Advertisement

A Review of the Empirical Studies of the DNR Law and a Rejoinder to Tracy Miller

  • Robert Baker
Part of the Philosophy and Medicine book series (PHME, volume 48)

Abstract

Tracy E. Miller, Executive Director of the New York State Task Force on Life and the Law, charges that “studies of actual [clinical] practice presented in this volume… show that [the Union College Study] rest[s] on false factual assumptions” [12, p. 325]. These charges, and those she levels against the implications we draw from similar findings made independently by Dr. Norton Spritz [18], are serious, but they arise from fundamental misunderstandings about the nature of clinical phenomena and of the findings of the five empirical studies of the DNR law. In this chapter I will show that Miller’s readings of the empirical studies are incorrect, that her charges are therefore unfounded, and that her misreading of the empirical studies obscures the extent to which the DNR law successfully empowered patients.

Keywords

Critical Care Unit Critical Care Physician Surrogate Consent Adult Critical Care Unit Genesee Hospital 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Ahronheim, J., Maheswaran, S. Rosenberg, C.: 1992, ‘Impact of Do-Not Resuscitate Legislation on the use of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in Three Teaching Hospitals,’ New York State Journal of Medicine 92, 181–185.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ahronheim, J., Maheswaran, S. Rosenberg, C.: 1995, ‘Does the New York State DNR Law Prevent Medically Inappropriate DNR?’, this volume, pp. 235–240.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Baker, R., Strosberg, M., 1995, ‘Introduction’, this volume, pp. xiii–xvi.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Baker, R., Dersch, V., Fein I. A. et al.: 1989, ‘Physicians’ Attitudes Towards Using Deception’, Journal of the American Medical Association 266, 22–33.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Baker, R., Strosberg, M., Schmee, J. et al.: 1995, ‘The 1988 DNR Reforms: A comparative study of the New York DNR Law and the JCAHO accreditation requirements for DNR policy’, this volume, pp. 263–301 (Also referred to as The Union College Study).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dersch, V.: 1995, ‘Differences in Clinician Reactions to the New York State DNR Law’, this volume, pp. 303–321.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hastings Center: 1987, Guidelines on the Termination of Life-Sustaining Treatment and the Care of the Dying, Indiana University Press, Bloomington, Indiana.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kamer, R., Dieck, E., McClung, J., White, P.: 1990, ‘Effect of New York State’s DoNot-Resuscitate Legislation on In-Hospital Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Practice’, American Journal of Medicine 88, 108–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kamer, R., McClung, J.: 1995, ‘New York’s Do-Not-Resuscitate Law: Benefit or burden’, this volume, pp. 227–234.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Medical Society of the State of New York: 1982, Guidelines for Hospitals and Physicians on ‘Do Not Resuscitate’, Lake Success, New York; reprinted, this volume, pp. 369–370.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Miller, T.: 1995, ‘Taking Stock of Do-Not-Resuscitate Orders: Perception and Practice’, this volume, pp. 105–132.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Miller, T.: 1995, ‘An Assessment of the Union College Study and a Response to Robert Baker’s Analysis of the DNR Law’, this volume, pp. 325–332.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    New York State Task Force on Life and the Law: 1986, Do Not Resuscitate Orders: The Proposed Legislation and Report of the New York State Task Force on Life and the Law, Second Edition, New York, N.Y., this volume, pp. 381–413.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    President’s Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research: 1983, Deciding to Forego Life-Sustaining Treatment: A Report on the Ethical, Medical, and Legal Issues in Treatment Decisions, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. Excerpts in this volume, pp. 371–379.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Quill, T., Bennett, N.: 1992, ‘The Effects of A Hospital Policy and State Legislation on Resuscitation Orders for Geriatric Patients’, Archives of Internal Medicine 152, 569–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Quill, T., Bennett, N.: 1995, ‘The Effects of A Hospital Policy and State Legislation on Resuscitation Orders for Geriatric Patients’, this volume, pp. 241–250.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rest, J.: 1979, Moral Development: Advances in Research and Theory, Praeger Publishers, New York, N.Y.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Spritz, N.: 1995, ‘The New York State DNR Law: Views of the members of the New York Chapter of the American College of Physicians’, this volume, pp. 251–261.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zussman, R.: 1995, ‘The Do-Not-Resuscitate Order as Ritual’, this volume, pp. 215–225.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert Baker

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations