); since its existence is not proved by any data I will not consider it.

    Google Scholar 

  14. proishozhdenii kunin, pochkuyuscihsya v zheludke gerionid. Izvestiya Ob-va lubiteley estestvoznaniya, antropologii i etnografii, V. XXIV, M., 1876, str. 7.

    Google Scholar 

  15. My observations of Cunina rhododactyla do nor confirm Haeckel’s assumption that there is a genetic link between Carmarina and Cunina, as well as that formation of buds on Carmarina’s tongue is due to sexless reproduction occured on the aboral surface of “maternal” bud. (This research is published in Vol. 2 of the Russian edition, pp. 424–471)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Metchnikoff refers here to his Spongiological Studies published in Vol. II of the Russian edition, pp. 61–88.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Handb. d. vergl. Embryol.,Bd. I, S.172.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Annales des sciences naturelles,3 Serie, t. VII, tabl. V, fig. 13–15, p.91.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Beitrag zur Entwicklungsgeschichte der Seeigellarven,Heidelberg, 1849, S. 18.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Beobachtungen uber Anatomie u. Entwickl. einiger wirbellosen Seethiere,1851, S. 81,89.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Archiv f Anatomie u. Physiol.,1851, Taf. XIV, Fig. 2,3, S. 347.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Archiv j. Anatomie u. Physiol.,1855, Taf. XX, Fig. 1–5, S. 493.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, v. XI, 1853, p. 122.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Entwicklungsgeschichte der einfachen Asciden, Mem. de l’Acad. de S.-Petersb., t. X, N 15, 1866, P. 5

    Google Scholar 

  25. Entwicklungsgeschichte der eingachen Asciden, Mem. de l’Acad. de S.-Petersb., t.XI, N14, 1867, P. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Anatomiya i istiriya razvitiya Phoronis. Zapiski Peterburgskoj Akademii nauk. Prilozheniye N 1, 1867, p. 24.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Beitrage zur Entwicklungsgeschichte der Holothuries, Mem. de l’Acad. de Sci de S.-Petersburg,Bd. XI, N 6, 1867, p. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Embryologische Studien an Wurmern und Arthropoden, Mem. de l’Acad. de Sci. de S.-Petersbur,t. P g XVI, NI2, 1871, p. 28.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Goettinger Nachrichten,N 7, 1868, p. 155.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Izvestiya Obschestva lubitelej estestviznaniya, antropologii i etnografii,M., 1873.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Biologische Studien. II Studien zur Castraeatheorie, Jena, 1877.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Handb. d. vergl. Embryol. Deutsch. von Vetter,Bd. II, 1881, S. 306.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Entwicklungsgeschichte Beitrage,Zeitschr. f. wiss. Zool., Bd. XXIX, 1877, S.231.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Beitrage zur Entwicklungsgeschichte u. Morphologie der Anneliden, Sitzungsber d.k. Akad. d. Wissenschf., Bd. LXXIV, 1877, S. 446.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Ueber Entwicklungsgeschichte von Teredo, Arbeiten aus dem Zool. Institut in Wien, Bd. III, 1880, S. 26.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Embryonalentwicklung u. Knospung der Oedicelina echinata, Zeitschr. f wiss. Zool., Bd. XXIX, 1877, S. 526.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Studien uber Entwinclunggeschichte der Anneliden, Arbeiten des. Zool. Institut in Wien,Bd. I, H.3, 1878, S. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Studien uber Entwicklung des Ampioxus, Arbeiten des Zool. Institut in Wien, Bd. IV, 1881, S. 28.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Ueber die Entwicklung der Tellerschecke, Morphol., Jahrb., Bd. V, 1879.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Die Coelomtheorie, Janaische Zeitschr., Bd. XV, 1881, S. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Keimblatter u. Organanlage der Echiniden, Zeitschr. f wiss. Zool., Bd. XXXIII, 1879, S. 39.

    Google Scholar 

  42. See: Zool. Anzeiger, 1881, N 78, S. 141.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Die Coelomtheorie, Jenaische Zeitschr., Bd. XIV, 1881, S. 120.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Ibid., S.2.

    Google Scholar 

  45. See: Metchnikoff, E.I. Spongiologicheskiye issledovaniya. Sobraniye sochinenij, Moscow, 1946, vol. III, pp. 61, 88.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Die Coelomtheorie,S.78.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Handb. d. verge Embryol.,Bd. II, S. 322.

    Google Scholar 

  48. This drawing, as all the others, is sketched with a help of prisma; my major concern here, as everywhere else in drawing, is to depict contours in a most complete and accurate manner.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Beitrage zur Entwicklungsgeschichte u. Morphologie d. Anneliden,Weiner Sitzungsber., 1877, S. 448.

    Google Scholar 

  50. On embryology of Polygordius flavocapitatus see Repiahov’s note in Zool. Anzeiger,1881, N 94, S. 518. A conclusion that this annelid does not undergo any metamorphosis and that from a stage of worm it transforms directly into a stage of gastraea is based on misunderstanding.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Note sur l’embryologie de la Salmacina Dysteri. Comptes rendus de l’Acad. des sciences. 17 janvier 1875, p. 2669.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Ibid.,p. 518.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Anhandl. zur Entw. der Thieren,H. 1, Leipzig, 1882, S. 86.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Compare my studies on development of Echinodermata and Nemertea. Mem. de l’Acad. des sciences de S. Petersb., t. XIV, N 8, p. 49. A described there nemertin — Lineus Caoteus — is a species frequently encountered near Messina).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Studien zur Entwincklungsgeschichte d. Anneliden,S. 104.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Handb. d. vergl. Embryol.,Bd. II, S. 334.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Ibid.,S. 343.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Archiv f microse,Bd. VII, 1871, S. 101.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Gastraeatheorie,S. 20, 154.

    Google Scholar 

  60. I intentionally ignore here mollusks, contradictory studies of which by Ray Lankester and Bütschli point to analysis of evolution of Paludina.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Since I hope to publish data on creation of endoderma in intestinal-cavitals later, let me refer to the Russian-language work by Kovalevsky (1873) where he compares process of migration in Obelia (Eucope polystyla) to invagination in Acalefa, Actinia,and Cerranthus.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Handb. d. vergleichenden Embryol.,Bd. II S. 304.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Nabludeniya nad razvitiem brachiopod, Izvestiya Obscestva lubitelej estestvoznaniya, antropologii i etnografii, 1874, str. 14,15.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Anatomie et developpement des Ophiures,1881, p. 72. If I reject delamination in Ophiotrix,then I should definitely agree with Apostolodes, who claims, contrary to my previous data, that embryo of Amphiura squammata has, together with anal hole, a rear intestine. I saw these formations after resuming my studies.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Pro-hydra, discovered by Greev, was ignored by many authors. The same species was found last year by Reingard near Odessa, and was observed by me, though exceptionally rare.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Notes on Embryology and Classification, Quart. Journ. of Micr. Sc.,1877, p. 410.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Metagenesis and Hypogenesis von Aurelia aurita,Jena, 1881, S. 12.

    Google Scholar 

  68. I would like to mention here that, according to my studies, position of blastopore in this animal coincides with its future mouth.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Die Entwicklung der Keimblatter,Festschrift, Leipzig, 1882, S. 38.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Unters. uber Orthonectiden, Zeitschrift. f wiss. Zool., Bd. XXXY, 1881, S. 300.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Recherches sur l’embryologie des Bryozoires,Lille, 187, tabl. III, p. 61.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Die Ctenophoren des Golfes von Neapel,Leipzig, 1880, S. 106.

    Google Scholar 

  73. On the development of ctenophores evolution see, “Nabludeniya nad pazvitiem kishechnopolostnyh”, Izvestiya Obschestva lubitelej estestvoznaniya, antropologii i etnografii. M., 1873.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Mem. Acad. Sciences de St-Petersburg,t. X, N 4, 1866.

    Google Scholar 

  75. Nabludenuya nad razvitiem kishechnopolostnyh,str. 36.

    Google Scholar 

  76. Ibid.,str. 115.

    Google Scholar 

  77. Ibid.,str. 197.

    Google Scholar 

  78. Ueber den Bau der Ctenophoren. Jenaische Zeitschr.,Bd. XIV, 180, S. 330.

    Google Scholar 

  79. Die Coelomtheorie, Janaische Zeitschr.,Bd. XV, 181, S. 121.

    Google Scholar 

  80. Ibid.,S. 122.

    Google Scholar 

  81. Ueber die pathologische Bedeutung der intracellulaeren Verdauung, Fortschritte der Medizin, 1884, 17, S. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  82. Leçons sur l’histologie du systeme nerveux, 1,178.

    Google Scholar 

  83. Ueber eine Brachiolaria des Kieler Hafens, Arch. f Naturgesch.,163, S. 242.

    Google Scholar 

  84. Vertl. Entwicklungsgesch. d. Comatula medii, Arch. f mikrosc. Anatomie, 1876, XII, S. 587.

    Google Scholar 

  85. Issledovaniya razvitiya iglokoszih i nemertin.

    Google Scholar 

  86. Zur Entw. der Holothurien, Zeitschr. f wiss. Zool., Bd. XXVII, 1876, S. 160.

    Google Scholar 

  87. Stidiem ueber Entw. der Anneliden, Arbeiten aus dem zool. Inst.,Wien, 1, 1878, S. 95, 98.

    Google Scholar 

  88. Keimblaetter u. Organanlage d. Echiniden, Zeitschr. f wiss. Zool., Bd. XXXIII, 1879, S. 45.

    Google Scholar 

  89. Ueber Entwicklungsgesch. v. Teredo, Arb. aus. d. zool. Inst., Wien III, 1880, S. 30.

    Google Scholar 

  90. Comparative Embryological Studies, Part III.

    Google Scholar 

  91. Studien ueber Entwicklungsgeschichte der Thiere. H. 2. Die Keimblaetter der Echinodermen, Wiesbaden, 1883.

    Google Scholar 

  92. Ibid.,S. 59.

    Google Scholar 

  93. Zool. Anzeiger,Bd. VII, 1884, S. 33.

    Google Scholar 

  94. Ibid.,S. 100.

    Google Scholar 

  95. On this occasion I would like to turn attention of my colleagues to the fact that a sea fauna in Tangere is quite poor by all means; during my 10-week stay there (from Decenber 1884 to February 1885 ) I caught from pelagic animals only one Beroe, several Pelagia, one completely degenerated kornerot and several Craspedota and Euphausia; as for a coastal fauna which can be studied only in time of extremely low tides it is quite poor too. As one more complication I have to mention an absence of experienced and reliable fishermen who could supply specimens difficult to obtain by researchers themselves.

    Google Scholar 

  96. Recherches sur la fecondation, 1879, p. 202.

    Google Scholar 

  97. Embryology of the Starfish,1864. Northamerican Starfishes,1877, Tab. 1, fig 24–28.

    Google Scholar 

  98. I have to mention in passing that the part played by these structures in the formation of the walls of the body cavity was not outlined by Al. Agassiz, as the Hertwig brothers claimed (Coelomtheorie,S. 127). This renowned American scientist mistook the described embryonic sacs for the water-vascular system, while I found, in 1868, that they form the walls of the cavity; in the same year, I argued for their morphological parallel with the gastrovascular apparatus (Bulletin de l’Acad. de St.Petersbourgh, 1968, XII, pp. 285, 298). I showed my preparations to my old friend A.Kovalevsky, with whom I was staying at that time in Messina, and he soon managed to extend this discovery to Sagitta. Since the Hertwig brothers’ mistake was adopted in other works (e.g. in Wadeyer’s paper in Deutsche med. Wochenschr.,N. 18, 1883), I have to draw attention to it.

    Google Scholar 

  99. Issledovaniya o razvitii meduz i sifonofor.

    Google Scholar 

  100. Ueber die Larve u. die Matamorphose der Echinodermen, Vierte Abhandlung,1852, S. 31.

    Google Scholar 

  101. Studien ueber die Entwicklungsgeschichte der Thiere. II Die Keimblaetter der Echinodermen, Wiesbaden, 1883, S. 44.

    Google Scholar 

  102. Usually stages of development are marked according to the time passed from the moment of their artificial fertilization. In the meantime, the latter depends more on external consditions. Thus, for instance, creation of wandering cells in Strong. lividus in December, when temperature in my Tanger’s laboratory (located in an attic) in December was often about 40, occured only thirty hours after fertilization, while in Villefranca in April, the same result was achieved in the same species in just fourteen hours.

    Google Scholar 

  103. Zool. Anzeiger,Bd. VII, 1884, S. 46.

    Google Scholar 

  104. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gourko, H., Williamson, D.I., Tauber, A.I. (2000). Comparative Embryological Studies (1881–1885). In: Gourko, H., Williamson, D.I., Tauber, A.I. (eds) The Evolutionary Biology Papers of Elie Metchnikoff. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 212. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9381-6_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9381-6_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5356-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-9381-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics