Abstract
One of the grave problems created by the transformation process is the imbalance in the demographic structure of the research system. An imbalanced age structure threatens the continuity of research productivity and development. Some figures are truly dramatic. In the Ukrainian institute of physics the percentage of researchers younger than 35 made up 23. 2% of the total number of researchers in 1990 but as few as 10% in 1994. In the Russian institute of economics there are about 230 researchers, half of whom are older than 50 and only 16% are younger than 40. In the Hungarian institute of solid state research researchers older than 40 constitute 60% of staff while only 10% are younger than 30.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Analytical Centre for Science and Industry Policy (1996). Mobility of scientific personnel in Russia. Moscow: Analytical Centre for Science and Industry Policy (in Russian).
International Science Foundation (1995). 1994 Annual Report. Washington, DC: ISF.
Kuhn, Thomas (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions, 2nd ed.. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Lehmann, N. C. (1953). >Age and achievement. Princeton, NJ: University of Princeton Press.
Levin, Stephan, Paula Levin, & Sharon Levin (1993). Age and the Nobel prize revisited. Scien-tometrics 28, 387–399.
Messeri, Peter (1988). Age differences in the reception of new scientific theories: The case of plate tectonics. Social Studies of Science 18,101–121.
Mikulinski, S. (ed.), (1977). Scientific schools. Moscow: Nauka (in Russian).
Nesvetailov, G. A. (1986). Intensification of academic science. Minsk: Nauka i technika (in Russian).
Pelz, Donald C., & Frank M. Andrews (1996). Scientists in Organizations. Productive Climates for Research and Development. New York: Wiley.
Radulescu, Dan (1995). Romanian youth and scientific research. Academies in transformation. Higher Education in Europe 20,220–229.
Rappa, M., & K. Debackere (1993). Youth and scientific innovation; the role of young scientists in the development of a new field. Minerva, 1,1–20.
Schweitzer, G. E. (1995). Can research and development recover in Russia? Technology in Society 17,121–142.
Simonton, D. K. (1988). Age and outstanding achievement: what do we know after a century of research? Psychological Bulletin 104, 251–267.
Stankiewicz, R. (1979). The size and age of Swedish academic research groups and their scientific performance. In UNESCO (ed.), Scientific productivity. The effectiveness of research groups in six countries (pp. 191–222). Paris: UNESCO/Cambridge University Press.
Stewart, John A. (1986). Drifting continents and colliding paradigms: a quantitative application of the interests perspective. Social Studies of Science 16, 261–279.
UNESCO (ed.), (1979). Scientific productivity. The effectiveness of research groups in six countries. Paris: UNESCO/Cambridge University Press.
Zuckerman, H., & Robert K. Merton (1972). Age, aging structure in science. In M. W. Riley, M. Johnson, & A. Foner (eds.), Aging and society, Vol. 3: A sociology of age stratification (pp. 292–356). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1998 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Nesvetailov, G.A. (1998). Compromised Futures: The Consequences of an Aging Research Staff. In: Mayntz, R., Schimank, U., Weingart, P. (eds) East European Academies in Transition. Sociology of the Sciences Library, vol 1. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9121-8_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9121-8_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5065-6
Online ISBN: 978-94-015-9121-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive