Abstract
In any instance of justification there is a conditioned, X, whose conditions are said to be fulfilled. Thus: X, if the set of conditions, C. And C. Therefore, X. This justificatory structure holds in every domain.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bankowski, Zenon, 1995. ‘Analogical Reasoning and Legal Institutions’, in this collection.
Barden, Garrett, 1976. ‘Discriminating Classes’, MAN, Vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 345–355, London.
Hobbes, T., [1651] 1957. Leviathan, (ch. xiv), Ed. M. Oakeshott, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.
Hume, D., [1777] 1974. Enquiry concerning Human Understanding, (Section IV, part 2). Hume’s Two Enquiries, ed. L.A. Selby-Bigge, 3rd edn ed. P.H. Nidditch, Oxford.
Meehan, James, 1991. ‘Research, Joint-Ventures, and Anti-Trust Policy,’ Sloan Foundation Science-Technology Colloquium, Colby College, 15 March 1991.
Tarski, A., [1944] 1949. ‘The Semantic Conception of Truth and the Foundations of Semantics’. Trans. pp. 52–84 in: P. Feigl and W. Sellars (eds.), Readings in Philosophical Analysis, New York.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1995 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Barden, G. (1995). Formalization, Invention, Justification. In: Bankowski, Z., White, I., Hahn, U. (eds) Informatics and the Foundations of Legal Reasoning. Law and Philosophy Library, vol 21. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8531-6_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8531-6_10
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4542-3
Online ISBN: 978-94-015-8531-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive