Skip to main content

Natural Language Motivations for Extending Categorial Grammar

  • Chapter
Categorial Grammars and Natural Language Structures

Part of the book series: Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy ((SLAP,volume 32))

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to present a variety of linguistically significant generalizations that can naturally be represented within a specific version of categorial grammar we propose below. These generalizations are given in Sections 2–4. Section 1 introduces the specific form of categorial grammar we use, and Section 5 concludes with a tentative suggestion for a formal universal of natural language based on the empirically motivated work of the preceding sections.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bach, E.: 1979, ‘Control in Montague Grammar’, Linguistic Inquiry 10, 515–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bar-Hillel, Y., C. Gaifman, and E. Shamir: 1964, ‘On Categorial and Phrase Structure

    Google Scholar 

  • Grammars’, in Y. Bar-Hillel, Language and Information,Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass., pp. 99–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N.: 1977, ‘On WH-Movement’, in Peter W. Culicover, Thomas Wasow, and Adrian Akmajian (eds.), Formal Syntax, Academic Press, New York, pp. 71–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowty, D.: 1982a, ‘Grammatical Relations and Montague Grammar’, in P. Jacobson and G. K. Pullum (eds.), The Nature of Syntactic Representation, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 79–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowty, D.: 1982b, ‘More on the Categorial Analysis of Grammatical Relations’, in A. Zaenen (ed.), Subjects and Other Subjects: Proceedings from the Harvard Conference on the Representation of Grammatical Relations, Indiana Linguistics Club, Bloomington, Ind., pp. 115–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gary, J. 0.: 1977, ‘Implications for Universal Grammar of Object-Creating Rules in Luyia and Mashi’, Studies in African Linguistics, Supplement 7, pp. 85–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodges, K. S.: 1977, ‘Causatives, Transitivity, and Objecthood in Kimeru’, Studies in African Linguistics, Supplement 7, pp. 113–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keenan, E. L.: 1980, ‘Passive is Phrasal (not Sentential or Lexical)’, in T. Hoekstra et al. (eds.), Lexical Grammar, Foris, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keenan, E. L.: 1982, ‘Parametric Variation in Universal Grammar’, in R. Dirven and G. Radden (eds.), Issues in the Theory of Universal Grammar, Gunter Narr, Tübingen, pp. 11–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keenan, E. L. and L. Faltz: 1985, Boolean Semantics for Natural Language, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keenan, E. L. and A. Timberlake: 1985, ‘Predicate Formation Rules in Universal Grammar’, in M. Wescoat et al. (eds.), Proceedings of the Fourth West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, Stanford Linguistics Association, Stanford, Calif.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keenan, E. L.: 1986, Polyvalency and Domain Theory’, ms.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimenyi, A.: 1978, A Relational Grammar of Kinyarwanda, University of California, Berkeley, Calif.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G. and S. Peters: 1969, ‘Phrasal Conjunction and Symmetric Predicates’, in David A. Reidel and Sanford A. Schane (eds.), Modern Studies in English, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., pp. 113–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montague, R.: 1969, ‘English as a Formal Language’, in B. Visenti et al. (eds.), Lin- guaggi nella Societa e nella Tecnica, Edizioni di Communita, Milan, pp. 99–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montague, R.: 1973, ‘The Proper Treatment of Quantification in Ordinary English’, in J. Hintikka, J. Moravcsik, and P. Suppes (eds.), Approaches to Natural Language, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 221–42.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T.: 1979, ‘Type Theory and Ordinary Language’, in S. Davis and Marianne Mithun (eds.), Linguistics, Philosophy, and Montague Grammar, University of Texas, Austin, Texas, pp. 127–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Partee, B. H.: 1985, ‘Syntactic Categories and Semantic Types’, presented at Categorial Grammars and Natural Language Structures Conference, May 31—June 2, Tucson, Arizona.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1988 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Keenan, E.L., Timberlake, A. (1988). Natural Language Motivations for Extending Categorial Grammar. In: Oehrle, R.T., Bach, E., Wheeler, D. (eds) Categorial Grammars and Natural Language Structures. Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy, vol 32. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-6878-4_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-6878-4_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-55608-031-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-6878-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics