Abstract
Since 1974, date of publication of M. Ghiselin’s paper “A radical solution to the species problem”, a vigorous polemic has been raging among philosophers of biology on the question of whether biological taxa, and specially biospecies, are classes or individuals. Obviously they are neither, but the lack of adequate conceptual tools has tended to cloud the issue. D. Hull has convincingly shown that biospecies (entities which originate, evolve, and split or become extinct) are not classes, but has been less successful with his claim that species are individuals. Some philosophers, like A. Rosenberg and M. Williams, have accepted Hull’s position. Others, like P. Kitcher and A. Caplan, have remained unconvinced. Several biologists specially concerned with systematics have also accepted the claim that species are individuals, among them E. Mayr, N. Eldredge and R. Willmann. Many others are somehow bewildered by the use of the word individual (normally reserved for organisms) to refer to species.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Ghiselin, M.: 1974. “A radical solution to the species problem”. Systematic Zoology 23, p. 536–544.
Hull, D.: 1978. “A matter of individuality”. Philosophy of Science 45, p. 335–360.
Kitcher, P.: 1984. The nature of mathematical knowledge Oxford University Press. New York.
Kitcher, P.: 1987. “Ghostly whispers: Mayr, Ghiselin, and the ”Philosophers“ on the ontological status of species”. Biology und Philosophy 2, p. 184–192.
Leonard, H. und Goodman, N.: 1940. “The calculus of individuals and its uses”. Journal of symbolic logic 5, p. 45–55.
Lovelock, J.: 1979. Gaia. A new look at life on Earth. Penguin Books. London.
Mayr, E.: 1987. “The ontological status of species: Scientific progress and philosophical terminology”. Biology und Philosophy 2, p. 145166.
Mishler B. and Brandon R.: 1987. “Individuality, pluralism and the phylogenetic species concept”. Biology und Philosophy 2, p. 397–414.
Ridley, M.: 1989. “The cladistic solution to the species problem”. Biology und Philosophy 4, p. 1–16.
Simons, Peter: 1987. Parts. A Study in Ontology. Clarendon Press. Oxford.
Willmann, R.: 1985. Die Art in Raum and Zeit. Das Artkonzept in der Biologie and Paläontologie. Paul Parey. Hamburg.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1994 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mosterin, J. (1994). Mereology, Set Theory, Biological Ontology. In: Prawitz, D., Westerståhl, D. (eds) Logic and Philosophy of Science in Uppsala. Synthese Library, vol 236. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8311-4_33
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8311-4_33
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4365-8
Online ISBN: 978-94-015-8311-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive