Advertisement

Shells of Sandwich Construction

  • Jack R. Vinson
Chapter
Part of the Solid Mechanics and Its Applications book series (SMIA, volume 18)

Abstract

Sandwich construction, like the name implies, usually consists of two faces which are kept separated by a core. The facings usually carry the in-plane primary loads (tensile, compressive, and in-plane shear), while the core (analogous to the web of an I-beam) resists the transverse shear loads. The two faces usually are composed of the same material, and have the same thickness (tf), which places the neutral surface of bending at the mid-plane of the sandwich cross-section, as shown in Figure 24.1 (a).

Keywords

Sandwich Panel Flexural Stiffness Foam Core Honeycomb Core Core Sandwich 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 24.1.
    Vinson, J. R., “Comparison of Optimized Sandwich Panels of Various Constructions Subjected to In-Plane Loads”, Sandwich Constructions I, Engineering Materials Advisory Services, Ltd., pp. 23–49, 1989.Google Scholar
  2. 24.2.
    Vinson, J. R., “Analysis and Optimization of Composite and Metallic Sandwich Cylindrical Shells”, Transactions of the Second International Conference on Sandwich Constructions“, Gainesville, March 9–12, 1992.Google Scholar
  3. 24.3.
    Anon., “Buckling of Thin Walled Circular Cylinders”, NASA SP-8007 Revised, August 1968.Google Scholar
  4. 24.4.
    Vinson, J.R., “Minimum Weight Solid Core Composite Sandwich Panels Subjected to In-Plane Shear Loads”, American Society for Composites/UD CCM Joint Symposium on Composite Materials Science and Engineering, September 23–25, 1987.Google Scholar
  5. 24.5.
    Heath, W. G., “Sandwich Construction, Pt. 1, The Strength of Flat Sandwich Panels”, Aircraft Engineering, Vol. 32, pp. 186–191, July, 1960.Google Scholar
  6. 24.6.
    Anon., “Materials, Properties and Design Criteria, Military Handbook 23, Part II, Sandwich Construction for Aircraft”, Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  7. 24.7.
    Technical Data Sheet, “Klegecell in Buoyancy”, Klegecell Division of Hutchinson Corporation, Grapevine, TX, USA.Google Scholar
  8. 24.8.
    Termanto Rigid PVC Foam for Insulation Buoyancy and Sandwich Core Construction“, Torin, Inc., Ridgewood, NJ, USA.Google Scholar
  9. 24.9.
    Vinson, J.R., “Minimum Weight Solid Core Composite Sandwich Panels Subjected to In-Plane Compressive Loads”, Transactions of the International Conference on Composite Materials and Structures, Madras, Jan. 6–9, 1988.Google Scholar
  10. 24.10.
    Vinson, J.R. and Handel, P. I., “Optimal Stacking Sequences of Composite Faces for Various Sandwich Panels and Loads to Attain Minimum Weight”, Transactions of the 29th Annual AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, Williamsburg, April 18–20, 1988.Google Scholar
  11. 24.11.
    Vinson, J.R. and R. L. Sierakowski, “The Behavior of Structures Composed of Composite Materials”, Martinus-Nijhoff Publishers (now Kluwer Academic Publishers), Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1986.Google Scholar
  12. 24.12.
    Bert, C. W., W. C. Crisman and G. M. Nordby, “Buckling of Cylindrical and Conical Sandwich Shells with Orthotropic Facings”, AIAA Journal, Vol. 7, No. 2, pp. 250–257, February, 1969.Google Scholar
  13. 24.13.
    Reese, C.D. and C. W. Bert, Simplified Design Equations for Buckling of Axially Compressed Sandwich Cylinders with Orthotropic Facings and Core, AIAA Journal of Aircraft, pp. 515–519, November-December 1969.Google Scholar
  14. 24.14.
    Kaechele, L. E., “Minimum Weight Design of Sandwich Panels”, USAF Project Rand Research Memorandum RM 1895, March 1957.Google Scholar
  15. 24.15.
    Norris, C.B., “Short-Column Compressive Strength of Sandwich Constructions as Affected by Size of Cells of Honeycomb Core Materials”, Forest Products Laboratory Report 026, January 1964.Google Scholar
  16. 24.16.
    Vinson, J.R., and S. Shore, “Methods of Structural Optimizations for Flat Sandwich Panels”, U.S. Naval Air Engineering Center Report NAEC-ASL1083, 15 April 1965.Google Scholar
  17. 24.17.
    Wilkins, D. J., C. W. Bert, and D. M. Egle, “Free Vibrations of Orthotropic Sandwich Conical Shells with Various Boundary Conditions”, J. Sound Vib., Vol. 13, No. 2, p. 211, 1970.ADSzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 24.18.
    Bert, C. W., Bacon, “Unsymmetric Free Vibration of Orthotropic Sandwich Shells of Revolution”, AIAA Journal, Vol. 5, No. 3, p. 413., 1962.Google Scholar
  19. 24.19.
    Bert, C. W., Ray, “Vibrations of Orthotropic Sandwich Conical Shells with Free Edges”, International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, Vol. 11, p. 767, 1970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 24.20.
    Siu, C. C., C. W. Bert, “Free Vibrational Analysis of Sandwich Conical Shells with Free Edges”, J. Acoust. Sci. Am., (1970), Vol. 47, No. 3, Part 2, p. 943.Google Scholar
  21. 24.21.
    Hsu, T. M., J. Wang, “Rotationally Symmetric Vibrations of Orthotropic Layered Cylindrical Shells”, J. Sound Vib., (1971), Vol. 16, No. 4, p. 473.ADSzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 24.22.
    Padovan, J., B. Koplik, “Vibrations of Closed and Open Sandwich Cylindrical Shells using Refined Theory”, J. Acoust. Sci. Am., Vol. 47, No. 3, Part 2, p. 862, 1970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 24.23.
    Allen, H. G., “Analysis and Design of Structural Sandwich Panels”, Pergamon Press, 1969.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jack R. Vinson
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical Engineering and the Center for Composite MaterialsUniversity of DelawareNewarkUSA

Personalised recommendations