Skip to main content

From “Privacy” to the Leviathan State The case of the child

  • Chapter
The European Family
  • 72 Accesses

Abstract

The title to this chapter suggests a straightforward development of the relationship between the child and society: a progression from a time when that relationship was a purely private matter, mainly between the child and its parents, to the present, when the child’s primary relationships are significantly controlled by the state. This thesis is reinforced by changes in the laws of many western European countries which have occurred over the past twenty or so years. Legal terms like puissance paternelle, elterliche Gewalt or parental rights have been replaced by autorité parentale, elterliche Sorge or parental responsibility (Frank, 1990; Rubellin-Devichi, 1994). The welfare of the child is everywhere proclaimed as an overriding legal principle. This seems to indicate an abandonment of a regime where parents had (almost) unrestricted power over their children for one in which parents are subjected to rigorous supervision by a state anxious to enhance children’s welfare at all times. English courts have pushed this new rhetoric so far that some judges seem reluctant to refer to parents’ rights altogether. Instead, we have the assertion of an all-embracing duty on the legal system to promote the best interests of the children.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alston (P), Parker (S) and Seymour (J), 1992, Children, Rights and the Law, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Achard David, 1993,Children: Rights and Childhood,Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ariès (P), 1960, L’enfant et la vie familiale sous l’Ancien Régime, Plon, Paris. Traduction anglaise, 1962, Centuries of Childhood, Jonathan Cape, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey (M), “ England’s first custody of Infants Act “, inédit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bainham (A), 1994, “ Growing up in Britain: Adolescence in the Post-Gillick Era “ in J. EEKELAAR and P. SARCEVIC (eds), Parenthood in Modern Society: Social and Legal Issues for the Twenty-First Century, Martinus Nijhoff, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belembaogo (A), 1994, “ The Best Interests of the Child — The case of Burkina Faso “, International Jourtnal of Law and The Family,8, pp.201–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boswell (J), 1988, The Kindness of Strangers, Pantheon, New-york.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Mause (L), 1976, The History of Childhood, Souvenir Press, London. Department of Health and Social Security, 1985, Review of Child Care Law, Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dingwall (R), Eekelaar (J) and Topsy (M), 1983, The Protection of Children: State Intervention and Family Life, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dingwall (R) and Eekelaar (J), 1988, “ Families and the State: an Historical Perspective on the Public Regulation of Private Conduct “, Law and Policy, 10,pp. 341–361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donzelot (J), 1980, The Policing of Families: Welfare versus the State, Hutchinson, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan (W), 1994, “ The Constitutional Position of Parental Rights: a Discussion of the Advantages and Disadvantages of According Fundamental Status to Parental Rights and Duties “ in J. EEKELAAR and P. SARCEVIC (eds.), Parenthood in Modern Society: Social and Legal Issues for the Twenty-First Century, Martinus Nijhoff, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eekelaar (J), 1986, “ The Emergence of Children’s Rights “, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies,6, pp. 162–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eekelaar (J), 1991, “ Parental Responsability: State of Nature or Nature of the State ? “, Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law,pp. 37–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eekelaar (J), 1992, “ The Importance of thinking that Children have Rights “, International Journal of Law and the Family,6, pp. 221–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eekelaar (J), 1994a, “ Families and Children: from Welfarism to Rights “ in McCRUDDEN C. and CHAMBERS G. (eds), Individual Rights and the Law in Britain, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eekelaar (J), 1994b, “ The Interests of the Child and Children’s Wishes: the Role of Dynamic Self-Determinism “, International Journal of Law and the Family,8, pp. 42–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Eekelaar (J), 1994c, “ The “Chief Glory “: The Export of Children from the United-Kingdom “, Journal of Law and Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank (R), 1990, “ Family Law and the Federal Republic of Germany’s Basic Law “, International Journal of Law and the Family,4, pp. 214–237

    Google Scholar 

  • Mclean (M) and Eekelaar (J), 1993, “ Child Support the British Solution “, International Journal of Law and the Family,7, pp. 205–229

    Google Scholar 

  • Mount.(F), 1982, The Subversive Family: an Alternative History of Love and Marriage, Jonathan Cape, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollock (F) and Maitland (F), 1968, The History of English Law, vol.2, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollock (L), 1983, Forgotten Children: Parent-Child Relations from 1500 to 1900, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rollet (C), 1990, La politique à l’égard de la petite enfance sous la Illème République, Presse Universitaires de France-INED, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubellin-Devichi (J), 1994, “ The Best Interests Principle in French Law and Practice “, International Journal of Law and the Family,8, pp. 258–279

    Google Scholar 

  • Rwezaura (B), 1994, “ The Concept of the Child Best Interests in the Changing Economic and Social Context of Sub-Saharan Africa “, International Journal of Law and the Family,8, pp. 82–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Seymour (J), 1994, “ Parens Patriae and Wardship Powers: their Nature and Origins “, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies,n°14, pp. 159–187

    Google Scholar 

  • Shorter (E), 1976, The Making of the Modern Family, William Collins, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone (L), 1977, The Family, Sex and Marriage in England 1500–1800, Weidenfeld & Nicholson, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waugh (N), 1911, These My Little Ones: the Origin, Progress and Development of the Incorporated Society of the Crusade of Rescue Homes for Destitute Catholic Children, Sands & Co, London.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Eekelaar, J. (1997). From “Privacy” to the Leviathan State The case of the child. In: Commaille, J., de Singly, F. (eds) The European Family. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8857-7_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8857-7_15

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4917-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-8857-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics