Skip to main content

Belief-Sentences and the Limits of Semantics

  • Chapter
Processes, Beliefs, and Questions

Part of the book series: Synthese Language Library ((SLAP,volume 16))

Abstract

One of the goals of the conference of which this paper is a part is to compare the enterprise of formal semantics with that of procedure-oriented psychological semantics. The former has traditionally been the domain of logicians and philosophers, the latter the domain of psychologists and computer scientists, with some linguists on each side. The problem that is evident at the outset is that semantics is treated very differently within these two enterprises, each side seemingly committed to assumptions that lead to inadequacies by the other’s criteria. A fruitful comparison could lead to either of two outcomes, which we might characterize roughly as the “Separatist” position and the “Common Goals” position.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Barwise, Jon: (1981) ‘Scenes and other situations’, Journal of Philosophy 78.7, 369–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barwise, Jon: (1981) ‘Semantic innocence and uncompromising situations’, in P. A. French, T. E. Uehling and H. K. Wettstein, eds., Midwest Studies in Philosophy VI, Univ. of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, pp. 387–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bigelow, John: (1978a) ‘Semantics of thinking, speaking, and translation’, in F. Guenthner and M. Guenthner-Reutter, eds., Meaning and Translation, New York University Press, New York, pp. 109–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bigelow, John: (1978b) ‘Believing in semantics’, Linguistics and Philosophy 2, 101–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carnap, Rudolf (1947) Meaning and Necessity: A Study in Semantics and Modal Logic, Univ. of Chicago Press, (enlarged ed. 1956 ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam: (1965) Aspects of the Theory of Syntax, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cresswell, M. J.: (1978) ‘Semantic competence’, in F. Guenthner and M. Guenthner-Reutter, eds„ Meaning and Translation, New York University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cresswell, M. J.: (1982) ‘The autonomy of semantics’, this volume, pp. 69–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, Donald and Gilbert Harman, eds.: (1975), The Logic of Grammar, Dickinson Pub. Co., Encino, Calif.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, Donald: (1970) ‘Semantics for natural languages’, in Linguaggi nella società e nella tecnica, Edizioni di Comunità, Milano, pp. 177–188. Reprinted in Davidson and Harman, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowty, David: (1980), Word Meaning and Montague Grammar, Synthese Language Library, D. Reidel Publishing Co., Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harman, Gilbert: (1973) ‘Against universal semantic representation’, unpublished manuscript (?), Princeton University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hintikka, Jaakko: (1962) Knowledge and Belief, Cornell Univ. Press, Ithaca, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson-Laird, Philip: (1977) ‘Procedural semantics’, Cognition 5, 189–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson-Laird, Philip: (1982) ‘Formal semantics and the-psychology of meaning’, this volume, pp. 1–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, Jerrold J.: 1972 ) Semantic Theory, Harper & Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kripke, Saul: (1972) ‘Naming and necessity’ in D. Davidson and G. Harman, eds., Semantics of Natural Language, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladusaw, William: (1979) Polarity Sensitivity as Inherent Scope Relations, unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Texas, Austin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, David: (1970) ‘General semantics’, Synthese 2, 18–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linebarger, Marcia: (1980) The Grammar of Negative Polarity Items, unpublished doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linsky, L.: (1977) ‘Believing and necessity’, Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 50, 526–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loar, Brian: (1976) ‘Two theories of meaning’, in G. Evans and J. McDowell, eds., Truth and Meaning: Essays in Semantics, Oxford Univ. Press, 138–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mates, Benson: (1950) ‘Synonymity’, in Meaning and Interpretation, Univ. of Calif. Publications in Philosophy 25, 201–226. Also in L. Linsky, Semantics and the Philosophy of Language, Urbana, 1952.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, George A. and Philip N. Johnson-Laird: (1976) Language and Perception, The Belknap Press of Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montague, Richard: (1970) ‘Universal grammar’, reprinted in Montague (1974), pp. 222–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montague, Richard: (1973) ‘The proper treatment of quantification in ordinary English’, reprinted in Montague (1974), pp. 247–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montague, Richard: (1974) Formal Philosophy: Selected Papers of Richard Montague, edited and with an introduction by Richmond Thomason, Yale Univ. Press, New Haven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Partee, Barbara: (1972) ‘The semantics of belief-sentences’, in J. Hintikka, J. Moravcsik, and P. Suppes, eds., Approaches to Natural Language, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Partee, Barbara: (1979) ‘Semantics—mathematics or psychology?’, in R. Bäuerle, U. Egli, and A. von Stechow (eds.), Semantics from Different Points of View, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 1–14.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, Hilary: (1954) ‘Synonymity and the analysis of belief-sentences’, Analysis 14, 114–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, Hilary: (1975) The meaning of “meaning”’, in K. Gunderson, ed., Language, Mind and Knowledge, Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science V II, Univ. of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, Hilary: (1978) ‘Reference and understanding’, in Meaning and the Moral Sciences, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W. V. O.: (1960) Word and Object, MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sellars, Wilfrid: (1955) ‘Putnam on Synonymity and Belief’, Analysis 15, 117–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sgall, P., E. HajiZovâ, and O. Prochazka: (1977) ‘On the role of linguistic semantics’, Theoretical Linguistics 4, 31–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, Muffy: (1979) ‘Some thoughts on propositional attitudes, psychological meanings, and intensions in Montague Grammar’, unpublished manuscript, Temple University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stalnaker, Robert: (1978) ‘Assertion’, in Peter Cole, ed., Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 9: Pragmatics, Academic Press, N.Y. ( 315–332 ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods, William: (1979) ‘Procedural semantics and a theory of meaning’, paper presented at the University of Texas Conference on semantics of natural language and natural language processing.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1982 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Partee, B.H. (1982). Belief-Sentences and the Limits of Semantics. In: Peters, S., Saarinen, E. (eds) Processes, Beliefs, and Questions. Synthese Language Library, vol 16. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-7668-0_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-7668-0_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-8366-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-7668-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics