Skip to main content

The New Ethos of Patient Autonomy

  • Chapter
Book cover Informed Consent

Part of the book series: Clinical Medical Ethics ((CMET,volume 4))

Abstract

Informed consent did not spring full-armored like Athena from the head of Zeus. As already noted, it has undergone a long development in Anglo-American law. Equally, though only in more recent years, the doctrine has been appropriated by a broad-based movement to reform medicine in ways felt to be more congruent with the general practices and aspirations of a free society. And it is to this social movement, this “new ethos of patient autonomy” (McCullough and Wear, 1985; Wear, 1991), that we must now refer in order to understand the agendas, insights and arguments behind the doctrine of informed consent.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Beecher, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  2. There are various sources of paternalism in medicine, some credible, some not. I am concerned here with the variety that bases its actions on an articulate vision of patients’ best interests and the threats to these interests in the situation of illness. Paternalism can also spring from a penchant for convenience and control, at times ego-gratification and arrogance, that proceeds by ignoring the needs and concerns of patients, as well as the value-charged character of medical decision-making. The latter sources of paternalism, I submit, are simply pathological in clinicians, and have no credence.

    Google Scholar 

  3. See the next chapter for extensive discussion in this regard.

    Google Scholar 

  4. See the next chapter regarding such ineffectiveness.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1993 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wear, S. (1993). The New Ethos of Patient Autonomy. In: Informed Consent. Clinical Medical Ethics, vol 4. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8122-6_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8122-6_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4219-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-8122-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics