Abstract
The classification adopted in this revision proceeds in a general way from simpler and less highly differentiated to more complex and more highly differentiated forms. In A. bancanum, for example, which comes near the beginning of the series, the leaves and under-leaves are composed of a relatively small number of cells and are undivided. In A. inaequilaterum, on the other hand, which comes near the end of the series, the leaves and underleaves are composed of a relatively large number of cells, the leaves are definitely bifid, and the underleaves definitely trifid. A higher differentiation is further expressed by the marginal teeth of the leaves and underleaves and by the frequent occurrence of cuticular tubercles.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1934 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Evans, A.W. (1934). Phylogeny and Affinities of Acromastigum. In: A Revision of the Genus Acromastigum. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-3499-4_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-3499-4_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-015-2258-8
Online ISBN: 978-94-015-3499-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive