Skip to main content

Abstract

Recent reports (Watkins 1968, Wahn 1970 and Gray 1972)1 have examined the impact of foreign investment on the Canadian economy and its implications for American-Canadian political and economic relations. Official reports have considered only direct investment as a problem and portfolio capital has been ignored. There is substantial foreign ownership (mostly American) in the Canadian manufacturing, resources, and mining sectors.

From Journal of World Trade Law 10 (March, April 1976): 171–176. Reprinted with permission.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Endnotes

  1. M. Watkins et al., Foreign Ownership and the Structure of Canadian Industry, Report of the Task Force on the Structure of Canadian Industry (Ottawa: The Queen’s Printer, 1968)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Wahn Report, Eleventh Report of the Standing Committee on Defence and External Affairs Respecting Canada- U. S. Relations (Ottawa: Queen’s Printer, 1970)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Government of Canada, Foreign Direct Investment in Canada (Ottawa: Information Canada, 1972). (This is often referred to as the Gray Report.) See also “A Citizen’s Guide to the Herb Gray Report,” Canadian Forum (December 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  4. The United States adopts a different definition of direct investment, based on a figure of 10 percent. The Canadian data also include cases where less than 50 percent is known to constitute control.

    Google Scholar 

  5. This might be contrasted with some of the recommendations in the Kierans Report on the mining industry in Manitoba, which advocates charging a higher rent for foreign use of resources, which under the Canadian Constitution belong to the Province, and after ten years the replacement of private mining operations by Crown Corporations. See Professor Eric Kierans, Report on Natural Resources Policy In Manitoba, Secretariat for the Planning and Priorities Committee of Cabinet, Government of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  6. For a detailed exposition of the theoretical determinants of foreign investment, see Alan M. Rugman, “Foreign Operations and the Stability of U.S. Corporate Earnings,” Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Simon Fraser University, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Also see Clarence L. Barber, “Presidential Address: A Sense of Proportion,” Canadian Journal of Economics (November 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  8. The Foreign Investment Review Act came into force in April 1974. In its first year, the Foreign Investment Review Agency and the Federal Cabinet considered eighty-two applications by foreign corporations for takeovers of Canadian companies. Of these, fifty-five were approved, eleven rejected, and sixteen were withdrawn. Another forty-four applications were pending. In addition, it has been argued that a number of potential takeovers have been discouraged as they were unlikely to provide “significant benefit” to Canada, as defined by the Review Agency. See Herb Gray, “Good Fences: Controlling Foreign Investment,” The Canadian Forum 55 (June 1975). The operations of FIRA are explored in more detail in Chapter 10.

    Google Scholar 

  9. A. E. Safarian, Foreign Ownership of Canadian Industry (Toronto: McGrawHill, Canada, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ibid., p. 267. Note that Safarian excluded very small firms from his comparison.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gideon Rosenbluth, “The Relation Between Foreign Control and Concentration in Canadian Industry,” Canadian Journal of Economics (February 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ibid., p. 19 and Table II. 11. Kari Levitt, Silent Surrender: The Multinational Corporation in Canada (Toronto: Macmillan, 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Abraham Rotstein and Gary Lax, eds., Independence: The Canadian Challenge (Toronto: Committee for an Independent Canada, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Philip Sykes, Sellout (Edmonton: Hurtig, 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  15. James Laxer, The Energy Poker Game (Toronto: New Press, 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  16. John Fayerweather, Foreign Investment in Canada (Toronto: Oxford University Press, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Alan Heisey, The Great Canadian Stampede (Toronto: Griffin House, 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  18. This Epilogue contains new materials not published in the original version.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1980 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rugman, A.M. (1980). The Foreign Ownership Debate in Canada. In: Multinationals in Canada: Theory, Performance and Economic Impact. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-7648-2_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-7648-2_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-015-7650-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-7648-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics