Abstract
An information system named GEO and its related instrumental environment are described. The technology implemented in GEO integrates the geographic information technology with case-based and knowledge-based system technologies. An example of a GIS application to seismic hazard assessment for the region which is formed by the Lesser Caucasus and by the Eastern part of the Great Caucasus is discussed.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Anderson J.G., 1979. Estimating the seismicity from geological structure for seismic risk studies. Bull. Seism. Soc. of America, v. 69(1), 135–158.
Bune V.I., and Gorshkov G.P.,(Editors), 1980. USSR Seismic Zonation. Nayka, Moscow, 307 pp. (in Russian).
Bune V.I., Gitis V.G., Kalenik V.N., Mironov M.A., and Shchukin Yu.K., 1980. A Method of Elaboration of Maps for the Prediction of Maximum Magnitudes of Earthquakes. Acta Geophysica Polonica, v. 28(4), 273–283.
Burton P.W., 1979. Seismic risk in Southern Europe through to India examined using Gumbels third distribution of extreme values. Geophysical Jour. Roy. Astron. Soc, v. 59, 249–280.
Gitis V.G., Mironov M.A., Bune V.I., and Vuchev V.T., 1982. M max Earthquake Map Elaboration by the Method of Interval Expert Evaluations. Physics of the Earth., v. 4, 31–44.
Gitis V.G., Mironov M.A., Bune V.I., Kalenik V.N., and Shchukin Yu.K., 1986. M max Earthquake Prediction on the Basis of Approximation of the Interval Expert Evaluations. Physics of the Earth, v. 4, 24–31.
Gitis V.G., Jurkov E.F., and Osher B.V., 1991. GEO — an Expert System for Geological and Geophysical Prognosis. In: Proc. 4th International Conference on Seismic Zonation, Stanford, v. 3, 59–64.
Gitis V.G., Ermakov B.V., Ivanovsnaia L.V., Osher B.V., Trofimov D.P., Schenk V., Shchukin Ju.K., and Jurkov E.F., 1993. The Information Technology of the GEO system for Prediction M max of Earthquake. Journal of Earthquake Prediction Research, v. 2(2), 221–228.
Gvishiani A.D., Gidkov M.P., and Soloviev A.A., 1982. Recognition of the places of expected strong earthquakes. In: Earth Mathematical Models and Earthquake Prediction, Moscow, Nauka, 56-68, (in Russian).
Kopp M.L., 1982. Some Questions of the Late Alpine Geodynamics of the south-east Caucasus, Talysh and Kura lowland. The Problems of the Caucasus Geodynamics. Moscow, Nauka, (in Russian).
Philip H., Cisternas A., Gvishiani F., and Gorshkov A., 1989. The Caucasus — an Actual Example of the Initial Stages of Continental Collision. Tectonophysics, v. 161, 1–21.
Schenk V., Gitis V.G., Schenkova Z., Mantlik F., Kotnauer P., Jurkov E.F., and Shchukin Ju.K., 1991. Maximum Earthquake Prediction in Central Europe Given by the GEO 1.2 Expert System. In: Proc. 4th International Conference on Seismic Zonation, Stanford, v. 3, 83–91.
Sibson R.H., 1974. Frictional Constraints on Thrust, Wrench and Normal Faults. Nature, 1974, v. 249, 542–544.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1995 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gitis, V.G. (1995). GIS Technology for the Design of Computer-Based Models in Seismic Hazard Assessment. In: Carrara, A., Guzzetti, F. (eds) Geographical Information Systems in Assessing Natural Hazards. Advances in Natural and Technological Hazards Research, vol 5. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8404-3_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8404-3_11
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4561-4
Online ISBN: 978-94-015-8404-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive