Skip to main content

The Bohr-Einstein Debate and the Philosophers’ Debate over Realism versus Anti-Realism

  • Chapter
Realism and Anti-Realism in the Philosophy of Science

Part of the book series: Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science ((BSPS,volume 169))

Abstract

Although debates surrounding the interpretation of quantum theory are generally thought to have some bearing on the question of realism, the exact nature of the connection has remained controversial. Thus it is common to find the anti-realist arguing that the success of quantum theory has dealt the death blow to realism, while simultaneously some realists herald the quantum revolution as demanding a reconstruction of the conceptual framework of physics in order to attain a fuller understanding of nature’s structure. At the center of this debate on physical reality and the quantum description of nature is the monumental encounter between Bohr and Einstein, certainly by any standard one of the most significant intellectual confrontations in the history of science. Yet the precise relation of this particular debate to the philosopher’s discussion of realism remains not surprisingly as obscure and ill-understood as the relationship between quantum theory and realism generally.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Bohr, Niels (1935). ‘Can Quantum Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete?’, Physical Review 38, pp. 696–702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bohr, Niels (1949). ‘Discussion with Einstein on Epistemological Problems in Atomic Physics’, in P. A. Schilpp (ed.), Albert Einstein: Philosopher-Scientist, Open Court, LaSalle, Illinois, pp. 199–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohr, Niels (1958). Atomic Physics and Human Knowledge, J. Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cushing, James T. and McMullin, Ernan (eds.) (1989). Philosophical Consequences ofQuantum Theory, University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fine, Arthur (1986). The Shaky Game: Einstein, Realism and the Quantum Theory, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folse, Henry (1985). The Philosophy of Niels Bohr: The Framework of Complementarity, North Holland Physics Publishing, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folse, Henry (1986a). ‘Niels Bohr, Complementarity, and Realism’, in A. Fine and P. Machamer (eds.), PSA 1986: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophyof Science Association, Vol. I, Philosophy of Science Association, East Lansing, Michigan, pp. 96–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folse, Henry (1986b). ‘Complementarity and Scientific Realism’, in P. Weingartner and G. Dorn (eds.), Foundations of Physics, Holder-Pichler-Tempsky, Vienna, pp. 93–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folse, Henry (1987). ‘Realism and the Quantum Revolution’, in Abstracts of the 8 th International Congress of Logic, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science, Vol. 4, Part I, Institute of Philosophy of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR, Moscow, pp. 199–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folse, Henry (1988). ‘Niels Bohr’s Concept of Reality’, in P. J. Lahti and P. Mittelstaedt (eds.), Proceedings of the Symposium on the Foundations of Modern Physics: TheCopenhagen Interpretation 60 Years After the Como Lecture - Joensuu, Finland, August 6–8, 1987, World Scientific Publishing, Singapore, pp. 161–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folse, Henry (1989a). ‘Bohr on Bell’, in Cushing and McMullin (eds.) (1989), pp. 254–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folse, Henry (1989b). ‘Complementarity and Space-Time Description’, in Menas Kafatos (ed.), Bell’s Theorem, Quantum Theory and Conceptions of the Universe, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 251–259.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Folse, Henry (1990). ‘Laudan’s Model of Axiological Change and the Bohr-Einstein

    Google Scholar 

  • Debate’, in Fine, A. et al. (eds.), PSA 90, Vol. 1, The Philosophy of Science Association, East Lansing, pp. 77–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folse, Henry (1992). ‘Complementarity and our Knowledge of Nature’, in M. Carvallo (ed.), Nature, Cognition, and System, Vol. 2, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 51–66.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gingerich, Owen (ed.) (1975). The Nature of Scientific Discovery, Smithsonian Institution

    Google Scholar 

  • Press, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heisenberg, Werner (1949). ‘Quantum Theory and Its Interpretation’, in S. Rozental (ed.), Niels Bohr: His Life and Work as Seen by his Friends and Colleagues, North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 94–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heisenberg, Werner (1963). Interview with Thomas Kuhn, Munich, 25 February, 1963, in Archive for the History of Quantum Physics, Tape 52a.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, Don (1985). ‘Einstein on Locality and Separability’, Studies in History andPhilosophy of Science16, 171–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laudan, Larry (1984). Science and Values, University of California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1996 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Folse, H.J. (1996). The Bohr-Einstein Debate and the Philosophers’ Debate over Realism versus Anti-Realism. In: Cohen, R.S., Hilpinen, R., Renzong, Q. (eds) Realism and Anti-Realism in the Philosophy of Science. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 169. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8638-2_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8638-2_20

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4493-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-8638-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics