Skip to main content

Static and Dynamic Morality

  • Chapter
Morality in Evolution
  • 80 Accesses

Abstract

Bergsonā€™s account of moral obligation in terms of his doctrine of evolution was only the beginning of his treatment of morality. In tracing obligation back to society and beyond society to the life force itself, he was reducing it to a biological necessity, yet he was at the same time preparing the ground for the examination of a superior kind of morality and for a final explanation of all morality as originating in the ultimate creative principle of life and all its manifestations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. The Two Sources, pp. 47ā€“48 (O. 1022).

    Google ScholarĀ 

  2. Ibid., pp. 22ā€“25, 264ā€“75 (O. 1000ā€“03, 1209ā€“19).

    Google ScholarĀ 

  3. Ibid., p. 24 (O. toot).

    Google ScholarĀ 

  4. Ibid., pp. 272ā€“74 (O. 1216ā€“17). Bergson attributes this fault in human nature to the defective conditions existing on our planet, perhaps a lack of carbon, ā€œqui a contraint les hommes Ć  sā€™entredĆ©vorer.ā€ See Jacques Chevalier, Entretiens avec Bergson, p. 53.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  5. Ibid., pp. 29, 274 (O. 1006, 1218).

    Google ScholarĀ 

  6. Ibid., p. 257 (O. 1203).

    Google ScholarĀ 

  7. Ibid., pp. 47ā€“48. 255 (O. 1022, 1201ā€“02).

    Google ScholarĀ 

  8. Ibid., pp. 255ā€“56 (O. 1202 ). Static religion, like closed morality, is a product of nature and rooted in biological necessity. See Chapter II of The Two Sources which is devoted to this subject.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  9. Ibid., p. 27 (1004).

    Google ScholarĀ 

  10. Ibid., p. 86 (O. 1055ā€“56).

    Google ScholarĀ 

  11. Ibid., pp. 24ā€“25, 27ā€“28 (O. 1001ā€“02, 1004ā€“05).

    Google ScholarĀ 

  12. Ibid., pp. 25ā€“26 (O. 1003ā€“04).

    Google ScholarĀ 

  13. Ibid., p. 26 (O. 5003). Bergsonā€™s moral hero is not a moralist but an individual who sets an example. See Henri Gouhier, Bergson et le Christ des Ɖvangiles (Paris: Librairie ArthĆØme Fayard, 1961), pp. 134ā€“44. especially P. 137.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  14. Ibid., p. 31 (O. 1007ā€“08). According to Bergson intellect is incapable of directly influencing the will. We shall see the implications of this position when we come to consider the role of intellect in the moral life.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  15. Ibid., DP. 209, 252 (O. 1162, 1200 ).

    Google ScholarĀ 

  16. Jacques Chevalier, Entretiens avec Bergson, pp. 152, 155, 157, 301. Besides revealing the source of moral progress, mysticism can help us solve such problems as the existence of God, the creation of the world, and the survival of the soul. See The Two Sources, pp. 262ff (O. 1185ff) and pp. 278ff (O. 1198ff).

    Google ScholarĀ 

  17. The Two Sources, pp. 86, 89ā€“9o, 222ā€“25, 240ā€“41 (O. 1056, 1059ā€“60, 1173ā€“76, 1189ā€“90).

    Google ScholarĀ 

  18. Ibid., pp. 42ā€“46 (O. 1017ā€“20).

    Google ScholarĀ 

  19. Ibid., pp. 86ā€“87 (O. 1056).

    Google ScholarĀ 

  20. Ibid., PP. 25, 46 (O. 1002, 1021 ).

    Google ScholarĀ 

  21. Ibid., P. 74 (O. 1045 ).

    Google ScholarĀ 

  22. Ibid., p, 85 (O. 1055).

    Google ScholarĀ 

  23. Ibid., pp. 55ā€“56. 73ā€“75 (O. 1028ā€“29, 1044ā€“46).

    Google ScholarĀ 

  24. Ibid., p. 87 (O. 1056 ). See E. I. Watkin, ā€œThe Philosophy of Henri Bergson,ā€ The Dublin Review, CCIX (July, 194,), Pp. 12ā€“13.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  25. Ibid., pp. 71, 160 (O. 1042ā€“43, 1120).

    Google ScholarĀ 

  26. Ibid., p. 67 (O. 1039).

    Google ScholarĀ 

  27. Ibid., p. 64 (O. 1036).

    Google ScholarĀ 

  28. Ibid., pp. 63, 71ā€“2 (O. 1035ā€“36, 1042).

    Google ScholarĀ 

  29. Ibid., pp. 42ā€“45 (0 1018ā€“20).

    Google ScholarĀ 

  30. Ibid., Pp. 44ā€“46 (O. 1019ā€“21).

    Google ScholarĀ 

  31. Ibid., p. 86 (O. 3056). See also pp. 202, 257 (O. 1156, 1203 ).

    Google ScholarĀ 

  32. Ibid., pp. 209, 252 (O. I162, 1200).

    Google ScholarĀ 

  33. Ibid., p. 86 (O. 1056).

    Google ScholarĀ 

  34. Ibid., pp. 86ā€“87, 223ā€“25 (O. 1057, 1174ā€“76).

    Google ScholarĀ 

  35. Ibid., p. 222 (O. 1173).

    Google ScholarĀ 

  36. Ibid., p. 243 (O. 1192 ). Bergson tells us that he is going beyond Creative Evolution here. Ibid., P. 244 (O. 1193).

    Google ScholarĀ 

  37. Creative Evolution, D. 248 (O. 706); The Two Sources pp. 244ā€“46 (O. 1193ā€“94).

    Google ScholarĀ 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

Ā© 1970 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gallagher, I.J. (1970). Static and Dynamic Morality. In: Morality in Evolution. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-7573-7_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-7573-7_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-017-0034-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-7573-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics