Skip to main content

Abstract

Recently, there has been much emphasis on increasing the learning capability and structural flexibility of neural networks (NNs). Optimization or self-tuning is often required for designs, planning of actions, motions and tasks In most cases, the ordinary control theory can not be easily applied, specially for real-time application which is affected by uncertain parameters and environment factors. An effective method to overcome this problem is to find the optimal or suboptimal solution by defining cost function and using NNs with parallel learning, and on-line processing, together with flexibility in structure, to operate in a way to minimize the cost function. Self-tuning control algorithms lack an intelligent ability to choose time varying parameters. It has been shown that the application of optimal approaches makes effective utilization of NNs for sensory, recognitory, and forecasting capabilities necessary in the robotic control. There are many examples of applications of optimization problems in literature [1]–[3]. From this chapter, we describe several learning models for NNs as controllers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. T. Shibata and T. Fukuda, “Neuromorphic control for robotic manipulators, position, force and impact control,” Proc. of Fifth IEEE International Symposium on Intelligent Control, Philadelphia, USA, pp. 310–315, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  2. P. P. Chu, “Using a Semi-asynchronous hopfield network to obtain optimal converge in logic minimization,” Proc. of IJCNN’91-Seattle, Vol. 1, pp. 141146, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  3. G. Fanner, “An algorithm-structured neural net for the shortest-path problem,” Proc. of IJCNN’91-Seattle, Vol. 1, pp. 153–158, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  4. D. Psaltis, A. Sideris, and A.A. Yamamura, “A Multilayered neural network controller,” IEEE Control Systems Magazine, pp. 17–20, April 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  5. K. J. Astrom, T. Hagglund, “Automatic tuning of PID controllers,” ISA, Research triangle park, NC, USA, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  6. K. J. Astrom, C. C. Hang and P. Person, “Heuristics for assessment of PID control with Ziegler-Nichols tuning,” Report, Coden: LUTFD2/TFRT-7404, Department of automatic control, Lund institute of technology, Lund, Sweden, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  7. K. J. Astrom, C. C. Hang, P. Person and Persson, “Towards intelligent PID control,” Automatica, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp. 1–9, 1992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. N. V. Bhat, P. A. Minderman, Jr. T. McAvoy, and N. S. Wang, “Modeling chemical process systems via neural computation,” IEEE Control Systems Magazine, pp. 24–30, April 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  9. T. McAvoy, N. Wang, S. Naidu, and N Bhat, “Use of neural nets for interpreting biosensor data,” Proc. Joint Conf. Neural Networks, Washington DC, pp. 1227–1233, June 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  10. K. Marzuki and S. Omatu, “Neural network controller for a temperature control system,” IEEE Control Systems Magazine, pp. 58–64, June 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  11. J. G. Ziegler and B. Nichols, “Optimal setting for automatic controllers,” Trans. ASME, Vol. 64, pp. 759–768, 1942.

    Google Scholar 

  12. M. Kawato, Y. Uno, M. Isobe and R. Suzuki, “A Hierarchical model for voluntary movement and its application to robotics,” Proc. of IEEE Inter. Conf. on Network, Vol. IV, pp. 573–582, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  13. D. W. Clark and P. J. Gawthrop, “Self-tuning controller,” Proc. Inst. Elec. Eng., Vol. 122, No. 9, pp. 929–934, 1975.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. D. W. Clark and P. J. Gawthrop, “Self-tuning control,” Proc. Inst. Elec. Eng., Vol. 126, No. 6, pp. 633–639, 1979.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. T. W. Kraus and T. J. Myron, “Self-tuning PID controller uses pattern recognition approach,” Control Eng., pp. 106–111, June 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  16. C. C. Hang, C. C. Lim, and S. H. Soon, “A new PID auto-tuner design based on correlation technique,” Proc. 2nd Multinational Instrumentation Conf., Peoples Republic of China, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  17. T. Hagglund and K. J. Astrom, “Automatic tuning of PID controllers based on dominant pole design,” Proc. of IFAC Conference on Adaptive Control pf Chemical Processes, Frankfurt, Germany, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  18. D. E. Rumelhart, G. E. Hinton and R. J. Williams, “Learning internal representations by error propagation,” in Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition, D. E. Rumelhart, and J. L. McClelland, Eds., Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, Vol. 1, pp. 318–362, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  19. W. Pitts and W. S. McCulloch, “How we know universals: the perception of auditory and visual forms,” Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics, Vol. 9, pp. 127–147, 1947.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. R. W. Swiniarski, “Neuromorphic self-tuning PID controller uses pattern recognition approach,” Proceeding of the 7th Internal Conference of Systems Engineering, pp. 18–20, July 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  21. M. Teshnehlab and K. Watanabe, “Neural networks-based self-tuning controller using the learning of SFs,” IEEE/ Nagoya University World Wisemen Women Workshop (WWW), pp. 31–38, Oct. 1993.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Teshnehlab, M., Watanabe, K. (1999). Self-Tuning PID Control. In: Intelligent Control Based on Flexible Neural Networks. International Series on Microprocessor-Based and Intelligent Systems Engineering, vol 19. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9187-4_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9187-4_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5207-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-9187-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics