Sequence Stratigraphic Analysis of Upper Turonian and Coniacian Strata in the San Juan Basin, New Mexico, U.S.A.

  • Dag Nummedal
Part of the NATO ASI Series book series (ASIC, volume 304)


This paper derives the absolute sea level history for the Late Turonian and Coniacian strata in the San Juan Basin of New Mexico. The sea level history is deduced from (a) the degree of aggradation versus progradation of coastal sandbodies, (b) paleoenvironmental interpretation of the successive depositional systems tracts, (c) location and extent of basin-margin subaerial unconformities, (d) location and extent of marine condensed sections and their associated hiatuses and (e) the presence of distinctive transgressive surfaces. Dates are assigned to this sea level history based on well-established ammonite and inoceramid zonations for the western interior and the absolute time scale of Haq and co-workers.

The analysis applies sequence stratigraphic concepts and principles to the interpretation of a set of shallow marine, clastic-dominated depositional systems and their bounding surfaces. The following systems tracts are clearly discriminated by the paleoenvironmental analysis: highstand (early and late), lowstand (early and late), and transgressive. In addition, the subaerial unconformity (sequence boundary) and the submarine condensed section with its associated hiatus are readily differentiated based on the appearance of the surfaces themselves and the associated lithofacies characteristics.

The inferred history of deposition and sea level change is as follows. A sequence boundary is located at the base of the Late Turonian Juana Lopez Member of the Mancos Shale (90 Ma). This probably corresponds to a period of rapid eustatic fall. The subsequent episode of maximum flooding occurred about 0.5 Ma later and was followed by aggradation of Gallup Sandstone Tongues F, E, and D in the early highstand systems tract. Gallup Sandstone Tongue C prograded during late highstand and early lowstand. A depositional sequence boundary forms an unconformity on top of the landward part of the Gallup C-Tongue and a conformity at its seaward base. This boundary is dated as Early Coniacian (89 Ma). A slow transgression occurred during most of the Coniacian attaining maximum landward flooding of the overlying Mulatto Shale Tongue at the end of Coniacian age (88 Ma).


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Armstrong, R. L. (1968) “Sevier orogenic belt in Nevada and Utah”, Bull. Geol. Soc. Am. 79, 429–458.Google Scholar
  2. Brown, L. F., Jr., and Fisher, W. L. (1977) “Seismic-stratigraphic interpretation of depositional systems: Examples from Brazilian rift and pull-apart basins”, in C. E. Payton (ed.), Seismic Stratigraphy–Applications to Hydrocarbon Exploration, Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geologists Mem. 26, pp. 213–248.Google Scholar
  3. Cobban, W. A. (1984) “Mid-Cretaceous ammonite zones, Western Interior, United States”, Bull. Geol. Soc. Denmark 33, 71–89.Google Scholar
  4. Cross, T. A. (1986) “Tectonic controls of foreland basin subsidence and Laramide style deformation, western United States”, in P. A. Allen and P. Homewood (eds.), Foreland Basins, Internat. Assoc. Sedimentol. Special Publication 8, 15–39.Google Scholar
  5. Dickinson, W. R. (1976) “Sedimentary basins developed during evolution of Mesozoic-Cenozoic arc-trench systems in western North America”, Can. Jour. Earth Science 13, 1268–1287.Google Scholar
  6. Haq, B. U., Hardenbol, J. and Vail, P. R. (1987) “Chronology of fluctuating sea levels since the Triassic”, Science, 235, 1156–1166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hook, S. C. and Cobban, W. A. (1980) “Reinterpretation of type section of Juana Lopez Member of Mancos Shale”, New Mexico Geology 2, 17–22.Google Scholar
  8. Kauffman, E. G. et al. (12 co-authors) (1985) “A field guide to the stratigraphy, geochemistry, and depositional environments of the Kiowa-Skull Creek, Greenhorn, and Niobrara marine cycles in the Pueblo-Canon City area, Colorado”, in L. M. Pratt, E. G. Kauffman, F. B. Zelt (eds.), Fine-Grained Deposits and Biofacies of the Cretaceous Western Interior Seaway: Evidence of Cyclic Sedimentary Processes, SEPM Field Trip Guiandbook no. 4, 1985 Midyear Meeting, Golden, CO, pp. FRS-1–26.Google Scholar
  9. Mitchum, R. M., Vail, P. R., and Thompson, S. (1977) “The depositional sequence as a basic unit for stratigraphic analysis”, in C. E. Payton (ed.), Seismic Stratigraphy-Applications to rlydrocarbon Accumulation, Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geologists Mem. 26, pp. 53–62.Google Scholar
  10. Molenaar, C. M. (1973), “Sedimentary facies and correlation of the Gallup Sandstone and associated formations, northwestern New Mexico”, in J. E. Fassett (ed.), Cretaceous and Tertiary Rocks of the southern Colorado Plateau, Four Corners Geological Society Memoir, pp. 85–110.Google Scholar
  11. Molenaar, C. M. (1983a) “Major depositional cycles and regional correlations of Upper Cretaceous rocks, Southern Colorado Plateau and adjacent areas”, in M. W. Reynolds and E. D. Dolly (eds.), Mesozoic Paleogeography of West-Central United States, Rocky Mountain Sec. Soc. Econ. Paleont. Mineral., pp. 201–224.Google Scholar
  12. Molenaar, C. M. (1983b) “Principal reference section and correlation of Gallup Sandstone, northwestern New Mexico”, in S. C. Hook (comp.), Contributions to Mid-Cretaceous Paleontology and Stratigraphy of New Mexico, New Mexico Bureau of Mines and Mineral Resources Circ. 185, pp. 29–40.Google Scholar
  13. Nummedal, D., and Swift D. J. P. (1987) “Transgressive stratigraphy of sequence-bounding unconformities–some principles derived from Holocene and Cretaceous examples”, in D. Nummedal, O. H. Pilkey, and J. D. Howard (eds.), Sea Level Fluctuation and Coastal Evolution, Soc. Econ. Paleont. Mineral. Spec. Publ. 41, pp. 242–260.Google Scholar
  14. Nummedal, D., Wright, R., Swift, D. J. P., Tillman R. W. and Wolter, N. R. (1989) “Depositional systems architecture of shallow marine sequences”, in D. Nummedal and R. R. Remy (eds.), Cretaceous Shelf Sandstones and Shelf Depositional Sequences, Western Interior Basin, Utah, Colorado and New Mexico, International Geological Congress, Guidebook to Field Trip T 119, American Geophysical Union, Ch. 4, pp. 35–80.Google Scholar
  15. Snedden, J. W., Nummedal, D. and Amos, A. F. (1988) “Storm-and fair-weather combined flow on the central Texas shelf”, Jour. Sed. Petrol. 58, 580–595.Google Scholar
  16. Tillman, R. W. (1985) “The Tocito and Gallup Sandstones, New Mexico, a comparison”, in R. W. Tillman, D. J. P. Swift, and R. G. Walker (eds.), Shelf Sands and Sandstone Reservoirs, Soc. Econ. Paleont. Mineral. Short Course Notes #13, pp. 403–463.Google Scholar
  17. Vail, P. R. (1987), “Seismic stratigraphy interpretation procedure”, in A. W. Bally, (ed.), Atlas of Seismic Stratigraphy, Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geologists Studies in Geology 27, pp. 11–14.Google Scholar
  18. Weimer, R. J. (1984) “Relation of unconformities, tectonics and sea-level changes, Cretaceous Western Interior, U.S.A.”, in J. S. Schlee (ed.), Interregional Unconformities and Hydrocarbon Accumulation, Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geologists Mem. 36, pp. 7–35.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dag Nummedal
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Geology and GeophysicsLouisiana State UniversityBaton RougeUSA

Personalised recommendations