Skip to main content

Part of the book series: NATO ASI Series ((ASIC,volume 507))

  • 283 Accesses

Abstract

Virtually all direct methods techniques are multisolutional: they produce more than one phase set, and, indeed, often produce thousands and even more. The problem then arises as to how to establish which phase set is correct in the sense of having the lowest phase error (assuming there is such a set). To do this, figures of merit (FOMs) are used in which the phases are tested against invariants and seminvariants to establish consistency criteria. It is the purpose of this chapter to examine such criteria, and to look critically at their efficacy in a macromolecular phasing environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Cascarano, G. and Giacovazzo, C. (1995) The joint probability distribution of any set of phases given any set of diffraction magnitudes. IV The active use of psi-zero triplets Acta Cryst A51, 820–825.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cascarano, G., Giacovazzo, C., and Guagliardi, A. (1992) Improved figures of merit for direct methods Acta Cryst. A48, 859–865.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Giacovazzo, C., Siliqi, D. and Spagna, R. (1994) The ab initio structure solution of protein structures by direct methods II. The procedure and its first applications Acta Cryst. A50, 609–621.

    Google Scholar 

  4. DeTitta, G.T., Weeks, CM., Thulman, P., Miller, R, and Hauptman, H.A. (1994) Structure solution by minimal-function phase refinement and Fourier filtering. I. Theoretical basis Acta Cryst. A50, 203–210.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Weeks, CM., Hauptman, H.A., Smith, G.D., Blessing, R.H., Teeter, M.M. and Miller, R. (1995) Crambin: a direct solution for a 400 atom structure Acta Cryst. D51, 33–38.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hauptman, H.A. (1996) The SAS maximal principle: a new approach to the phase problem Acta Cryst. A52, 490–496.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Brünger, A.T. (1993) Assessment of phase accuracy by cross validation: The free R value, methods and applications Acta Cryst. D49, 24–36.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bricogne, G. (1984) Maximum entropy and the foundations of direct methods Acta Cryst. A40, 410–445.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bricogne, G. and Gilmore, CJ. (1990) A multisolution method of phase determination by combined maximisation of entropy and likelihood. I. Theory, algorithms and strategy Acta Cryst. A46, 284–297.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bricogne, G. (1988) A Bayesian statistical theory of the phase problem. I. A multichannel maximum entropy formalism for constructing generalized joint probability distributions of structure factors Acta Cryst. A44 (1988). 517–545.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Bricogne, G. (1993) Direct phase determination by entropy maximisation and likelihood ranking: status report and perspectives Acta Cryst. D49, 37–60.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gilmore, C.J., Nicholson, W.V., and Dorset, D.L., (1996) Direct methods in protein electron crystallography: the ab initio structure determination of two membrane protein structures in projection using maximum entropy and likelihood, Acta Cryst. A52, 937–946.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lemaréchal, C and Navaza, J. (1991) On the ab initio phase determination by maximum entropy Acta Cryst. A47, 631–632.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Prince, E. (1993) Construction of maximum-entropy density maps, and their use in phase determination and extension. Acta Cryst. D49, 61–65.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gilmore, C.J., Shankland, K. and Bricogne, G. (1993) Applications of the maximum entropy method to powder diffraction and electron crystallography Proc.Roy.Soc.Ser. A. 442,97–111.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. Shankland, K., Gilmore, C.J., Bricogne G. and Hashizume, H. (1993) A multisolution method of phase determination by combined maximisation of entropy and likelihood. V Automatic Likelihood analysis via the student t-test, with an application to the powder structure of magnesium boron nitride, Mg3BN3 Acta Cryst. A49,493–501.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sato, T. (1992) Maximum entropy method: phase refinement Acta Cryst. A48, 842–850.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Havelka, W.A., Henderson, R., Heymann, J.A.W, and Osterhelt, D. (1993) Projection structure of halorhodopsin from Halobacterium halobium at 6Å resolution obtained by electron cryo-microscopy J. Mol.Biol. 234, 837–846.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sayre, D. (1993) Discussion after talk by J.M.Stewart Acta Cryst. D49, 107

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gilmore, C.J. (1998). Figures of Merit for Evaluating Phases. In: Fortier, S. (eds) Direct Methods for Solving Macromolecular Structures. NATO ASI Series, vol 507. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9093-8_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9093-8_15

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4994-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-9093-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics