Advertisement

Optimum Design of Laminated Composite Structures

  • Raphael T. Haftka
  • Zafer Gürdal
  • Manohar P. Kamat
Part of the Solid Mechanics and Its Applications book series (SMIA, volume 1)

Abstract

Because of their superior mechanical properties, laminated composite materials are finding a wide range of applications in structural design, especially for lightweight structures that have stringent stiffness and strength requirements. Designing with laminated composites, on the other hand, has become a challenge for the designer because of a wide range of parameters that can be varied, and because of the complex behavior of these structures that mandates sophisticated analysis techniques. Finding an efficient composite structural design that meets the requirements of a certain application can be achieved not only by sizing the cross-sectional areas and member thicknesses, but also by global or local tailoring of the material properties through selective use of orientation, number, and stacking sequence of laminae that make up the composite laminate. The increased number of design variables is both a blessing and a nightmare for the designer, in that he has more control to fine-tune his structure to meet the requirements of a design situation, but only if he can figure out how to select all those design variables. The possibility of achieving a design that meets multiple requirements efficiently, coupled with the difficulty in selecting the values of a large set of design variables makes structural optimization an obvious tool for the design of laminated composite structures.

Keywords

Design Variable Stiffened Panel Structural Efficiency Laminate Composite Structure Lamination Parameter 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Jones, R. M., “Mechanics of Composite Materials,” McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York, 1975.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Tsai, S. W., and Pagano N. J., “Invariant Properties of Composite Materials,” Composite Materials Workshop, Technomic Publishing Co., Westport, pp. 233253, 1968.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Caprino, G., and Crivelli-Visconti, I., “A Note on Specially Orthotropic Laminates,” J. Comp. Matls., 16, pp. 395–399, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Gunnink, J. W., “Comment on A Note on Specially Orthotropic Laminates,” J. Comp. Matls., 17, pp. 508–510, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Kandil, N., and Verchery, G., “New Methods of Design for Stacking Sequences of Laminates,” Proceedings of the International Conference on “Computer Aided Design in Composite Materials Technology,” Eds. Brebbia, C. A., de Wilde, W. P., and Blain, W. R., pp. 243–257, 1988.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Schmit, L. A., and Farshi, B., “Optimum Laminate Design for Strength and Stiffness,” Int. J. Num. Meth. Engng., 7, pp. 519–536, 1973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    Park, W. J., “An Optimal Design of Simple Symmetric Laminates Under the First Ply Failure Criterion, ” J. Comp. Matis., 16, pp. 341–355, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    Massard, T. N., “Computer Sizing of Composite Laminates for Strength,” J. Reinf. Plastics and Composites, 3, pp. 300–345, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    Tsai, S. W., and Hahn, H. T., Introduction to Composite Materials, Technomic Publishing Co., Inc., Lancaster, Pa., 1980.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Tsai, S. W., “Strength Theories of Filamentary Structures,” in R. T. Schwartz and H. S. Schwartz (eds.), Fundamental Aspects of Fiber Reinforced Plastic, Wiley Interscience, New York, 1968, pp. 3–11.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    Brandmaier, H. E., “Optimum Filament Orientation Criteria,” J. Composite Materials, 4, pp. 422–425, 1970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    Miki, M., “Material Design of Composite Laminates with Required In-plane Properties,” Progress in Science and Engineering of Composites, Eds., T. Hayashi, K. Kawata, and S. Umekawa, ICCM-IV, Tokyo, pp. 1725–1731, 1982.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    Miki, M., “A Graphical Method for Designing Fibrous Laminated Composites with Required In-plane Stiffness,” Trans. JSCM, 9, 2, pp. 51–55, 1983.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    Schmit, L. A., and Farshi, B., “Optimum Design of Laminated Fibre Composite Plates,” Int. J. Num. Meth. Engng., 11, pp. 623–640, 1977.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    Bert, C. W., “Optimal Design of a Composite-material Plate to Maximize its Fundamental Frequency,” J. Sound and Vibration, 50 (2), pp. 229–237, 1977.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    Rao, S. S., and Singh K., “Optimum Design of Laminates with Natural Frequency Constraints,” J. Sound and Vibration, 67 (1) pp. 101–112, 1979.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    Mesquita, L., and Kamat, M. P., “Optimization of Stiffened Laminated Composite Plates with Frequency Constraints,” Eng. Opt., 11, pp. 77–88, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    Kengtung, C., “Sensitivity Analysis and a mixed Approach to the Optimization of Symmetric Layered Composite Plates,” Eng. Opt., 9, pp. 233–248, 1986.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    Pedersen, P., “On Sensitivity Analysis and Optimal Design of Specially Orthotropic Laminates,” Eng. Opt., 11, pp. 305–316, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    Muc, A., “Optimal Fiber Orientation for Simply-Supported, Angle-Ply Plates Under Biaxial Compression,” Comp. Struc., 9, pp. 161–172, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    Miki, M., “Optimum Design of Laminated Composite Plates Subject to Axial Compression,” Composites’ 86: Recent Advances in Japan and the United States, Eds., Kawata, K., Umekawa, S., and Kobayashi, A., Proc. Japan-U.S. CCM-III, Tokyo, pp. 673–680, 1986.Google Scholar
  22. [22]
    Shin, Y. S., Haftka, R. T., Watson, L. T., and Plant, R. H., “Design of Laminated Plates for Maximum Buckling Load”, J. Composite Materials, 23, pp. 348–369, 1989CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    Stroud, W. J., and Agranoff, N., “Minimum-mass Design of Filamentary Composite Panels Under Combined Loadings: Design Procedure Based on Simplified Buckling Equations,” NASA TN D-8257, 1976.Google Scholar
  24. [24]
    Timoshenko, S., Theory of Elastic Stability, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1936.Google Scholar
  25. [25]
    Stein, M., and Mayers, J., “Compressive Buckling of Simply Supported Curved Plates and Cylinders of Sandwich Construction,” NACA TN 2601, 1952.Google Scholar
  26. [26]
    Advanced Composites Design Guide. Vols. I-V, Third Edition, U.S. Air Force, Jan. 1973.Google Scholar
  27. [27]
    Lekhnitskii, S. G., Anisotropic Plates. Translated by Tsai, S. W., and Cheron, T., Gordon and Breach Sci. Publ., Inc., 1968.Google Scholar
  28. [28]
    Hague, D. S., and Glatt, C. R., “A Guide to the Automated Engineering and Scientific Optimization Program, AESOP, ” NASA CR-73201, April 1968.Google Scholar
  29. [29]
    Stroud, W. J., Agranoff, N., and Anderson, M. S., “Minimum-mass Design of Filamentary Composite Panels Under Combined Loads: Design Procedure Based on a Rigorous Buckling Analysis, ” NASA TN D-8417, July 1977.Google Scholar
  30. [30]
    Wittrick, W. H., and Williams, F. W., “Buckling and Vibration of Anisotropic or Isotropic Plate Assemblies Under Combined Loadings, ” Int. J. Mech. Sci., 16, 4, April 1974, pp. 209–239.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. [31]
    Plank, R. J., and Williams, F. W., “Critical Buckling of Some Stiffened Panels in Compression, Shear and Bending, ” Aeronautical Q., XXV, August 1974, pp. 165–179.Google Scholar
  32. [32]
    Vanderplaats, G. N., “CONMIN - A Fortran Program for Constrained Function Minimization, User’s Manual,” NASA TM X - 62, 282, 1973.Google Scholar
  33. [33]
    Stroud, W. J., and Anderson, M. S., “PASCO: Structural Panel Analysis and Sizing Code, Capability and Analytical Foundations, ” NASA TM 80181, November 1981.Google Scholar
  34. [34]
    Anderson, M. S., Stroud, W. J., Durling, B. J., and Hennessy, K. W., “PASCO: Structural Panel Analysis and Sizing Code, User’s Manual, ” NASA TM 80182, November 1981.Google Scholar
  35. [35]
    Giles, G. L., and Anderson, M. S., “Effects of Eccentricities and Lateral Pressure on the Design of Stiffened Compression Panels,” NASA TN D-6784, 1972.Google Scholar
  36. [36]
    Swanson, G. D., and Gurdal, Z., “Structural Efficiency Study of Graphite-epoxy Aircraft Rib Structures,” AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS 29th Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, Williamsburg, VA., April 18–20, pp. 85–97, 1988.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  37. [37]
    Stroud, W.J., Greene, W.H., and Anderson, M.S., “Buckling Loads of Stiffened Panels Subjected to Combined Longitudinal Compression and Shear: Results Obtained With PASCO, EAL, and STAGS Computer Programs,” NASA TP 2215, January 1984.Google Scholar
  38. [38]
    Williams, F.W., and Kennedy, D., “User’s Guide to VICON, VIPASA with Constraints,” Department of Civil Engineering and Building Technology, University of Wales Institute of Science and Technology, August, 1984.Google Scholar
  39. [39]
    Williams, F.W., and Anderson, M.S., “Incorporation of Lagrangian Multipliers into an Algorithm for Finding Exact Natural Frequencies or Critical Buckling Loads,” Int. J. M.ch. Sci., 25, 8, pp. 579–584, 1983.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. [40]
    Dickson, J. N., Cole, R. T., and Wang, J. T. S., “Design of Stiffened Composite Panels in the Postbuckling Range, ” In Fibrous Composites in Structural Design, Eds. Lenoe, E. M., Oblinger, D. W., and Burke, J. J., Plenum Press, New York, pp. 313–327, 1980.Google Scholar
  41. [41]
    Dickson, J. N., Biggers, S. B., “Design and Analysis of a Stiffened Composite Fuselage Panel, ” NASA CR-159302, August 1980.Google Scholar
  42. [42]
    Bushnell, D., “PANDA2 — Program for Minimum Weight Design of Stiffened, Composite, Locally Buckled Panels,” Comput. Struct., 25, pp. 469–605, 1987.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  43. [43]
    Shirk, M. H., Hertz, T. J., and Weisshaar, T. A., “Aeroelastic Tailoring–Theory, Practice, and Promise, ” J. Aircraft, 23, 1, pp. 6–18, 1986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. [44]
    Lynch, R. W., and Rogers, W. A., “Aeroelastic Tailoring of Composite Materials to Improve Performance, ” Proceedings of the AIAA/ASME/SAE, 17th Structures Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, King of Prussia, PA., May 5–7, pp. 61–68, 1976.Google Scholar
  45. [45]
    McCullers, L. A., “Automated Design of Advanced Composite Structures, ” Proceedings of the ASME Structural Optimization Symposium, AMD-7, pp. 119133, 1974.Google Scholar
  46. [46]
    McCullers, L. A., and Lynch, R. W., “Dynamic Characteristics of Advanced Filamentary Composite Structures, ” AFFDL-TR-73–111, vol. I I, Sept. 1974.Google Scholar
  47. [47]
    Haftka, R. T., “Structural Optimization with Aeroelastic Constraints: A Survey of US Applications, ” Int. J. of Vehicle Design, 7, 3 /4, pp. 381–392, 1986.Google Scholar
  48. [48]
    McCullers, L. A., and Lynch, R. W., “Composite Wing Design for Aeroelastic Tailoring Requirements, ” Air Force Conference on Fibrous Composites in Flight Vehicle Design, Sept. 1972.Google Scholar
  49. [49]
    Fant, J. A., “An Advanced Composite Wing for the F16, ” paper presented at the 22nd National SAMPE Symposium and Exhibition, San Diego, April 1977.Google Scholar
  50. [50]
    Gimmestad, D., “Aeroelastic Tailoring of a Composite Winglet for KC-135, ” AIAA Paper No. 81–0607, presented at the AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS 22nd Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, Atlanta, GA., April 1981.Google Scholar
  51. [51]
    Wilkinson, K., Markowitz, J., Lerner, E., George, D., and Batill, S. M., “FASTOP: A Flutter and Strength Optimization Program for Lifting Surface Structures, ” J. Aircraft, 14, 6, pp. 581–587, 1977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. [52]
    Neill, D. J., Johnson, E. H., and Canfield, R. A., “ASTROS — A Multidisciplinary Automated Structural Design Tool, ” Proceedings of the 28th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS Structures Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, Monterey, CA., April 6–8, Part 1, pp. 44–53, 1987.Google Scholar
  53. [53]
    Vanderplaats, G. N., “ADS — A Fortran Program for Automated Design Synthesis, ” NASA-CR-177985, Sept. 1985.Google Scholar
  54. [54]
    Stroud, W. J., “Optimization of Composite Structures,” NASA TM 84544, August 1982.Google Scholar
  55. [55]
    Nagendra, S., Haftka, R. T., and Gürdal, Z., “Design of Stiffened Composite Plate with a Hole, ” To be published, Proceedings of the American Society for Composites, Fourth Technical Conference, October 3–6, 1989.Google Scholar
  56. [56]
    Olson, G. R., and Vanderplaats, G. N., “A Method for Nonlinear Optimization with Discrete Design Variables, ” AIAA Paper No. 87–0789, presented at the AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS 28nd Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, Monterey, CA., April 6–8, pp. 343–350, 1987.Google Scholar
  57. [57]
    Shin, D. K., Gürdal, Z., and Griffin, O. H., Jr., “A Penalty Approach for Nonlinear Optimization with Discrete Design Variables, ” Proceedings of the symposium on Recent Advances in Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, Hampton, VA., September 28–30, pp. 1291–1302, 1988.Google Scholar
  58. [58]
    Mesquita, L., and Kamat, M. P., “Structural Optimization for Control of Stiffened Laminated Composite Structures, ” J. Sound and Vibration, 116, 1, pp. 33–48, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Raphael T. Haftka
    • 1
  • Zafer Gürdal
    • 2
  • Manohar P. Kamat
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Aerospace and Ocean EngineeringVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State UniversityBlacksburgUSA
  2. 2.Department of Engineering Science and MechanicsVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State UniversityBlacksburgUSA
  3. 3.School of Aerospace EngineeringGeorgia Institute of TechnologyAtlantaUSA

Personalised recommendations