Abstract
The contemporary relevance of Hegel’s Philosophy of Art is evident in recent discussions of his emphasis upon the historicity of art (cf. esp. [19, 28, 20, 4]). No other notion in that work has received such conflicting commentaries, or diverse evaluations of its capacity to illuminate the difficult situation of modern art, as the thesis ascribed to Hegel that art has come to its end (cf. most recently [8]). Yet there is no critical edition of the aesthetics lectures, and we must still refer to Hotho’s compilation, which, if admirably cohesive, is not unproblematic either philologically or in many details.2 Research has provided reliable information about the historical development both of the origin and first phases of Hegel’s philosophizing in general,3 and, more pertinently, of the genesis of his theoretical interpretations of art in particular, from the early discussions within the circle of his Tübingen friends up to the Berlin lectures of the 1820’s, which presuppose the complete system of the Encyclopedia [7] and are the basis of Hotho’s edition. These lectures have become an independent work because of the history of their effects. However, their exceedingly complicated theoretical form, which both corresponds to the “mature” Hegel’s conception of the Encyclopedia’s system and must be considered authentic in its internal structure, has never been adequately analyzed.4
I was young and proud, and I waxed in my arrogance when I learned from Hegel that it is not, as my grandmother had supposed, that the dear God resides in heaven, but rather that I myself here on earth am the dear God. (Heinrich Heine, Confessions, 1854)
I first presented several of the thoughts in this paper within the aegis of a seminar on “Conceptions of Philosophical Aesthetics”, which took place in Oberjoch under the direction of Klaus Hartmann. In the running text I use the following abbreviations to refer to Hegel’s works: A I, II, III = [18], vol. 13, 14, 15 (Vorlesungen über die Aesthetik); E = Enzyklopaedie der philosophischen Wissenschaften im Grundriss [17]; L I, II = Wissenschaft der Logik [15].
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Bibliography
Aschenberg, R.: 1976, Der Wahrheitsbegriff in Hegels “Phänomenologie des Geistes”, in K. Hartmann (ed.), Die ontologische Option, de Gruyter, Berlin/New York, pp. 211–308.
Aschenberg, R.: 1982, Sprachanalyse und Transzendentalphilosophie, Klett-Cotta, Stuttgart.
Bubner, R.: 1973, Über einige Bedingungen gegenwärtiger Aesthetik’, Neue Hefte für Philosophie 5, 38–73.
Bubner, R.: 1980, ‘Hegel’s Aesthetics — Yesterday and Today’, in W.E. Steinkraus and K.I. Schmitz (eds.), Art and Logic in Hegel’s Philosophy, Humanities Press, Sussex; Harvester Press, New Jersey, pp. 15–33.
Bungay, S.: 1984, Beauty and Truth. A Study of Hegel’s Aesthetics, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Fulda, H.F.: 1981, ‘Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel’ in O. Hoeffe (ed.), Klassiker der Philosophie II, Beck, München, pp. 62–92.
Gethmann-Siefert, A.: 1984, Die Funktion der Kunst in der Geschichte. Untersuchungen zu Hegels Aesthetik, Bouvier, Bonn.
Gethmann-Siefert, A.: 1984, Hegels These vom Ende der Kunst und der Klassizismus der Aesthetik’, Hegel-Studien 19, 205–258.
Gethmann-Siefert, A.: 1986, Die Rolle der Kunst im Staat. Kontroverses zwischen Hegel und den Hegelianern’, in A. Gethmann-Siefert and O. Poeggeler (eds.), Welt und Wirkung von Hegels Aesthetik, Bouvier, Bonn, pp. 65–102.
Gethmann-Siefert, A.: 1987, Kunst für schwache Kosmopoliten’, Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, 30.9, p. 36.
Habermas, J.: 1985, Der philosophische Diskurs der Moderne, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main.
Hartmann, K.: 1972, Hegel: A Non-Metaphysical View’, in A. Maclntyre (ed.), Hegel. A Collection of Critical Essays, Anchor Books, New York, pp. 101–124.
Hartmann, K.: 1976, Die ontologische Option’, in K. Hartmann (ed.), Die ontologische Option, de Gruyter, Berlin/New York, pp. 1–30.
Hartmann, K.: 1988, Studies in Foundational Philosophy, Rodopi, Amsterdam.
Hegel, G.W.F.: 1934, Wissenschaft der Logik Bde I, I I, G. Lasson (ed.), Meiner, Hamburg.
Hegel, G.W.F.: 1965, Aesthetik, F. Bassenge (ed.), Europäische Verlagsanstalt, Frankfurt am Main.
Hegel, G.W.F.: 1969, Enzyklopaedie der philosophischen Wissenschaften im Grundrisse (1830 ed.), F. Nicolin and O. Poeggeler (eds.), Meiner, Hamburg.
Hegel, G.W.F.: 1969, Werke in zwanzig Bände, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main.
Henrich, D.: 1966, Kunst und Kunstphilosophie der Gegenwart (Überlegungen mit Rücksicht auf Hegel)’, in W. Iser (ed.), Immanente Aesthetik Aesthetische Reflexion (Poetik und Hermeneutik II), Fink, München, pp. 11–32.
Henrich, D.: 1974, Zur Aktualität von Hegels Aesthetik’, in H.-G. Gadamer (ed.), Stuttgarter Hegel-Tage 1970, Bouvier, Bonn, pp. 295–301.
Henrich, D.: 1982, Selbstverhältnisse, Reclam, Stuttgart.
Hoesle, V.: 1987, Hegels System, Meiner, Hamburg.
Poeggeler, O.: 1986, System und Geschichte der Künste bei Hegel’, in A. Gethmann-Siefert and O. Poeggeler (eds.), Welt und Wirkung von Hegels Aesthetik, Bouvier, Bonn, pp. 1–26.
Puntel, L.B.: 1973, Darstellung, Methode und Struktur. Untersuchungen zur Einheit der systematischen Philosophie G.W.F. Hegels, Bouvier, Bonn.
Szondi, P.: 1974, Poetik und Geschichtsphilosophie I, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main.
Wagner, H.: 1959, Philosophie und Reflexion, Reinhardt, München/Basel.
Weisse, C.H.: 1838, in Hallische Jahrbücher für deutsche Wissenschaft und Kunst 1, pp. 1673–1676,1681–1720.
Wolandt, G.: 1967, Zur Aktualität der Hegelschen Aesthetik’, Hegel-Studien 4, 219–234.
Zander, H.: 1970, Hegels Kunstphilosophie. Eine Analyse ihrer Grundlagen und ihrer Aktualität, Henn, Ratingen.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1994 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Aschenberg, R. (1994). On the Theoretical Form of Hegel’s Aesthetics. In: Engelhardt, H.T., Pinkard, T. (eds) Hegel Reconsidered. Philosophical Studies in Contemporary Culture, vol 2. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8378-7_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8378-7_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4349-8
Online ISBN: 978-94-015-8378-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive