Ontogeny of Language-Specific Syllabic Productions
Cross linguistic analyses of syllables in dissyllabic productions of infants from four different linguistic communities were used to test the role of the perceptual and selective factors in the early organisation of infants’ vocal productions. The differences in the V1V2 height relations and the favored co-ocurrences in CV associations closely reflect the language-specific characteristics exhibited by the dissyllabic words infants will utter some months later. These results support the Interaction Hypothesis which claims that early perceptual experience with language already shaped the phonetic and syllabic organization of 10–12 months old infants’ vocal productions.
KeywordsStop Consonant Linguistic Community Vocal Production Front Vowel Back Vowel
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Boysson-Bardies, B. de (1991) ‘Early selection of phonetic repertoire: Cross-linguistic differences’, Proceedings of the XIIth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Aix-en-Provence, August 19–24 1991, vol 1, 320–323.Google Scholar
- Boysson-Bardies, B. de and Vihman, M.M. (1991) ‘Adaptation to language: Evidence from babbling and first words in four languages’, Language 67, 297–319.Google Scholar
- Davis, B.L. and MacNeilage, P.F. (1990) ‘Acquisition of correct vowel production: a quantitative case study’, Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 33, 16–27.Google Scholar
- Greenough, W. T. and Black, J. E. (1992). Induction of brain structure by experience: Substrates for cognitive development. In M. Gunnar and C. Nelson (Eds.), The Minnesota Symposia on Child Psychology, 24: Developmental Behavioral Neuroscience, 155–200. Erlbaum: Hillsdale, N.J.Google Scholar
- Grieser, D. and Kuhl, P. (1989) ‘Categorization of speech by infants: Support for speech-sound prototypes’, Developmental Psychology 25(4): 577–588.Google Scholar
- Jusczyk, P. (this volume) Sometimes it pays to look back before you leap ahead.Google Scholar
- Kiparsky, P. and Menn, L. (1977) ‘On the acquisition of phonology’, in J. Macnamara (ed.), Language Learning and Thought, Academic Press, New York, pp. 47–78.Google Scholar
- Macken, M.A. and Ferguson, C.A. (1983) ‘Cognitive aspects of phonological development: Model, evidence and issues’, in K.E. Nelson (ed.), Children’s Language, 4, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 256–282.Google Scholar
- MacNeilage, P.F. and Davis, B.L. (1991) ‘Acquisition of speech production: Frames, then content’, in M. Jeannerod (ed.), Attention and Performance XIII: Motor representation and control, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 453–476.Google Scholar
- Menn, L. (1983) ‘Development of articulatory, phonetic, and phonological capabilities’, in B. Butterworth (ed.), Language Production, vol II: Development, writing and other processes, Academic Press, London-New York, pp. 1–43.Google Scholar
- Vihman, M.M. (1992) ‘Early syllables and the construction of phonology’, in CA. Ferguson, L. Menn and C Stoel-Gamon (eds.), Phonological Development: Models, Research, Implications, York Press, Timonium, MD, 393–422.Google Scholar