The Autonomy of Semantics

  • M. J. Cresswell
Part of the Synthese Language Library book series (SLAP, volume 16)


I’m going to begin by telling you what I think is the most certain thing I know about meaning. Perhaps it’s the only certain thing. It is this. If we have two sentences A and B, and A is true and B is false, then A and B do not mean the same.


Predicate Calculus Propositional Attitude Special Science Impossible World Structure Meaning 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    Belnap, N. D., ‘How a computer should think,’ in G. Ryle (ed.), Contemporary Aspects of Philosophy, Oriel Press, 1977, pp. 30–56.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Bennett, J. F., Linguistic Behaviour, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1976.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Bigelow, J. C., ‘Believing in semantics,’ Linguistics and Philosophy 2 (1978), pp. 101–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Cresswell, M. J., ‘Functions of propositions,’ The Journal of Symbolic Logic 31 (1966), pp. 545–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Cresswell, M. J., ‘Classical intensional logics,’ Theoria 36 (1970), pp. 347–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Cresswell, M. J., ‘Intensional logics and logical truth,’ Journal of Philosophical Logic 1 (1972), pp. 2–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    Cresswell, M. J., Logics and Languages, London, Methuen, 1973.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Cresswell, M. J., ‘The semantics of degree,’ in B. H. Partee, ed., Montague Grammar, New York, Academic Press, 1976, pp. 261–292.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Cresswell, M. J., ‘Hyperintensional logic,’ Studia Logica 34 (1975), pp. 25–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    Cresswell, M. J., ‘Categorical languages,’ Studia Logica 36 (1977), pp. 257–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    Cresswell, M. J., ‘Semantic competence,’ in F. Guenthner and M. GuenthnerReutter, eds., Meaning and Translation, London, Duckworth, 1978, pp. 9–27.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    Cresswell, M. J., ‘Can Epistemology be naturalized,’ Southwestern Journal of Philosophy 9 (1979), pp. 19–30.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    Cresswell, M. J., ‘Semantics and logic,’ Theoretical Linguistics 5 (1978) pp. 1930.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    Cresswell, M. J., ‘Quotational theories of propositional attitudes’ Journal of Philosophical Logic 9 (1980), pp. 17–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    Dunn, J. M., ‘Intuitive semantics for first-degree entailments and “coupled trees”,’ Philosophical Studies 29 (1976), pp. 149–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    Fodor, J. A., The Language of Thought, New York, Thomas Y. Crowell, 1975.Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    Hintikka, K. J. J., ‘On the logic of perception,’ Models for Modalities, Dordrecht, Reidel, 1969, pp. 151–183.Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    Hintikka, K. J. J., ‘On depth semantics: definition and its motivation,’ in H. Leblanc, ed., Truth, Syntax and Modality, Amsterdam, North Holland, 1973.Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    Katz, J. J., ‘Effability and translation,’ in F. Guenthner and M. GuenthnerReutter, eds., Meaning and Translation, London, Duckworth, pp. 191–234.Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    Lakoff, G. ‘On generative semantics,’ in D. D. Steinberg and L. A. Jakobovits, eds., Semantics: An Interdisciplinary Reader in Philosophy, Linguistics and Psychology, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1971, pp. 232–296.Google Scholar
  21. [21]
    Lewis, D. K., ‘General semantics,’ in D. Davidson and G. Harman, eds., Semantics of Natural Language, Dordrecht, Reidel, 1972, pp. 169–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    Miller, G. A., and P. N. Johnson-Laird, Language and Perception, Cambridge, Mass., Belknap Press, Harvard, 1976.Google Scholar
  23. [23]
    Montague, R. M., Formal Philosophy. (ed. R. H. Thomason ), New Haven, Yale University Press, 1974.Google Scholar
  24. [24]
    Partee, B. H., ‘The semantics of belief sentences,’ in K. J. J. Hintíkka, J. M. E. Moravcsik and P. Suppes, eds., Approaches to Natural Language, Dordrecht, Reidel, 1973, pp. 309–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. [25]
    Quine, W. V., ‘Epistemology Naturalized,’ Ontological Relativity and Other Essays, New York, Columbia University Press, pp. 69–90.Google Scholar
  26. [26]
    Rescher, N., A Theory of Possibility, Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh Press, 1975.Google Scholar
  27. [27]
    Stalnaker, R. C., ‘Pragmatics,’ in D. Davidson and G. Harman, eds., Semantics of Natural Language, Dordrecht, Reidel, 1972, pp. 380–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. [28]
    Stalnaker, R. C., ‘Propositions,’ in A. F. Mackay and D. D. Merrill, eds., Issues in the Philosophy of Language, New Haven, Yale University Press, 1976, pp. 79–91.Google Scholar
  29. [29]
    Thomason, R. H., ‘Indirect discourse is not quotational,’ The Monist 60 (1977), pp. 340–354.Google Scholar
  30. [30]
    Thomason, R. H., ‘A model theory of propositional attitudes’. Linguistics and Philosophy 4 (1980), pp. 47–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. J. Cresswell

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations