Advertisement

Concepts of Progeny Test Analysis

  • Timothy L. White
  • Gary R. Hodge
Part of the Forestry Sciences book series (FOSC, volume 33)

Abstract

Forest tree breeders establish progeny tests primarily to predict breeding values of parents based on the performance of their offspring. The breeder then ranks parents according to their predicted breeding values (or some function of their predicted breeding values) to make selections. Progeny tests are generally replicated over a number of years and planting locations with the objective of sampling a wide range of environmental conditions. Because of large numbers of parents being evaluated, economic incentives to establish tests quickly, differential survival, etc. there is often a great deal of unbalance across all progeny tests in forest tree breeding programs. For example, all families are not always planted in the same year or location, and some families may be represented at only a few sites (Hatcher et al. 1981, Cotterill et al. 1983). This can make the goal of accurately and precisely ranking parents quite complex as data from a large number of progeny tests with diverse characteristics must be combined into one value representing the relative genetic worth of the parent. It is common in forestry to calculate a family mean of all offspring of a particular parent in a given test, and then somehow average those means across all tests in which the parent is represented. Different approaches to calculating the average, and different transformations of the data are sometimes utilized to deal with the problems associated with ’messy’ progeny test data.

Keywords

Genetic Correlation Growth Trait General Combine Ability Volume Growth Progeny Test 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Timothy L. White
    • 1
  • Gary R. Hodge
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of ForestryUniversity of FloridaGainesvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations