Advertisement

Coronal Hole Boundaries and their Interactions with Adjacent Regions

Chapter
  • 119 Downloads

Abstract

Coronal hole boundaries are the interfaces between regions where the coronal magnetic field contains a significant component which is open into the heliosphere and regions where the field is primarily closed. It is pointed out that there are constraints on the magnetic field which opens into the heliosphere that must be satisfied in the corona: it must come into pressure equilibrium in the high corona, and the component of the field which connects to the polar regions of the Sun must differentially rotate. A model is presented in which satisfying these constraints determines which field lines are open and which are closed, and thus where the polar coronal hole boundaries occur. Some of the consequences of this model are discussed.

Key words

coronal holes solar wind Ulysses 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Axford, W. I.: 1977, in Study of Travelling Interplanetary Phenomena, eds. M. A. Shea, et al., (Dordrecht: D. Reidel), p. 145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bird, M. K., and Edenhofer, P.: 1990, in Physics of the Inner Heliosphere I, ed. R. Schwenn and E. Marsh, (Springer-Verlag: Berlin).Google Scholar
  3. Fisk, L. A.: 1996, J. Geophys. Res., 101, 15547.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Fisk, L. A., Zurbuchen, T. H., and Schwadron, N. A.: 1999, Astrophys. J., in press.Google Scholar
  5. Geiss, J., Gloeckler, G., and von Steiger, R.: 1994, Space Sci. Rev., 72, 49.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Nash, A. G., Sheeley N. R. Jr., and Wang, Y.-M.: 1988, Solar Phys., 117, 359.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Parker, E. N.: 1958, Astrophys. J., 128, 664.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Phillips, J. L., et al.: 1995, Geophys. Res. Lett., 22, 3301.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Roelof, E. C., et al.: 1997, J. Geophys. Res., 102, 251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Schrijver, et al.: 1997, Astrophys. J., 487, 424.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Schwadron, N. A., Fisk, L. A., and Zurbuchen, T. H.: 1999, Astrophys. J., in press.Google Scholar
  12. Shultz, M.: 1973, Astrophys. Space Sci., 34, 371.ADSGoogle Scholar
  13. Smith, E. J., and Balogh, A.: 1995, Geophys. Res., 101, 24349.Google Scholar
  14. Smith, E. J., Tsurutani, B. T., and Rosenberg, R. L.: 1978, J. Geophys. Res., 83, 717.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Snodgrass, H. B.: 1983, Astrophys. J., 270, 288.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Suess, S. T., McComas, D. J., and Hoeksema, J. T.: 1993, Geophys. Res. Lett., 20, 161.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Suess, S. T.: 1999, Adv.. in Space Res., in press.Google Scholar
  18. Wang, Y.-M., Sheeley Jr., N. R., Nash, A. G., and Shampline, L. R.: 1988, Astrophys. J., 327, 427.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Wang, Y.-M., and Sheeley, Jr., N. R.: 1993, Astrophys. J., 414, 916.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Wang, Y.-M., Hawley, S. H., and Sheeley, Jr., N. R.: 1996, Science, 271, 464.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Zurbuchen, T. H., Schwadron, N. A., and Fisk, L. A.: 1997, J. Geophys. Res., 102, 24175.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Atmospheric, Oceanic and Space SciencesUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborUSA

Personalised recommendations