Skip to main content

Weak and Strong Polarity: Evidence from Greek

  • Chapter
  • 173 Accesses

Part of the book series: Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory ((SNLT,volume 43))

Abstract

This paper highlights some central aspects of negative polarity and negative concord in Greek (Gr). The principal goal is to attempt a solution to the so-called diversity problem,i.e. to the fact not all polarity items are licensed in the same environments, by motivating, on both syntactic and semantic grounds, a distinction between strong and weak polarity licensing. The proposal builds on a conjecture expressed in Ladusaw (1992, 1994) that there might be two mechanisms involved in the licensing of negative polarity items (NPIs) and negative indefinites. I will show that in Gr strong and weak licensing are explicitly marked at s-structure by means of emphatic stress. It will be suggested that the analysis presented here can prove helpful in accounting for the diverse distribution of NPIs in languages other than Gr.

I want to express my gratitude to a number of people for encouragement and comments: Elena Anagnostopoulou, Donka Farkas, Jack Hoeksema, Sabine Iatridou, Sila Klidi, Bill Ladusaw, Jason Merchant, Josep Quer, and Frans Zwarts. My thanks also to the audience of the Workshop on Greek Syntax in Berlin and to Artemis Alexiadou for organising an exciting Workshop and for giving us all the chance to be there.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aquaviva, P. (1993) The Logical Form of Negation. A Study of Operator-Variable Structures in Syntax, Ph.D. Dissertation, Scuola Normale Superiore, Pisa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atlas, J. (1996) A typology of negative quantifier noun phrases, or What did they mean, “Don’t be so negative !”?, unpublished manuscript, Pomona College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Condoravdi, C. (1994) Descriptions in Contexts, Ph.D. Dissertation, Yale University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, Oe. (1970) Some Notes on Indefinites, Language 46, 33–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Déprez, V. (1995) The Roots of Negative Concord in French and French based Creoles, to appear in Parametric Approaches to Creole Syntax, M. deGraff (ed.), MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farkas, D.F. (1992) On the Semantics of Subjunctive Complements, in Hirschbuehler P. et al.(eds), Romance Languages and Modern Linguistic Theory, John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 69–104. Farkas, D. F. ( 1994 ) Specificity and Scope, unpublished manuscript, UCSC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giannakidou, A. (1993) KANIS/kanis, a Case of Polarity Sensitivity in Modem Greek, Studies in Greek Linguistics 14, 130–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giannakidou, A. (1994a) The Semantic Licensing of NPIs and the Modem Greek Subjunctive, Language and Cognition 4, 55–68, Yearbook of the Research Group for Theoretical and Experimental Linguistics, University of Groningen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giannakidou, A. (1995) Subjunctive, Habituality and the Licensing of NPIs, Proceedings of SALT V, 13 2150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giannakidou, A.(1997) The Landscape of Polarity Items, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Groningen. Giannakidou, A. & J. Quer. (1995) Two Mechanisms for the Licensing of Negative Indefinites, FLSM VI. Papers from the 6th Annual Meeting of the Formal Linguistics Society of Midamerica, ed. L. Gabriele et al, IULC Publications, Bloomington, Indiana, pp. 103–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giannakidou, A. & J. Quer (to appear) Long-distance Licensing of Negative Indefinites, in Negation: Syntax and Semantics,P. Hirschbuhler et al. (eds), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haegeman, L. (1995) The Syntax of Negation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Haegeman, L. & R Zanuttini (199) Negative Heads and the Neg-criterion, The Linguistic Review 8 233251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn, L. (1972) On the Semantic Properties of Logical Operators in English, Ph.D. Dissertation, UCLA. Heim, I. ( 1982 ) The Semantics of Definite and Indefinite NPs, PhD Dissertation, UMass, Amherst

    Google Scholar 

  • Heim, I. (1984) A Note on Negative Polarity and Downward Entailingness, Proceedings of NELS 14, 98–107. Umass, Amherst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Israel, M. (1994) Polarity Sensitivity as Lexical Semantics, unpublished manuscript, UCSD. Kadmon, N. & Landman, F. (1993) Any, Linguistics and Philosophy 15, 353–422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klidi, S. (1994) ETOLxela Apvrin cqç IIoXKerrrl raS, Apvrl ru of IIoaoSsúcrcç Ka Aevrinxot Taacaré* Néci E7 Invadc, Studies in Greek Linguistics 15, 451–461.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klima, E.S. (1964) Negation in English, in J. Fodor and G. Katz (eds.), The Structure of Language, Prentice Hall, New York. pp. 246–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krifka, M. (1994) The Semantics and Pragmatics of Weak and Strong Polarity Items in Assertion, Proceedings of SALT IV, 195–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krifka, Manfred et allii. (1995) Genericity. An introduction, In G. Carlson and F.G. Pelletier (eds), The Generic Book. Chicago University Press, Chicago, pp. 1–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuroda, S-Y. (1992) Japanese Syntax and Semantics, Reidel, Dordrecht

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ladusaw, W.A. (1980) Polarity Sensitivity as Inherent Scope Relations, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladusaw, W.A. (1992) Expressing Negation, Proceedings of SALT II, 237–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladusaw, W.A. (1994) Thetic & Categorical, Stage & Individual, Weak & Strong, Proceedings of SALT W, 220–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laka, I. (1990) Negation in Syntax: the Nature of Functional Categories and Projections, Ph.D. Dissertation, MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Yung-Suk & Larry Horn (1995) Any as Indefinite plus even, unpublished manuscript, Yale University. Linebarger, M. ( 1980 ) The Grammar of Negative Polarity, Ph.D. Dissertation, MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCawley, J.D. (1980) Everything that Linguists have always wanted to know about Logic (and were afraid to ask), Basil Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montague, Richard. 1969 On the Nature of certain Philosophical Entities, The Monist 53, 159–94, Reprinted in 1974 in Formal Philosophy. Selected papers of Richard Montague, R.H.Thomason (ed), Yale University Press, New Haven, pp. 148–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quer, J. (1993) The Syntactic Licensing of Negative Items, MA thesis, Autonomous University of Barcelona.

    Google Scholar 

  • Philippaki-Warburton, I. & Veloudis, J. (1984) The Subjunctive in Complement Clauses, Studies in Greek Linguistics 5, 87–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Progovac, L. (1988) A Binding Approach to Polarity Sensitivity, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Southern California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Progovac, L. (1994) Positive and Negative Polarity: a Binding approach, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Reinhart, T. (1982) Pragmatics and Linguistics: an Analysis of Sentence Topics, Philosophica 27, 53–94. Rizzi, L. (1991) Relativized Minimality,MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strawson, P.F. (1954) Identifying Reference and Truth-values, Reprinted in D. Steinberg et al. (eds), Semantic,s Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 86–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tovena, L. (1996) Issues on Polarity Sensitivity, Ph.D.Dissertation, University of Edinburgh. Veloudis, I. ( 1981 ) Negation in Modern Greek. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Reading.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, Karina. (1991) Studies in the Semantics of Generic Noun Phrases, Ph.D. Dissertation, UMAss, Amherst.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Wouden, T. (1994) Negative Contexts, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Groningen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zanuttini, R (1991) Syntactic Properties of Sentential Negation: a Comparative Study of Romance Languages, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwarts, Frans. (1986) Categoriale Grammatica en Algebraische Semantiek. Een studie naar negatie en polariteit in het Nederlands, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Groningen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwarts, F. (1993) Three types of Polarity, to appear in F. Hamn and E. Hinrichs (eds), Semantics. Zwarts, F. (1995) Nonveridical Contexts, Linguistic Analysis 25, 286–312.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Giannakidou, A. (1999). Weak and Strong Polarity: Evidence from Greek. In: Alexiadou, A., Horrocks, G., Stavrou, M. (eds) Studies in Greek Syntax. Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, vol 43. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9177-5_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9177-5_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5117-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-9177-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics