Abstract
Environmental security must be part of both national and global security concepts. In the long run, no country can achieve true national security unless the national security of other countries is safeguarded as well. Many conflicts are rooted in environmental degradation and resource scarcities. Responsible, long-term natural resources management is a key to environmental security. Environmental security threats are most often cross-border in nature. Together with other sources of tension, such as poverty, social inequity and ethnic intolerance, they may lead to violent conflicts. This makes it even more important to prevent such threats from arising. Agenda 21 concluded that the major cause of the continued degradation of the global environment is unsustainable patterns of consumption and production. Further, it highlighted the special responsibility of the developed world to take the lead in making changes. Changes in both patterns and volumes of consumption are needed, together with changes in the distribution of consumption. International agreements must be more than expression of good intentions. We need clearly defined commitments, effective monitoring, follow-up systems that hold countries accountable and procedures for settling disputes. We need a stronger UN to devise solutions to global challenges. The UN must become a driving force for sustainable development and global security. Our common future calls for both responses at local, national and regional levels and a return to multilateralism.
This chapter is a revised version of the opening address at the NATO Advanced Research Workshop at Bolkesje, Norway, 12 June 1996.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Brundtland, Gro H. et al., 1987. Our Common Future. Oxford: Oxford University Press, for the World Commission on Environment and Development.
NATO, 1995a. Pilot Study: Crossborder Environmental Problems Emanating from Defence-related Installations and Activities. Final Report Phase I, vol. 1, Radioactive Contamination. NATO Report no. 204. Brussels: NATO/Committee on the Challenges of Modern Society/North Atlantic Cooperation Council.
NATO, 1995b. Pilot Study: Crossborder Environmental Problems Emanating from Defence-related Installations and Activities. Final Report Phase I, vol. 2, Chemical Contamination. NATO Report no. 205. Brussels: NATO/ Committee on the Challenges of Modem Society/North Atlantic Cooperation Council.
Norway—Russia, 1996. Joint Norwegian-Russian Expert Group for Investigation of Radioactive Contamination in the Northern Areas. Results from Three Years of Investigations (1992–94) in the Kara Sea. Osterâs: Norwegian Radiaton Protection Authority.
Norwegian government, 1995. Plan of Action for the Implementation of Government Report no. 34 (1993–94) to the Storting on Nuclear Activities and Chemical Weapons in Areas Adjacent to Our Northern Borders. Oslo: Ministry of Foreign Affairs. St. m. 34 (1993–94).
UN, 1992a. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), June. New York: United Nations. A/AC. 237/18.
UN, 1992b. Agenda 21 (The United Nations Programme of Action from Rio de Janeiro), June. New York: United Nations. DPI/1344.
UN 1996. Climate Change 1995: Second Assessment Report. UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. New York: United Nations.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1997 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Stub, S. (1997). Our Future — Common, or None at All. In: Gleditsch, N.P. (eds) Conflict and the Environment. NATO ASI Series, vol 33. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8947-5_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8947-5_1
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4924-7
Online ISBN: 978-94-015-8947-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive