Skip to main content

Assessing the Impact of Federal Industrial R&D Expenditure on Private R&D Activity in the United States

  • Chapter
The Relations between Defence and Civil Technologies

Part of the book series: NATO ASI Series ((ASID,volume 46))

Abstract

A number of studies have attempted to determine the effect of US government expenditures on research and development (R&D) performed in industry on the quantity of private investment in R&D, by analysing the statistical relationship betweed federal and company R&D spending at the firm, industry, and aggregate levels(l). These studies are restricted to the US case owing to the lack of comparable data for other countries. The possibility that private decisions to invest in R&D may be influenced by federal industrial R&D spending is regarded as worthy of careful investigation, in part because numerous studies have demonstrated that private R&D expenditure has a significant, positive impact on total factor productivity (TFP). Although most analysts have failed to find evidence of a similar direct productivity impact of federal R&D expenditure(2), federal R&D may nevertheless have a considerable indirect impact (positive or negative) on TFP if it influences private R&D investment decisions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Federal Council on Science and Technology, Annual report on government patent policy, combined December 1971 and December 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flamm, Kenneth (1987a), Targeting the Computer: Government Support and International Competition (Washington: Brookings).

    Google Scholar 

  • Flamm, Kenneth (1987b), Creating the Computer: Government, Industry, and High Technology (Washington: Brookings).

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R.B. (1975), “Supply and salary adjustments to the changing science manpower market: physics, 1948–1973”, American Economic Review, Vol. 65, No.l, March, pp.27–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R.B., (1976), “A cobweb model of the supply and starting salary of new engineers,” Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp.236–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griliches, Z., and F. Lichtenberg (1984), “R&D and productivity at the industrial level: is there still a relationship?”, in Z. Griliches (ed.), R&D, Patents, and Productivity (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamien, M., and N. Schwartz (1982), Market Structure and Innovation (Cambridge: Cambridge university Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, D. and N. Terleckyj (1983), “Effects of government R&D on private R&D investment and productivity: a macroeconomic analysis”, Bell Journal of Economic, Vol. 14, pp.551–561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenberg, F. (1984), “The relationship between federal contract R&D and company R&D”, American Economic Association Papers and Proceedings, May.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenberg, F. (1987), “The Effect of Government Funding on Private Industrial Research and Development: A Re­assessment”, Journal of Industrial Economics, September, XXXVI(1), pp.97–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenberg, F. (1988), “The Private R&D Investment Response to Federal Design and Technical Competitions”, American Economic Review, March, forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansfield, E. , “Price indexes for R and D inputs, 1969–83”, mimeo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansfield, E. (1983), “Commentary,” on “Capital formation, technology, and economic policy”, in Industrial Change and Public Policy, a symposium sponsored by the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mowery, D. and N. Rosenberg (1979), “The influence of market demand upon innovation: a critical review of some recent empirical studies”, Research Policy, Vol. 8, pp.102–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nadiri, M. and I. Prucha (1985), “Comparison and analysis of productivity growth and R&D investment in the electrical machinery industries of the United States and Japan”, paper presented at the National Bureau of Economic Research Conference on Productivity Growth in Japan and the United States, Cambridge, MA, August 25–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Science Board (1983), Science indicators 1982 (Washington, D.C.).

    Google Scholar 

  • National Science Foundation (1985), Federal funds for research and development, fiscal years 1983, 1984, and 1985, Vol. XXXIII (detailed statistical tables) (NSF 84–336) (Washington, D.C.).

    Google Scholar 

  • National Science Foundation (1985), A comparative analysis of information on national industrial R&D expenditures (NSF 85–311) (Washington, D.C.).

    Google Scholar 

  • National Science Foundation (1984), The 1982 postcensal survey of scientists and engineers (NSF 84–330) (Washington, D.C.).

    Google Scholar 

  • National Science Foundation, Research and development in industry, various years.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R. (ed.) (1982), Government and technical progress, a cross-industry analysis (New York: Pergamon Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • New York Times (1985), “For military suppliers, growth uncertainties”, Section 12, page 10, October 13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reppy, J. (1976), “The IR&D program of the Department of Defense”, Cornell university Peace Studies Program Occasional Paper No. 6, March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reppy, J. (1977), “Defence department payments for ‘company-financed R&D”, Research Policy, Vol. 6, pp.396–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schankerman, M., and A. Pakes (1985), “Estimates of the value of patent rights in European countries during the post-1950 period”, National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 1650, June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, F.M. (1984), “Using linked patent and R&D data to measure interindustry technology flows”, in Z. Griliches (ed.), R&D, patents and productivity (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1988 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lichtenberg, F.R. (1988). Assessing the Impact of Federal Industrial R&D Expenditure on Private R&D Activity in the United States. In: Gummett, P., Reppy, J. (eds) The Relations between Defence and Civil Technologies. NATO ASI Series, vol 46. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-7803-5_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-7803-5_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-8312-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-7803-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics