Abstract
Although debates surrounding the interpretation of quantum theory are generally thought to have some bearing on the question of realism, the exact nature of the connection has remained controversial. Thus it is common to find the anti-realist arguing that the success of quantum theory has dealt the death blow to realism, while simultaneously some realists herald the quantum revolution as demanding a reconstruction of the conceptual framework of physics in order to attain a fuller understanding of nature’s structure. At the center of this debate on physical reality and the quantum description of nature is the monumental encounter between Bohr and Einstein, certainly by any standard one of the most significant intellectual confrontations in the history of science. Yet the precise relation of this particular debate to the philosopher’s discussion of realism remains not surprisingly as obscure and ill-understood as the relationship between quantum theory and realism generally.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Bibliography
Bohr, Niels (1935). ‘Can Quantum Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete?’, Physical Review 38, pp. 696–702.
Bohr, Niels (1949). ‘Discussion with Einstein on Epistemological Problems in Atomic Physics’, in P. A. Schilpp (ed.), Albert Einstein: Philosopher-Scientist, Open Court, LaSalle, Illinois, pp. 199–241.
Bohr, Niels (1958). Atomic Physics and Human Knowledge, J. Wiley, New York.
Cushing, James T. and McMullin, Ernan (eds.) (1989). Philosophical Consequences ofQuantum Theory, University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame.
Fine, Arthur (1986). The Shaky Game: Einstein, Realism and the Quantum Theory, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Folse, Henry (1985). The Philosophy of Niels Bohr: The Framework of Complementarity, North Holland Physics Publishing, Amsterdam.
Folse, Henry (1986a). ‘Niels Bohr, Complementarity, and Realism’, in A. Fine and P. Machamer (eds.), PSA 1986: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophyof Science Association, Vol. I, Philosophy of Science Association, East Lansing, Michigan, pp. 96–104.
Folse, Henry (1986b). ‘Complementarity and Scientific Realism’, in P. Weingartner and G. Dorn (eds.), Foundations of Physics, Holder-Pichler-Tempsky, Vienna, pp. 93–101.
Folse, Henry (1987). ‘Realism and the Quantum Revolution’, in Abstracts of the 8 th International Congress of Logic, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science, Vol. 4, Part I, Institute of Philosophy of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR, Moscow, pp. 199–200.
Folse, Henry (1988). ‘Niels Bohr’s Concept of Reality’, in P. J. Lahti and P. Mittelstaedt (eds.), Proceedings of the Symposium on the Foundations of Modern Physics: TheCopenhagen Interpretation 60 Years After the Como Lecture - Joensuu, Finland, August 6–8, 1987, World Scientific Publishing, Singapore, pp. 161–179.
Folse, Henry (1989a). ‘Bohr on Bell’, in Cushing and McMullin (eds.) (1989), pp. 254–271.
Folse, Henry (1989b). ‘Complementarity and Space-Time Description’, in Menas Kafatos (ed.), Bell’s Theorem, Quantum Theory and Conceptions of the Universe, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 251–259.
Folse, Henry (1990). ‘Laudan’s Model of Axiological Change and the Bohr-Einstein
Debate’, in Fine, A. et al. (eds.), PSA 90, Vol. 1, The Philosophy of Science Association, East Lansing, pp. 77–88.
Folse, Henry (1992). ‘Complementarity and our Knowledge of Nature’, in M. Carvallo (ed.), Nature, Cognition, and System, Vol. 2, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 51–66.
Gingerich, Owen (ed.) (1975). The Nature of Scientific Discovery, Smithsonian Institution
Press, Washington, D.C.
Heisenberg, Werner (1949). ‘Quantum Theory and Its Interpretation’, in S. Rozental (ed.), Niels Bohr: His Life and Work as Seen by his Friends and Colleagues, North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 94–108.
Heisenberg, Werner (1963). Interview with Thomas Kuhn, Munich, 25 February, 1963, in Archive for the History of Quantum Physics, Tape 52a.
Howard, Don (1985). ‘Einstein on Locality and Separability’, Studies in History andPhilosophy of Science16, 171–201.
Laudan, Larry (1984). Science and Values, University of California Press, Berkeley.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1996 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Folse, H.J. (1996). The Bohr-Einstein Debate and the Philosophers’ Debate over Realism versus Anti-Realism. In: Cohen, R.S., Hilpinen, R., Renzong, Q. (eds) Realism and Anti-Realism in the Philosophy of Science. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 169. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8638-2_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8638-2_20
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4493-8
Online ISBN: 978-94-015-8638-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive