Skip to main content

Punctuated Equilibrium and Macroevolution

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Australasian Studies in History and Philosophy of Science ((AUST,volume 11))

Abstract

Hardened Darwinism is the view that the history of life is explained by forces operating on populations of organisms, or perhaps, on their genes. Large scale events and processes are no more than an aggregation of the fate of individual organisms. This story has received some rough treatment in the literature lately, for hierarchical views of evolutionary theory are currently popular. Eldredge, Gould and Stanley1, to name only three, are on the record in urging that there are robust macroevolutionary phenomena, phenomena not captured generation by generation change in gene frequency. Three large scale patterns are most on people’s minds. One is mass extinction. Mass extinctions, its been alleged, are regular and intense. Most importantly, surviving mass extinction is mostly chance; it is not determined by an organism’s suite of adaptations. If so, the shape of the tree of life is determined not by the relative fitness of its various twigs, but by their proximity to an extrinsic, perhaps even extraterrestrial, pruner. A second is Gould’s most recent preoccupation, the “cone of decreasing diversity”. The theme of his 1989 is his idea that life reached its maximal diversity at the Cambrian explosion; diversity has declined since. On Gould’s view, natural selection played no central role in either the establishment of that diversity or its decline2.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. See for example Eldredge (1985a) Time Frames

    Google Scholar 

  2. Simon & Schuster, Eldredge (1985b) The Unfinished Synthesis

    Google Scholar 

  3. OUP and Eldredge (1989) Macroevolutionary Dynamics, McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  4. See also Vrba & Eldredge (1984) Individuals, Hierarchies and Processes: Towards a More Complete Evolutionary Theory’ Paleobiology 10, pp 146–171

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gould (1980d) Is a New and General Theory of Evolution Emerging?’ Paleobiology, 6, pp, 119–130

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gould (1983) The Meaning of Punctuated Equilibrium & Its Role in Validating a Hierarchical Approach to Macroevolution’ Scientia, 1 pp 135–157

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gould (1985) The Paradox of the First tier: An Agenda for Paleobiology’ Paleobiology, 11, pp 2–12

    Google Scholar 

  8. Salthe (1985) Evolving Hierarchical Systems ; Columbia UP

    Google Scholar 

  9. Stanley (1981) The New Evolutionary Timetable, Basic Books. For very sceptical views of the whole punctua-tional enterprise

    Google Scholar 

  10. see Dawkins (1986) The Blind Watchmaker

    Google Scholar 

  11. W.W. Norton and Hoffman (1989) Arguments on Evolution, OUP.

    Google Scholar 

  12. I discuss Gould on diversity in Sterelny ‘Gould’s ‘Wonderful Life”, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gould especially; see for example his (1980b) The Episodic Nature of Evolutionary Change’, and (1980c) The Return of the Hopeful Monster’ both in Gould (1980a) The Panda’s Thumb ; W.W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sober (1984) The Nature of Selection , MITPress (section9.4) and Hoffman 1989 (chapter 7) have also made this crucial distinction between pattern and process in punctuated thought.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mayr seems to defend an intermediate position; the genetics of speciation is abnormal not because of macromutation but because founder populations are not just under greater selectional pressure, but also because they exhibit greater variability (cf Mayr (1988a) Towards a New Philosophy of Biology, Harvard UP, Cambridge pp 473–4).

    Google Scholar 

  16. For a pellucid exposition of this, see Dawkins 1986 pp 66–74, but the general point is uncontroversial.

    Google Scholar 

  17. See for example Mayr 1988a chapter 21.

    Google Scholar 

  18. For a more detailed and careful reconciliation of adaptive hypotheses with due modesty about the optimizing power of natural selection see part I of Godfrey-Smith (forthcoming) Teleometry and the Philosophy of Mind. Sober doesnot agree with this attempt to drive a wedge between optimality theory and adaptation; for his views on these issues see his (1987) ‘What is Adaptationism?’ in Dupre (1987) The Latest on the Best; MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  19. This line of thought is particularly prominent in Eldredge; seehis 1985 a&b, and his 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  20. For the general distinction between the causally agnostic “selection of” some trait versus the causally committed “selection for” it, see Sober 1984a 3.2. For its application to species, see Vrba (1984) “What is Species Selection?” Systematic Zoology 33 pp 318–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hull (1988) Interactors versus Vehicles’

    Google Scholar 

  22. in Plotkin (1988) The Role of Behavior in Evolution ; MIT Press

    Google Scholar 

  23. and Dawkins (1982) The Extended Phenotype ; OUP, chapter 6.

    Google Scholar 

  24. For ease of exposition I will take it that our candidate replicator is the species, not the species gene pool, for nothing I say depends on this distinction. For similar reasons, in this paper I will be neutral on the gene/organism debate.

    Google Scholar 

  25. For example, in Part 4 of Maynard Smith (1989) Did Darwin Get it Right? , Chapman and Hall, and 9.3/9.4 of Sober 1984a.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Some see these claims as tantamount to the idea that species are individuals; see Ghiselin (1974) ‘A Radical Solution to the Species Problem’ Systematic Zoology 23, pp 536–544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Hull (1978) ‘A Matter of Individuality’ Philosophy of Science 45 pp 335–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. reprinted in Sober (1984b) Conceptual Issues In Evolutionary Biology , MIT Press

    Google Scholar 

  29. and especially Hull (1987) ‘Genealogical Actors in Ecological Roles’ Biology and Philosophy, 2 pp 168–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. reprinted in Hull (1989) The Metaphysics of Evolution , State University of New York Press, New York. For arguments that we can pose the biological question independently of this issue see Kitcher (1989) ‘Some Puzzles about Species’ in Ruse What the Philosophy of Biology Is, Kluwer, and Hoffman 1989 chapter 8.

    Google Scholar 

  31. See Kitcher 1989 on the idealizations implicit in the etiological species concept’.

    Google Scholar 

  32. See e. g. Williams (1966) Adaptation and Natural Selection, Princeton University Press, especially pp 96–98.

    Google Scholar 

  33. In the final chapter of his 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  34. See Sober 1984a pp 259–62 for a more detailed discussion of a parallel example drawing a similar moral.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Schull (1990) ‘Are Species Intelligent?’ Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13 pp 63–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. See Ridley (1989) The Cladistic Solution to the Species Concept Biology & Philosophy 4, pp 1–16 for a defense of this picture of species and speciation.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. That is, changes in survivability and resource use, as contrasted with the sort of changes produced by “sexual selection”.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Thanks to John Maynard Smith for his comments on an very early version of this paper, and to Philip Kitcher, David Hull, and, especially, Elliot Sober for comments on the most recent version

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1992 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sterelny, K. (1992). Punctuated Equilibrium and Macroevolution. In: Griffiths, P. (eds) Trees of Life. Australasian Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, vol 11. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8038-0_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8038-0_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4153-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-8038-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics