Greek Philosophers on Euthanasia and Suicide

  • John M. Cooper
Part of the Philosophy and Medicine book series (PHME, volume 35)


The word “euthanasia” is not always used and understood in the same way. Nor, for that matter, is “suicide”. The first thing to do in approaching the Greek philosophers’ views about euthanasia and suicide is, therefore, to be clear about the senses of these words in which there existed for the philosophers of Greece corresponding moral categories. Which of the different kinds of action that might be called, or have by someone or other in modem discussions been called, euthanasia or suicide seemed to the Greek philosophers sufficiently interesting or problematic, from the moral point of view, so that they developed lines of argument and analysis in order to accommodate them? And which of these did they group together sufficiently closely for it to make sense to speak of Greek views on the morality of euthanasia or suicide? The answers to these questions will not just help us to avoid misunderstanding, by making it clear in what senses of these words it is acceptable to speak of Greek philosophers’ views on euthanasia and suicide. They will also constitute an important first step in the substantial characterization of the Greek tradition in moral theory: one learns a lot about the character of any moral theory by seeing how, given that theory and its intellectual resources, the different kinds of human actions are arranged in significant groupings and which ones of these groupings are seen to call for philosophical comment.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    Apelt, 0.: 1912, Platonische Aufsaetze, B.G. Teubner, Leipzig.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Arnim, J. von: 1903, Stoicorum Veterum Fragmenta (= SVF), B.G. Teubner, Leipzig.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Burkert, W.: 1972, Lore and Science in Ancient Pythagoreanism, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Harder, R.: 1956, Plotins Schriften, vol. I (b), Felix Meiner, Hamburg.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Hegel, G.W.F.: 1952, Hegel’s Philosophy of Right, trans. by T.M. Knox, Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Lecky, W.E.H.: 1869, A History of European Morals from Augustus to Charlemagne, Longmans, Green, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    Plato: 1916, Die Gesetze, trans. by O. Apelt, Felix Meiner, Leipzig.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Plato: 1937, The Republic, Books I—V, trans. by P. Shorey, Harvard University Press ( Loeb Classical Library ), Cambridge.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Plato: 1970, The Laws, trans. by T. Saunders, Penguin, London.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Plotinus: 1966, Enneads 1–2, vol. 1, trans. by A.H. Armstrong, Harvard University Press, ( Loeb Classical Library ), Cambridge.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    Rist, J.M.: 1967, Plotinus: The Road to Reality, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    Rose, H.J.: 1914, ‘Euthanasia’, in J. Hastings (ed.), Encyclopedia of Religion and Ethics, T and T Clarke, Edinburgh, vol. 5, 598–601.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    Shorey, P.: 1933, What Plato Said, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    Stewart, J.A.: 1892, Notes on the Nicomachean Ethics of Aristotle, vol. I, Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    Westerink, L.G.: 1976, The Greek Commentaries on Plato’s Phaedo, vol. I, North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • John M. Cooper
    • 1
  1. 1.Princeton UniversityPrincetonUSA

Personalised recommendations