Abstract
‘No one can remain entirely free from the spirit of the time in which he lives’,2 Grillparzer observed about 1825 and writing in 1840 he stated: ‘Who could or would always want to forget the present entirely?’3 The nineteenth century then, in which the poet lived, had a strong impact upon his personality and his art. Generally he maintained a rather negative outlook on the efforts of his own time, whether they were in the realm of politics, art or philosophy, and yet he himself in many ways, though never without originality, seemed to reflect specific attitudes of the era he scorned. But the bonds which link the poet with his own time and impress themselves so characteristically upon his dramas do not have the uplifting effects of the classical heritage, they rather constitute the unresolved element of human and personal tragedy that runs through his life and caused him so much doubt, despair and depression about his work and existence. Where the humanism of Goethe, the restraint of Mozart and the critical analysis of Kant had reinforced his own search for order and design that offered a possibility of contentment, the currents of his own time, the trend toward introspection, determinism and speculation tended to arouse an emotional chaos he desperately tried to control.
La raison sans les passions, serait presque un roi sans sujets.
Diderot 1
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Quoted by Grillparzer, W II, 12, p. 7.
W I, 14, p. 41.
W II, 10, p. 308.
Cysarz, H., Von Schiller zu Nietzsche, Halle, 1928, p. 4.
W I, 16, p. 135.
G VI, p. 272.
G III, p. 155.
1. 215 ff.
W I, 16, p. 138.
Ibid.
Ibid. Several critics noted how Grillparzer in this respect echoed the ‘Weltschmerz’ and the loneliness of the nineteenth century. See Farinelli, A., Grillparzer und Lope de Vega, Berlin, 1894, p. 121 and Wilhelm von Hartel, Jb. XVII, p. 170. Joachim Müller in his study ‘Grillparzers Menschenauffassung’, in Literatur und Leben, 4. Bd., Weimar, 1934, p. 150, observed further that the experience of loneliness in human life seemed to be reserved for the nineteenth century and that the poets of this age re-created in their dramas the tragedy of individuation. Grillparzer’s isolation thus can perhaps be attributed not only to his classical views, but must also be considered as a reflection of the general spiritual climate of his day, when the isolation of the individual and the tragedy of individualism became particularly acute problems for the artist.
W II, 8, p. 195.
W II, 8, p. 107.
W II, 8, p. 108.
W I, 14, p. 170.
Sauer, A., Grillparzers sämtliche Werke, Stuttgart, 1892, v. I, p. 32.
W II, 7, p. 128.
W II, 8, p. 328.
W I, 14, p. 109.
Jb. X, Rud. Payer v. Thurn, p. 109.
Ibid., p. 105 ff.
Williamson, E. J., Grillparzer’s Attitude toward Romanticism, Chicago, 1910.
W I, 12/1, p. 278.
W I, 14, p. 28.
G IV, p. 241.
W II, 7, p. 17 f.
W I, 1, p. XLII.
W II, 7, p. 6.
Ibid.
W I, 14, p. 158.
W II, 7, p. 22.
G VI, p. 272.
W II, 10, p. 179.
Writers of the Western World, Ed. by Addison Hibbard, Houghton Mifflin Co., New York, 1942, p. XI.
Ibid., p. XI.
W II, 10, p. 323.
Ibid.
W II, 10. p. 100.
W II, 10, p. 144.
W II, 11, p. 260.
W II, 11, p. 269.
W II, 11, p. 96.
Rollett, Edwin, and Sauer, August, Franz Grillparzer Gesammelte Werke, Wien, 1925, v. I, p. XVII.
W II, 9, p. 66.
W II, 10, p. 144.
Ibid.
W I, 14, p. 108.
Ibid.
W II, 12, p. 61.
W II, 10, p. 290.
W II, 8, p. 300.
W II, 11, p. 273.
W II, 11, p. 252.
W II, 11, p. 268.
W II, 8, p. 59.
G IV, p. 199.
W II, 11, p. 248.
W I, 16, p. 184.
W II, 9, p. 354.
W II, 9, p. 111.
W II, 12, p. 69.
W II, 11, p. 131.
W I, 14, p. 109.
W II, 9, p. 158.
W II, 10, p. 140.
W I, 12/1, p. 84.
W II, 8, p. 289.
W II, 11, p. 240.
W II, 9, p. 310.
W II, 9, p. 137.
W II, 7, p. 234.
W II, 7, p. 329.
W II, 10, p. 154.
W II, 11, p. 88.
W II, 8, p. 42.
Meyer, Th. A., ‘Franz Grillparzer und die Ursachen seiner langen Verkennung’, in Neue Jahrbücher für das klassische Altertum, Geschichte und Deutsche Literatur, 1903, I. Abt., XI Bd., 6. Heft, p. 429.
W II, 9, p. 157.
Bietak, W., Das Lebensgefühl des ‘Biedermeier’ in der österreichischen Dichtung, Wien & Leipzig, 1931, p. 13.
W II, 7, p. 271.
W II, 10, p. 187.
Meyer, Th., op. cit., p. 425.
Grigorovitza, E., Libussa in der deutschen Literatur, Berlin, 1901, p. 76.
Meyer, Th., op. cit., p. 425.
W II, 10, p. 194, also p. 241, and p. 318.
G I, p. 256. Betty Paoli here reports the following remark of Grillparzer: ‘My plays’, he said, ‘have cost me little trouble. The characters stood physically before me, I actually saw them; I did not make them speak: they spoke to me and all I needed to do was to write down their words.’ And in W I, 14, p. 93 in a brief sketch entitled ‘Ferdinand Raimund’ we find the following statement: ‘The true dramatic poet sees the performance of his work while he is writing.’
Mann, Th., ‘Huldigung für Grillparzer’, Neue Freie Presse, 22. Jänner 1922.
G I, p. 39.
W II, 7, p. 101.
Scherer, W., ‘Franz Grillparzer’, in Vorträge und A ufsätze zur Geschichte des geistigen Lebens in Deutschland und Österreich, Berlin, 1874, p. 198.
W II, 10, p. 178.
W I, 16, p. 343.
Redlich, O., ‘Grillparzer und die Wissenschaft’, in Österreichische Bücherei, Nr. 1, Wien und Leipzig, no date, p. 28.
Meyer, Th., op. cit., p. 425.
W II, 11, p. 132.
Cysarz, op. cit., p. 19.
Ibid., p. 154.
Meyer, Th., op. cit., p. 425.
W II, 7, p. 299.
W II, 9, p. 302.
Scherer, op. cit., p. 303.
W II, 11, p. 197.
W II, 10, p. 229.
W II, 10, p. 189.
W II, 11, p. 195 f.
W II, 10, p. 202.
W II, 10, p. 282.
W II, 9, p. 167.
W II, 11, p. 110.
W II, 11, p. 177.
W II, 9, p. 138.
W II, 10, p. 230.
Scherer, op. cit., p. 303.
G IV, p. 227.
W I, 14, p. 162.
W I, 14, p. 163 f.
W II, 11, p. 217.
W I, 14, p. 168.
W I, 14, p. 81.
W I, 14, p. 116.
W I, 14, p. 96.
W I, 14, p. 98.
W II, 8, p. 58.
W I, 14, p. 38; see also G II, p. 285 for Grillparzer’s remark to Beethoven: ‘Die Welt hat ihre Unschuld verloren, und ohne Unschuld schafft und geniesst man kein Kunstwerk.’
W I, 14, p. 98.
Ibid.
W I, 14, p. 31.
Ibid.
Kaufmann, F. W., ‘Grillparzer’s Relation to Classical Idealism’, in Modern Language Notes, 1936, v. 51, no. 6, p. 361.
Ibid.
Ibid., p. 363.
Ibid., p. 362.
Reich, E., Franz Grillparzers Dramen, Dresden, 1909, pp. 25, 100, 173; see also Klaar, A., Grillparzer als Dramatiker, Wien, 1891, p. 26.
Reich, op. cit., p. 8 f.
Ibid., p. 306.
W II, 9, p. 301.
Ibid.
Reich, op. cit., p. 306.
Volkelt, J., Franz Grillparzer als Dichter des Tragischen, München, 1909, p. 193.
Ibid., p. 37.
Ibid., p. 188.
Roselieb, Hans, ‘Grillparzers Weltanschauung’, in Grillparzer-Studien, Ed. by O. Katann, Wien, 1924, p. 40 ff.
W III, 2, p. 244.
G I, p. 246.
G I, p. 261.
Cysarz, op. cit., p. 127.
Volkelt, op. cit., p. 191.
Cysarz, op. cit., p. 118.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1955 Martinus Nijhoff, The Haque, Netherlands
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Stein, G. (1955). Grillparzer and the Nineteenth Century. In: The Inspiration Motif in the Works of Franz Grillparzer. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-3171-9_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-3171-9_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-015-1996-0
Online ISBN: 978-94-015-3171-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive