Skip to main content

Does Quantification Involve Identity?

  • Chapter
Peter Geach: Philosophical Encounters

Part of the book series: Synthese Library ((SYLI,volume 213))

Abstract

How are ‘every’,’ some’ and their like related to ‘the same as’? Is there any ground for saying that an understanding of the former—of expressions of generality—presupposes an understanding of the latter— of expressions of identity? Let us begin with formalised languages, those framed by use of the apparatus of predicate logic. In a second-order language, identity is definable, so no problem arises. If, in a first-order language, identity is taken as primitive, it is at least un-problematic that an interpretation of the language must involve a relation of identity over the domain. But suppose that a language is framed within first-order logic without identity: is there then any need to assume that an interpretation of the language will involve or invoke a relation of identity over the domain?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. W. V. Quine, review of P. T. Geach, Reference and Generality, Philosophical Review, 1964, 100-104.

    Google Scholar 

  2. The definition as stated is adapted for the case when the only non-logical constants of L are predicates. It will be obvious how it is to be modified for the general case in which L contains also function symbols.

    Google Scholar 

  3. P.T. Geach, ‘Ontological Relativity and Relative Identity’, in M.K. Munitz (ed.), Logic and Ontology, New York University Press, New York, 1973, pp. 287–302.

    Google Scholar 

  4. P.T. Geach, ‘Names and Identity’, in S. Guttenplan (ed.), Mind and Language, Clarendon Press, Oxford, p. 157.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Op. cit. pp. 156-157.

    Google Scholar 

  6. ‘Ontological Relativity and Relative Identity’ (see note 3 above), p. 290.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Op. cit. p. 294.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1991 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dummett, M. (1991). Does Quantification Involve Identity?. In: Lewis, H.A. (eds) Peter Geach: Philosophical Encounters. Synthese Library, vol 213. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-7885-1_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-7885-1_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4072-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-7885-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics