Abstract
It is widely believed, at least it is often said, that it is morally wrong to subject any human being to medical research without his or her free informed consent. Precisely why this is, or even might be, wrong remains something of a mystery because most of the rapidly growing literature dealing with consent in medical ethics is more concerned with the application of this requirement to problematic cases than with its theoretical justification. As long as the general principle that consent to medical research is morally necessary remains virtually unquestioned, it may be imagined that any inquiry into its justification would be an idle exercise in theoretical speculation. I suggest, on the contrary, that we would have a much better understanding of when and how the principle of consent applies in practice if we had a better grasp of the reasons that lie behind that principle in the first place.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1997 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wellman, C. (1997). Consent to Medical Research on Children. In: An Approach to Rights. Law and Philosophy Library, vol 29. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8812-6_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8812-6_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4814-1
Online ISBN: 978-94-015-8812-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive