Skip to main content

Association Theory of Meaning: A Reconstruction of the Literature

  • Chapter
Book cover Emotion in Aesthetics

Part of the book series: Philosophical Studies Series ((PSSP,volume 64))

  • 195 Accesses

Abstract

The dispute continues as to whether or not art has meaning. Sparshott (1994: 23) says of Malcolm Budd’s, Music and the Emotions (1985), Budd’s book…ended by giving the impression that we lacked any theory of the relation between music and the emotions. On the relation between music and emotions Sparshott wrote, We do not know what such a theory should be and have no reason to seek such knowledge (23). In what sense can we say that a painting or sonata has meaning? Claims are made. Some expressionists and others held that art expresses meaning and others, such as Hanslick, Scruton and the formalists claim that it has no meaning at all. The issue is clear. Either there are no meanings or there are. But the arguments are unclear. There seems to be little advance being made on understanding how to resolve the issue.

There is virtually unanimous agreement that C major is a cheerful key.

Young 1991: 240

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Wittgenstein 1958: #308. cf. #96, 123, 211.

    Google Scholar 

  2. cf. Tesconi 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Shibles 1985: 57–73, 185–210.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Shibles 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Shibles 1971ab, 1973ab, 1974b.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Stravinsky, in Cooke 1959: 11.

    Google Scholar 

  7. cf. Budd 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  8. cf. Patai & Koertge 1994: 149–152.

    Google Scholar 

  9. cf. Beard & Cerf 1995: 12.

    Google Scholar 

  10. cf. “Metaphor as association.” Shibles 1971a: 373, 1971b, 1995a.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hoaglund 1980: 347.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kivy 1980: 28 ff., 57, 77.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Palisca 1980: 173.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Price 1988: 215; Levinson 1982: 338.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Koestler 1949: ch. 23.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ernst Cassirer 1945, 1953–1957.

    Google Scholar 

  17. cf. Shibles 1971a: 70, 165.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Shibles 1971b.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Dewey 1958: 78, 84.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Shibles, W. (1995). Association Theory of Meaning: A Reconstruction of the Literature. In: Emotion in Aesthetics. Philosophical Studies Series, vol 64. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8579-8_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8579-8_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4593-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-8579-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics