Abstract
The traditional dualism of reform or revolution has been used to rank, in hierarchical terms, how much change is accomplished by a certain collective political struggle during a particular period of time. Reform generally refers to minor and temporary changes in the laws or legal/legislative system; revolution, in contrast, generally refers to a more radical and permanent political change in the political/economic structures of a society. Thus, if we mobilize and struggle to change educational policies or health policies by lobbying for new laws, we would be labeled reformers. If, however, we organize to change our democratic form of government to a monarchy, a dictatorship, or an oligarchy—or shift from a socialist economy controlled by the government to a free enterprise system—our efforts, if successful, would be called a revolution. It is clear that the American, French, Russian, Chinese, and Spanish revolutions brought about dramatic transformations in the political systems of their respective countries.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
See Ralph B. Smith ed., The Subtle Revolution: Women at Work (Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press, 1979), p. lx. He states, “We are undergoing a revolution—at times obvious, at times only dimly perceived—in the traditional relationship of women to work, money, marriage and family.”
For example, see the work of Kathleen B. Jones and Anna G. Jonasdottir eds., The Political Intent of Gender (London: Sage, 1988)
Sarah Evans, Personal Politics: The Root of Women’s Liberation in the Civil Rights Movement and the New Left (New York: Vintage, 1980)
Jane S. Jacquette ed., Women in Politics (New York: John Wylie and Sons, 1974).
A version of the following was published in Lisa Albrecht and Rosa M. Brewer eds., Bridges to Power: Building Women’s Multicultural Alliance (Philadelphia: New Society Publishers, 1990).
See Guida West and Rhoda Lois Blumberg eds., Women and Social Protest (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990).
For a more detailed analysis of this movement, see Guida West, The National Welfare Rights Movement: The Social Protest of Poor Women (New York: Praeger, 1981).
See West, The National Welfare Rights Movement.
Gayle Kirshenbaum, “Why all but One Woman Senator Voted Against Welfare,” Ms. (March/April 1996), p. 10.
Heidi Hartmann et al., “Bringing Together Feminist Theory and Practice: A Collective Interview,” Signs (Summer 1996) Vol. 21, No. 4, p. 926.
See, “Women Leaders Meet with the President,” In Brief, NOW Legal Defense and Educational Fund (Spring 1996), p. 1; also, Martha F. Davis and Pamela Coukos, “The Scope and Application of the Family Violence Option,” NOW Legal Defense and Education Fund (October 1996), pp. 1–8 and its covering memo (n.d.).
Quote by Professor Joan Meier, Director of the Domestic Violence Advocacy Project, George Washington University National Law Center, in NOW LDEF Report of “A Leadership Summit: The Link between Violence and Poverty in the Lives of Women and their Children,” April 28, 1995, George Washington University Law Center, Washington, D.C., on cover.
I co-chair, along with Professors Ruth Brandwein (SUNY at Stony Brook) and Wendy Mink (UCLA at Santa Cruz), the Women’s Committee of One Hundred. Its founder is Professor Eva Kittay (SUNY at Stony Brook). It is a broad and diverse national network of academic women, social workers, students, writers and some welfare rights mothers. Terri Scofield, founder and leader of the Welfare Warriors of Suffolk County, New York, is a Steering Committee member. Marian Kramer, President of the National Welfare Rights Union, is a founding member of the network. Several other welfare rights leaders from across the country have joined the network.
Kirshenbaum, “Why All but One Women Senator Voted Against Welfare.”
Some feminist theorists and practitioners question the concept of one single women’s movement and see it more as various groups of women in a movement that appears to be focused on issues that empower women and/or bring about greater equality with men. See discussion in Hartmann, “Bringing Together Feminist Theory and Practice.”
Kirshenbaum, “Why All but One Women Senator Voted Against Welfare.”
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1998 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
West, G. (1998). Women in the Welfare Rights Movement: Reform or Revolution?. In: Diamond, M.J. (eds) Women and Revolution: Global Expressions. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9072-3_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9072-3_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5073-1
Online ISBN: 978-94-015-9072-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive