Skip to main content

Organizational Demands on Mediation Programs: Problems of Realization

  • Chapter
Restorative Justice on Trial

Part of the book series: Nato Science Series D: (closed) ((ASID,volume 64))

  • 301 Accesses

Abstract

The following analysis of the realization of mediation programs in Germany focuses on three problem areas in the field of mediation practice that hinder a successful introduction of victim-offender mediation (VOM) in Germany. The relevant details given here are based on the author’s experiences as advisor in the program’s planning and organization, as well as his participation in its practical implementation and in continuing education efforts in the field of victim-offender mediation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Integration” refers to VOM as being included as one of the many tasks relegated to the continuing jurisdiction over one party (e.g., for the juvenile court officer responsible for the offender, or for advisors responsible for either the victim or the offender). “Specialization” refers to VOM as an independent activity with no continuing jurisdiction over either party involved. “Partial specialization” refers to VOM as a subfield of activity with no continuing jurisdiction over either party involved (e.g., when one half of the staff conducts TOA and the other half carries out other duties, each with a different group of juveniles).

    Google Scholar 

  2. As a general rule of thumb, one can assume that a full-time mediator is able to process circa 90 cases per year, a part-time mediator circa 40 cases.

    Google Scholar 

  3. This need was anticipated by the German Probation Association from the very beginning. For further documentation concerning this topic, see Marks and Schreckling (1989).

    Google Scholar 

References

  • Marks, E., & Schreckling, J. (1989). Anmerkungen zur aktuellen Lage und zum Handlungsbedarf im Bereich von Täter-Opfer-Ausgleich und Konfliktschichtung. In E. Marks & D. Rössner (Eds.), Täter-Opfer-Ausgleich. Vom zwischenmenschlichen Weg zur Wiederherstellung des Rechtsfriedens (Schriftenreihe der DBH e.V., Vol. 12). Bonn: Forum.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1992 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wandrey, M. (1992). Organizational Demands on Mediation Programs: Problems of Realization. In: Messmer, H., Otto, HU. (eds) Restorative Justice on Trial. Nato Science Series D: (closed), vol 64. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8064-9_34

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8064-9_34

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4128-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-8064-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics