Advertisement

The World, The Mind and Mathematics

  • John L. Casti
Chapter
Part of the Synthese Library book series (SYLI, volume 258)

Abstract

Mathematics is a field full of dichotomies: continuous versus discrete, size versus shape, finite versus infinite and static versus dynamic to name just a few. But certainly the most controversial division is the notorious “pure” versus “applied”. And in a provocative 1981 article [1] titled “Applied Mathematics is Bad Mathematics”, Paul Halmos set the fox in among the chickens by claiming that usually the answer is Yes!, and that the reason ultimately comes down to a question of taste. To use one of Halmos’s analogies, a Picasso portrait is usually regarded as better art than a police photograph of a wanted criminal But the Picasso is probably not a very good likeness, while the police photo is far from inspiring to look at. So is it completely unfair to say that the portrait is a bad copy of nature and the photograph is bad art?

Keywords

Game Theory Price Vector Minimax Theorem Equilibrium Economic Vertex Point 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Halmos, P., “Applied Mathematics is Bad Mathematics”, in L. Steen, ed., Mathematics Tomorrow. New York: Springer, 1981, pp. 9–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    Von Neumann, J., “The Mathematician”, in R. Heywood, ed., The Works of the Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1947, pp. 180–196.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Gardner, H., “Seven Creators of the Modern Era”, in J. Brockman, ed., Creativity. New York: Touchstone Books, 1993, pp. 28–47.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Cskiszentmihalyi, M., “Society, Culture, and Person: A Systems View of Creativity”, in R. Sternberg, ed., The Nature of Creativity. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1988, PP. 325–339.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Poincaré, H., “Mathematical Discovery”, chapter 3, in Poincaré, H., Science and Method. Paris, 1908 ( Dover reprint, n.d.g.).Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Hardy, G.H., A Mathematician’s Apology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1940.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Halmos, P., “Mathematics as a Creative Art”. American Scientist, 56, 1968, 375–389.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Arrow, K., “Social Choice and Justice”, Collected Papers,vol. 2, Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1984, p. vii.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Debreu, G., Theory of Value. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1959.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Macrae, N., John von Neumann. New York: Pantheon, 1992, p. 51, 73.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    Ulam, S., Adventures of a Mathematician. New York: Scribners, 1976, p. 78.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    Ingrao, B. and Israel, G., The Invisible Hand. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1990.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    Von Neumann, J. and Morgenstern, O., Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1944.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • John L. Casti
    • 1
  1. 1.Santa Fe InstituteUSA

Personalised recommendations