Skip to main content

Is Phylogeny Recapitulating Ontogeny?

  • Chapter
Understanding Origins

Part of the book series: Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science ((BSPS,volume 130))

Abstract

There are three things I would like to accomplish in these comments. First, I would like to mention some of the larger issues addressed by Stuart Kauffnan’s work. They are related to important questions in other fields; pointing out the relationships could be useful for finding the kinds of interdisciplinary connections to which this conference is devoted. Second, I will describe my own perspective on Kauffman’s work; my interests are basically conceptual, not technical. Finally, I want to draw some parallels between arguments about phylogenetic and ontogenetic origins; these parallels cast additional light of Kauffman’s endeavors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alberch, P.: 1982, ‘Developmental constraints in evolutionary processes’, in: Bonner, J. T. (Ed.), Evolution and Development. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, pp. 313–332.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, R.: 1986, ‘Beyond labels and binary oppositions: what can be learnt from the nature/nurture dispute?’ Rivista di Biologia 80, 192–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oyama, S.: 1985, The Ontogeny of Information: Developmental Systems and Evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oyama, S.: 1989, ‘Ontogeny and the central dogma: do developmentalists need the concept of genetic programming in order to have an evolutionary perspective?’ in: Gunnar, M. (Ed.), Minnesota Symposium on Child Psychology, Vol. 22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, K. S.: 1985, ‘Essay review: the relationship between development and evolution’, Oxford Surveys in Evolutionary Biology 2, 220–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster, G. and Goodwin, B. C.: 1982, ‘The origin of species: a structuralist approach’, Journal of Social and Biological Structures 5, 15–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1992 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Oyama, S. (1992). Is Phylogeny Recapitulating Ontogeny?. In: Varela, F.J., Dupuy, JP. (eds) Understanding Origins. Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science, vol 130. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8054-0_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8054-0_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4090-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-8054-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics