Abstract
Uneven-aged stands are diverse, both in spatial distribution of trees and in tree characteristics. The structures and natural processes in these stands are hard to describe, as are the planned and executed silvicultural operations. For clear and objective management planning in uneven-aged stands it has often been suggested to use diversity indices to describe aspects of stand structure such as diversity in species and size. However, an understanding of the meaning of these one-dimensional measures is complicated by i) the ambiguity of the concept of diversity, ii) the great diversity in structures, dynamics and silvicultural operations in uneven-aged stands, and iii) the indices’ dependence on sampling design. Most diversity indices require the user to have sound theoretical and empirical knowledge.
The meaning given to an index is a particular viewpoint of reality unique to each individual, depending on personal theoretical and empirical knowledge of the index, and the variable context in which the index is understood. From this viewpoint the objectivity of indices rests solely at the debate among the manager and others involved, converging to a consensus on the meaning of an index.
Introducing diversity indices into forest management in the Netherlands requires care and thought, as well as the involvement of managers and other potential users. A number of selection criteria are recommended for choosing useful indices to describe aspects of structure. Given that few data are available in the Netherlands and that there is little empirical knowledge, special attention should be given to learn using the selected diversity indices from experience.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Albert, M., Gadow, K. von, and Kramer, H. 1996. Zur Strukturbeschreibung in Douglasien-Jungbeständen am Beispiel der Versuchsflächen Manderscheid und Uslar. Allg. For. Jag. Zeit. (166): 205–210.
Bongers, F., Popma, J., Meave del Castillo, J., and Carabias, J. 1988. Structure and floristic composition of the lowland rain forest of Los Tuxtlas, Mexico. Vegetatio. (74): 55–80.
Bos, J. and Hekhuis, H.J. 1991. Beheersplanning bos met meervoudige functievervulling: doeloperationalisering en technische produktiefuncties. Report 671. Institute for Forest and Nature Research. Wageningen. The Netherlands.
Boud, D., Cohen, R., and Walker, D. (eds.). 1993. Using Experience for Learning, SHRE and Open University Press. Buckingham. United Kingdom.
Buongiorno, J., Peyron, J., Houllier, F. and Bruciamacchie, M. 1995. Growth and Management of Mixed Species, Uneven-Aged Forests in the French Jura: Implications for Economic Returns and tree Diversity. For. Sc. (41): 397–429.
Cox, F. 1971. Dichtebestimmungen und Strukturanalyse von Pflanzenpopulationen mit Hilfe von Abstandmessungen. PhD-thesis, Forestry Faculty. University of Göttingen. Germany.
Davis, K.P., and Johnson, K.N. 1987. Forest Management. McGraw-Hill. USA.
Gadow, K. von. 1993. Management-base Control Inventory. In: Vanclay, J.K., Skovsgaard, J.P. and Gertner, G.Z. (eds.). Growth and Yield Estimation from Successive Forest Inventories. Proceedings IUFRO Conference. Forskningsserien 3. Forest and Landscape Research Institute and Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University. Denmark. Pp. 25–30.
Gadow, K, von. 1994. Modelling Growth in Managed Forests - Realism and limits of lumping. Paper for the NATO Advanced Workshop on Ecosystem Modelling. 21st February 1994. Bischofsgrtin. 16 p.
Gadow, K. von, and Füldner, K. 1994. How to define a thinning in a mixed deciduous beech forest. In: Pinto da Costa, M.E. and Preuhsler, T. (eds.). Mixed Stands. Proceedings IUFRO working groups 54:01–03 and S4.01–04. Universida Tecnica de Lisboa. Lisbon. Portugal. Pp. 31–42.
Gadow, K. von, and Fiildner, K. 1995. Zur Beschreibung forstlicher Eingriffe. Forstw. Cbl. (114): 151–159.
Glaser, E.M., Abelson, H.H. and Garrison, K.N. 1983. Putting knowledge into use - facilitating the diffusion of knowledge and the implementation of planned change. Jossey-Bass Inc. San Francisco. USA.
Grassle, J.F., Patil, G.P., Smith, W., and Taillie, C. 1979. (eds.). Ecological Diversity in Theory and Practice. Statistical ecology. Volume 6. International Co-operative Publishing House.
Maryland. USA. Hekhuis, H.J. 1991. Oorzaken van verschillen in exploitatieresultaat tussen particuliere bosbedrijven. Nederlands Bosbouwtijdschrift. (63): 186–193.
Hendrickson Jr., J.A. 1979. Estimates of species diversity from multiple samples. In: Grassle, J.F., Patil, G.P., Smith, W. and Taillie, C. (eds.). Ecological Diversity in Theory and Practice. Statistical ecology. Volume 6. International Co-operative Publishing House. Maryland. USA. Pp. 145–158.
Hinrichs, A. 1995. Assessment of Information Systems from the management viewpoint: a contribution to the discussion about the usefulness of Geographic Information Systems in forest enterprises. Allg. For. Jag. Zeit. (166): 225–229.
Höher, G.C. 1994. Waldbauliche Untersuchungen zur Enstehung, Struktur und Weiterentwicklung der Erdmannbestände im Forstamt Erdmannshausen. Erdmannshausen. Germany.
Hurlbert, S.H. 1971. The non-concept of species diversity: a critique and alternative parameters. Ecology. (52): 577–586.
Jagt, J.L., Jans, M.F.F.W., and Paasman, J.M. 1996. Geintegreerd bosbeheer ingekleurd. Volume B-17. IKCNatuurbeheer. Wageningen. The Netherlands.
Kelty, M.J., Larson, B.C. and Oliver, C.D. (eds.) 1992. The Ecology and Silviculture of Mixed Species Forest. Forestry Sciences. Volume 40. Kluwer Academic Publishers. Dordrecht. The Netherlands.
Klingen, S. and Sevenster, J. 1991. Geintegreerd Bosbeheer. Natuur en Milieu Overijssel. Zwolle. The Netherlands.
Knuchel, H. 1953. Planning and control in the managed forest. Oliver and Boyd. Edinburgh. United Kingdom.
Köhl, M., and Zingg, A. 1995. Eignung von Diversitätsindizes bei Langzeituntersuchungen zur Biodiversität in Waldbeständen. Allg. For. Jag. Zeit. (167): 76–85.
Leibundgut, H. 1977. Über die Notwendigkeit naturnahen Waldbaues. Schw. Z. f. Fw. (128): 490–501.
Magurran, A.E. 1988. Ecological Diversity and Its Measurement. Croom Helm. London. United Kingdom.
Magnussen, S., and Boyle, T.J.B. 1995. Estimating sample size for inference about the Shannon-Weaver and the Simpson indices of species diversity. For. Ecol. Man. (78): 71–84.
Meer, P.J. van de, Bongers, F, Chatrou, L., and Riéra, B. 1994. Defining gaps in tropical forests. Acta Oecologia. (15): 701–714.
Nagel, J. 1994. Structural analyses of the forest reserve Saubrink on the basis of a permanent sample plot data. In Pinto da Costa, M.E. and Preuhsler, T. (eds.). Mixed Stands. Proceedings IUFRO working groups S4.01–03 and S4.01–04. Universida Tecnica de Lisboa. Lisbon. Portugal. Pp. 81–96.
Oldeman, R.A.A. 1990. Forests: Elements of Silvology. Springer Verlag. Berlin. Germany.
Oliver, C.D. and Larson, B.C. 1990. Forest Stand Dynamics. Biological Resource Management Series. McGraw-Hill. New York. USA.
Patil, G.P., and Taillie, C. 1982. Diversity as a concept and its measurement. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. (77): 548–561.
Peet, R.K. 1974. The measurement of species diversity. Ann. Rev. Ec. Sys. (5): 285–307.
Peet, R.K. 1975. Relative diversity indices. Ecology. (56): 496–498.
Pretzsch, H. 1993. Analyse und Reproduktion räumlicher Bestandesstrukturen. Schriften aus der Forstlichen Fakultät der Universität Göttingen und der Niedersächsischen Forstlichen Versuchsanstalt. Göttingen. Germany. Volume 114.
Schoonderwoerd, H. and Klein, J.P.G. de. 1993. Inventarisatie van kleinschalig bos. Nederlands Bosbouwtijdschrift. (65): 100–109.
Smith, W., Grassle, J.F. and Kravitz, D. 1979. Measures of diversity with unbiased estimates. In: Grassle, J.F., Patil, G.P., Smith, W. and Taillie, C. (eds.). Ecological Diversity in Theory and Practice. Statistical ecology.. International Co-operative Publishing House. Maryland. USA. Volume 6. Pp. 177–191.
Spellerberg, I.F. 1991. Monitoring Ecological Change. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge. United Kingdom.
Swindel, B.F., Conde, L.F. and Smith, J.E. 1984. Species diversity: concept, measurement, and response to clearcutting and site-preparation. For. Ecol. Man. (8): 11–22.
Vanclay, J.K. 1994. Modelling forest growth and yield, applications to mixed tropical forests. CAB International. Wallingford. United Kingdom.
Vries, P.G. de. 1986. Sampling Theory for Forest Inventory. Springer Verlag. Berlin. Germany.
Wenk, G., Anatanaitis, V. and Smelko, S. 1990. Waldertragslehre. Deutscher Wirtschaftsverlag Berlin. Berlin. Germany.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1998 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Heusèrr, M.J.J. (1998). Putting Diversity Indices into Practice. In: Bachmann, P., Köhl, M., Päivinen, R. (eds) Assessment of Biodiversity for Improved Forest Planning. Forestry Sciences, vol 51. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9006-8_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9006-8_16
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4962-9
Online ISBN: 978-94-015-9006-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive