Abstract
One of the more dramatic stories in philosophy of law for two decades (1967–87) is the clash between Hart’s views and those of Ronald Dwoikin, Hart’s former student and successor as Professor of Jurisprudence at Oxford University. Because of the large literature on their views contributed by various authors, people are apt to overlook the many interchanges between Hart and Dworkin themselves on a variety of topics. Here is a brief chronology.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1992 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bayles, M.D. (1992). Hart vs. Dworkin. In: Hart’s Legal Philosophy. Law and Philosophy Library, vol 17. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8086-1_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8086-1_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4208-8
Online ISBN: 978-94-015-8086-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive