Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Jaakko Hintikka Selected Papers ((HISP,volume 5))

  • 321 Accesses

Abstract

The commensurability of two theories can be defined (relative to a given set of questions) as the ratio of the total information of their shared answers to the total information of the answers yielded by the two theories combined. Answers should be understood here as model consequences (in the sense of the author’s earlier papers), not deductive consequences. This definition is relative to a given model of the joint language of the theories, but can be generalized to sets of models. It turns out to capture also the idea of incommensurability as conceptual alienation. Incommensurability so defined does not imply incomparability.

Received May 1986; revised August 1986.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Fenstad, J.-E. (1980), “The Structure of Probabilities Defined on First-Order Languages”, in Richard C. Jeffrey (ed.), Studies in Inductive Logic and Probability, vol. 11. Berkeley: University of California Press, pp. 251–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hintikka, J. (1984a), “The Logic of Science as a Model-Oriented Logic”, in Peter Asquith (ed.), PSA 1984. East Lansing, Mich.: Philosophy of Science Association, pp. 177–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hintikka, J. (1984b), “Questioning as a Philosophical Method”, in J. H. Fetzer (ed.), Principles of Philosophical Reasoning. Totowa, N. J.: Rowman & Allanheld, pp. 25 – 43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hintikka, J. (1985), “A Spectrum of Logics of Questioning”, Philosophica35: 135–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hintikka, J., and Hintikka, M. (1982), “Sherlock Holmes Confronts Modern Logic: Towards a Theory of Information-Seeking By Questioning”, in E. M. Barth and J. L. Martens (eds.), Argumentation: Approaches to Theory Formation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 55–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laudan, L. (1977), Progress and Its Problems. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hintikka, J. (1999). On the Incommensurability of Theories. In: Inquiry as Inquiry: A Logic of Scientific Discovery. Jaakko Hintikka Selected Papers, vol 5. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9313-7_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9313-7_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5139-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-9313-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics