Toward a Mathematical Modeling of Creativity
“Creativity” is fascinating! We know so much about the topic without having the slightest idea what it is. We even know how to promote creative behavior by encouraging subjects to avoid strict adherence to rules, to explore new explanations or paradigms, to welcome novelty, to transform a problem into a different framework, to generalize through abstraction, to brainstorm, and to explore options before making evaluations. But, other than knowing that these approaches tend to work (sufficiently well so that some are “corporate brainstorming strategies” while others are tried in the classroom), we really don’t know why. The “why” becomes an important issue. Also, all these different approaches emphasize “generality” over details. What explains this commonality?
KeywordsWorld View Input Node Adaptation Conflict Final Interpretation Necker Cube
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Arieti, S., Creativity: The Magic synthesis, Basic Books (New York), 1976.Google Scholar
- Boden, M., “What is Creativity?”, in Dimensions of Creativity,(Boden, M.), MIT Press, 1994, PP. 75–118.Google Scholar
- Erickson, E., Toys and Reason, Norton (New York), 1977.Google Scholar
- Galton, F., English men of science, their nature and nurture, Macmillan (London), 1874.Google Scholar
- Hadamard, J., The Psychology of Invention in the Mathematical Field, Princeton University Press, 1945.Google Scholar
- Kragh, U. and Smith G., Percept-Genetic Analysis, Gleerup ( Lund, Sweden ), 1970.Google Scholar
- Smith, G.J.W. and I.M. Carlsson, The Creative Process, International Universities Press, Inc. ( Madison, Connecticut ), 1990.Google Scholar
- Littlewood, J., Some Problems in Real and Complex Analysis, Heath ( Lexington, Mass ), 1968.Google Scholar
- Poincaré, H., “Mathematical creation”, The creative process, (ed. Chiselm, B. ), University of Calif. Press (Berkeley), 1952.Google Scholar
- Saari, D.G., “Cognitive development and the dynamics of adaptation”, Northwestern University preprint, 1978.Google Scholar
- Szekely, L., Denkverlauf Einsamkeit und Angst, Huber ( Bern, Switzerland ), 1976.Google Scholar