Skip to main content
  • 32 Accesses

Abstract

Schopenhauer’s Parerga and Paralipomena reveals a distinct simi­larity with the content of Lichtenberg’s first and second volumes of the Vermischte Schriften, the various editions of which Schopen­hauer referred to in his discussion of Lichtenberg.2 It is the function of this transitional chapter to point out some of the ideas concerning education that Schopenhauer shared — if only in part — with Lichten­berg.

Man’s theoretical knowledge, unless it becomes practical, is like a blooming rose that delights others by its color and fragrance, but nevertheless, decays — without producing any fruits or results.1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Schopenhauer, op. cit., V, p. 685.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ibid, V, p. 595.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ibid, V, p. 27.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ibid, V, pp. 527–28. Herder is, parenthetically, referred to as a sophist!

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ibid, V, p. 595. Cf. Trachsler’s categorization: “Lichtenberg ist weder Dichter noch Philosoph.”, op. cit., p. 31.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ibid, V, pp. 643-44. B. Russell, almost a century later, wrote: “One result of the work we have been considering is to dethrone mathematics from the lofty place that it has occupied since Pythagoras and Plato,ö,” A History of Western Philosophy (New York, 1945), p. 831.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ibid, IV, p. 128. Cf. VS, I, pp. 53, 55, 84, 85.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ibid, IV, p. 221. Cf. VS, I, pp. 56, 57.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ibid, IV, p. 200. The acme of terminological confusion is reached, according to Schopenhauer, in Hegel’s infamous definition of “Natur” - which he defined as “die Idee in ihrem Andersein.”, Ibid, IV, p. 203.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ibid, V, p. 528. Cf. VS, I, p. 81.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ibid, V, p. 386. See also IV, p. 213; Cf. VS, I, p. 70.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ibid, V, p. 302.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ibid, V, p. 303. Cf. VS, VI, pp. 48-49; B. and. F., p. 235.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ibid, IV, p. 262. Cf. VS, I, p. 123; VS, IV, p. 56.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ibid, IV, p. 298. Other “real” philosophers were, according to Schopenhauer: Plato, Descartes, Hume, Locke, Spinoza. Ibid, IV, p. 191. Said Josef Rattner: “Immanuel Kants öusserung jedoch, dass er eine ”kopernikanische Wendung“ in der Philosophie veranlasst habe, eine völlige Neuorientierung, deren hohe Bedeutung seiner Meinung nach erst hundert Jahre nach ihm geböhrend gewördigt werden könne, wird man röckhaltlos beipflichten können.”, Grosse Pödagogen (Mönchen, 1956), p. 75.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Schopenhauer’s stress on the necessity of learning the classical languages, especially Greek, was not fully shared, however, (as was pointed out in the chapter on Curriculum) by Lichtenberg.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Schopenhauer, op. cit., V, p. 521. See also Schopenhauer, op. cit., V, pp. 507, 512, 520, and IV, p. 165.

    Google Scholar 

  18. . VS., I, p. 221.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Schopenhauer, op. cit., V, p. 521.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ibid, V, p. 522. Cf. VS, I, pp. 155, 171, 219, 221.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ibid, V, p. 585. Cf. VS, I, p. 120.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ibid, V, p. 591. Cf. VS, I, p. 55.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ibid, V, p. 514.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ibid, V, p. 666.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ibid, V, p. 667. Cf. VS, I, p. 224; Werke, I, p. 420.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ibid, V, p. 665. Cf. VS, II, p. 154. The teaching of Christianity at university level would mean, Schopenhauer maintained, the “editing of Jewish mythology as philosophy.”, Ibid, IV, p. 168.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ibid, V, p. 665. Cf. VS, I, P. 94.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ibid, V, p. 517. This is another instance where Schopenhauer stressed the importance of a differentiated curriculum. Cf. VS, I, pp. 46–47.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Ibid, V, p. 339. Cf. VS, I, p. 199.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Ibid, V, p. 340. Lichtenberg observed that, when metaphysics or religion was taught to young students, the outcome of such instruction inevitably led the students to believe in the immortality of the soul., VS, I, p. 59

    Google Scholar 

  31. VS, I, p. 58.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Ibid, I, p. 234. Schopenhauer’s revelation in regard to a masterpiece of a “Christian” fraud is here, it seems, pertinent. Wrote Schopenhauer: “Sieh” z.B. nach England, wo dreister Pfaffentrug den, von Konstantin dem Grossen, in Opposition zum Judensabbath, eingesetzten christlichen Sonntag dennoch lögenhafterweise mit jenem, sogar dem Namen nach, identifizirt, um Jehovah’s Satzungen för den Sabbath, d.h. den Tag, da die von sechstögiger Arbeit ermödete Allmacht sich ausruhen musste, weshalb er wesentlich der letzte Tag der Woche ist, zu öbertragen auf den Sonntag der Christen, den diem solis, diesen ersten, die Woche glorreich eröffnenden Tag, diesen Tag der Andacht und Freude.“, V, p. 371.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Schopenhauer, op. cit., IV, p. 152.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Ibid, IV, p. 123. Cf. VS, I, pp.12, 57, 81, and Voltaire, op. cit., p. 443. Cf. also VS, I, 54, 57.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Ibid, V, pp. 27–28. It is noteworthy that the basic purpose of Göttingisches Magazine und Literatur, as announced by Dieterich, was to promote “knowledge of nature and of man, physics, natural history and philosophy, physiognomy - pro and con -, historyö” F. Lauchert, G. Chr. Lichtenberg’s schriftstellerische Thötigkeit in chronologischer Uebersicht dargestellt. Mit Nachtrögen zu Lichtenberg’s “Vermischten Schriften” und textkritischen Berichtigungen (Göttingen, 1893), p. 44. Schopenhauer had no use for Herbart’s philosophical writings either, op. cit., V, p. 209.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Ibid, V, p. 525.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1963 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Øksenholt, S. (1963). Schopenhauer and Education. In: Thoughts Concerning Education in the Works of Georg Christoph Lichtenberg. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-7528-7_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-7528-7_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-017-0008-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-7528-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics