Advertisement

New York’s Do-Not-Resuscitate Law: Bad Law, Bad Medicine, and Bad Ethics

  • George Annas
Part of the Philosophy and Medicine book series (PHME, volume 48)

Abstract

I can begin by telling you that I disagree with almost nothing Commissioner Axelrod states about his goals. He is absolutely correct about the need for more communication and the need for informed consent. Physicians do not have the final answers to what patients want; we must do more to treat patients properly. I am glad that I agree with Dr. Axelrod on these points because I have always admired him. I have stated publicly a number of times that he is the most effective and innovative commissioner of health in the United States.

Keywords

Brain Death Medical Procedure Legal Liability Presume Consent Medical Futility 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Annas, G.J.: 1988, Judging Medicine, Humana Press, Clifton, New Jersey.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Annas, G.J.: 1989, The Right of Patients, Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale, Illinois.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Annas, G.J.: 1990, ‘Nancy Cruzan and the Right to Die’, New England Journal of Medicine 323, 670–673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Annas, G.J.: 1991, ‘The Health Care Proxy and the Living Will’, New England Journal of Medicine 324, 1210–1213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bedell, S. and Delbanco, T.: 1984, ‘Choices About Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in the Hospital: When Do Physicians talk With Patients?’, New England Journal of Medicine 310, 1089–1093.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • George Annas

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations