Skip to main content

Common Sense Obligation

  • Chapter
Defeasible Deontic Logic

Part of the book series: Synthese Library ((SYLI,volume 263))

Abstract

To attack the sophists’ conception of weakness of will, Aristotle cites Sophocles’ (Aristotle, 335B.C., Philoctetes VII, 2, 1146a19). Philoctetes had wandered into a forbidden garden, through no fault of his own, and had been punished by the gods with a disfiguring disease. Banishing him to a remote island, they had taken everything from him but his bow. As the play opens, the gods reveal to Odysseus that only that bow can win the Trojan War. So, Odysseus orders Neoptolemus to trick Philoctetes out of his bow.

This paper was presented at the 1993 meeting of the Society for Exact Philosophy at York University. We would like to thank Marvin Belzer, Robert Koons, Barry Loewer, Paul McNamara, Michael Morreau, Donald Nute, and the rest of the audience for their helpful criticisms and remarks. We owe added and special thanks to Michael Morreau, who has taught us much in discussions over the past several years, and to several anonymous referees.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aristotle (1962) Nicomachean Ethics, Translated by Martin Ostwald, New York: Macmillian Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asher N., and Morreau, M. (1991). Common sense entailment: A modal theory of nonmonotonic reasoning, Proceedings of the 12th IJCAI. San Mateo, Morgan Kaufmann, 387–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asher N., and Morreau, M. (1995) What some generic sentences mean, In J. Pelletier (ed.), The Generic Book. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pages 300–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonevac, D. (1991). Ethical impressionism: A response to Braybrooke. Social Theory and Practice 17: 157–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonevac, D., and Seung, T.K. (1988). Conflict in Practical Reasoning. Philosophical Studies 53: 315–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castaneda, H.N. (1985). Aspectual Actions and Davidson’s Theory of Events. In LePore, E., and McLaughlin, B.P. (eds.), Aspects and Events, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castafieda, H.N. (1986). Obligations, aspectual actions, and circumstances. Philosophical Papers 15: 155–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chisholm, R. (1963). Contrary-to-duty imperatives and deontic logic. Analysis 24: 33–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chisholm, R. (1964). The Ethics of requirement. American Philosophical Quarterly 1: 147–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conee, E. (1982). Against moral dilemmas. Philosophical Review 91: 87–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, M.L. (1982). The future of affermative action: A jurisprudential/legal critique. Harvard Civil Rights - Civil Liberties Law Review 17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foot, R (1983). Moral realism and moral dilemmas. Journal of Philosophy 80: 379–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forrester, J. (1984). Gentle murder, or the adverbial samaritan. The Journal of Philosophy 81: 193–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frankena, W. (1973). Ethics. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goble, L. (1990). A logic of good, should and would, part I. Journal of Philosophical Logic 19: 169–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goble, L. (1990). A logic of good, should and would, part II. Journal of Philosophical Logic 19: 253–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goble, L. (1990). Murder most gentile: The paradox deepens. Philosophical Studies 64: 217–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenspan, R (1975). Conditional ought and hypothetical imperatives. The Journal of Philosophy 72: 259–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horty, J. (1994). Moral dilemmas and nonmonotonic logic. Journal of Philosophical Logic 23:35–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horty, J. (1993). Deontic logic as founded on nonmonotonic logic. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence 9: 69–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, A. J. I. (1991). On the Logic of Deontic Conditionals. Ratio Juris 4: 355–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (1785). Foundations of the Metaphysics of Morals. Translated by Lewis White Beck, Bobbs-Merrill, Indianaplolis, (1959).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D. (1973). Counterfactuals. Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D. (1974). Semantical analysis for dyadic deontic logic. In Stenlund, S. (ed.), Logical Theory and Semantic Analysis. K. Reidel, Dordrecht, pages 1–14.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Loewer, B., and Belzer, M. (1983). Dyadic deontic detachment. Synthese 54: 295–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loewer, B., and Belzer, M. (1986). Help for the good samaritan paradox. Philosophical Studies 50: 117–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, R. B. (1966). Iterated deontic modalities. Mind 75: 580–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, R. B. (1980). Moral dilemmas and consistency. Journal of Philosophy 77: 121–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mill, J. S. (1861). Utilitarianism. Hackett Publishing Company, Indianapolis, (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  • Morreau, M. (1992). Conditionals in Philosophy and Artificial Intelligence. PhD dissertation, University of Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, T. (1979). The frangmentation of value. In Mortal Questions. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nickle, J. (1975). Preferential policies in hiring and admissions: A jurisprudential approach. Columbia Law Review 75: 534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pietroski, P. (1993). Prima facie obligations, ceteris paribus laws in moral theory. Ethics 103: 489–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pope, A. (1733). An essay on man. The Norton Anthology of Poetry, W. W. Norton & Co., New York, (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiter, R. (1980). A logic for default reasoning. Artificial Intelligence 13: 81–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryle, G. (1931). Systematically misleading expressions. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 32: 139–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, W. D. (1930). The Right and the Good. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinnott-Armstrong, W. (1985). A solution to forrester’s paradox of gentle murder. Journal of Philosophy 82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, P. (1973). Reverse discriminiation and compensatory justice. Analysis 33: 177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomason, F. (1981). Deontic logic as founded on tense logic. In Hilpinen, R. (ed.), New Studies in Deontic Logic. D. Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomason, E (1981). Deontic logic and the role of freedom in moral deliberation. In Hilpinen, R. (ed.), New Studies in Deontic Logic. D. Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Frassen, B. C. (1972). The logic of conditional obligation. The Journal of Philosophical Logic 1: 417–438.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Frassen, B. C. (1973). Values and the heart’s command. Jorunal of Philosophy 70: 5–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Wright, G. H. (1951). Deontic logic. Mind 60: 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, B. (1973). Ethical consistency. In Problems of the Self, Cambridge University Press, New York, 199–186.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Asher, N., Bonevac, D. (1997). Common Sense Obligation. In: Nute, D. (eds) Defeasible Deontic Logic. Synthese Library, vol 263. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8851-5_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8851-5_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4874-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-8851-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics