Skip to main content

Minor Painters, Some Mosaicists and “Madonneri”

  • Chapter
The Development of the Italian Schools of Painting
  • 91 Accesses

Abstract

In Venice, as in many centres where the art of painting reached a high standard, there was a group of craftsmen who satisfied the requirements of the more modest classes of society and frequently also those of the inhabitants of the small towns in the Veneto.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Reference

  1. Ludwig u. Paoletti,Repert. f. Kunstwiss., XXII, 1899, pp. 271, 444• Crowe and Cavalcaselle, op cit., III, p. 436 note 1.

    Google Scholar 

  2. L. Testi, Storia della Pitt. Venez., pp. 512, 554, 723.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Thieme-Becker,Künstlerlexikon, IV, p. 241.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ludwig u. Paoletti, op. cit., give the date as 1486. Testi, op. cit., as 1478.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ludwig e Molmenti, op. cit., suppose that the mysterious word “Bnect” might be a restorer’s deformation of “Venecti”.

    Google Scholar 

  6. P. Paoletti, Archit. e scult. nel Rinasc. in Venezia, Venice, 1893, p. 67. Testi, op. cit., II, p. 543.

    Google Scholar 

  7. It led Testi,op. cit., and others to believe that the frescoes in the apsidal vault of the chapel, now known to be by Andrea del Castagno, and Francesco da Faenza, were the work of these painters. Fiocco,L’arte di Andrea Mantegna, Bologna, 1927, p. 65 et seq. See also Vol. X, p. 339.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Testi,op. cit., II, p. 551.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Reprod. in. Repert. f. Kunstwiss., XVII, p. 267.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Crico, Lettere sulle belle arte trevigiane, p. 251. Crowe and Caval-caselle, op. cit., I, p. 76. M. Ca/fi, A. d. M., Arch. Venet., XXIII, 1887, p. 331.

    Google Scholar 

  11. The Same, Bibliofilo, VIII, p. 71. Cecchetti,idem, p. 397.

    Google Scholar 

  12. A. della Rovere, Arte e Storia, VI, No. 33. Ludwig u. Paoletti, op. cit., Repert. f. Kunstwiss., XVII, p. 267; XXII, p. 448.

    Google Scholar 

  13. G. Fogolari, Thieme-Becker, Künstlerlexikon, I, p. 460. Chiuppani, Bollettino del Museo Civico di Bassano, III, 1906, p. 71. Testi, op. cit., II, p. 531.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Moschini,Guida per l’Isola di Murano, 1808, p. 122.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Testi,op. cit., gives all the dates.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Berenson,Venetian Painting in America, p. 64. A considerable number of pictures has been attributed without any reason to Andrea or to him in collaboration with Bartolomeo Vivarini, v. Testi, loc cit. and Fogolari,op. cit. To the combined efforts of the two artists are ascribed: the polyptych, now generally believed to be by Giambellino, in SS. Giovanni e Paolo and the four triptychs from the Carità church, likewise early works by Giovanni Bellini (Paoletti) A Resurrection, with the false signature Andre De Mura… 1446(?),was at one time exhibited in the gallery of Venice, but it has been taken away. Andrea has also been held responsible for the Madonna with SS. Peter and Paul in the sacristy of S. Niccolô in Treviso and for the Saviour between SS. Augustine and Francis in the Accademia of Venice (614, 620, 622), which have been ascribed to Bartolomeo as well, but which are now correctly classified as productions of the Paduan school. Of the lost works, besides the altar-piece executed in collaboration with Bartolomeo for the Scuola Grande di S. Marco, there was, according to Vinc. Zanetti,Guida di Murano, a picture by Andrea in Sta. Chiara, Murano, while Moschini,Guida per]’Isola di Murano, p. 122, tells us that in some notes of Cay. De Lazaro there is mention of a signed Madonna in a private house (Testi,p. 540). I have already referred to the mistakes made by Testi and others regarding the frescoes by Castagna and Francesco da Faenza in the S. Tarasio chapel, which they thought had been executed by Andrea da Murano, Bagnolo, etc.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Testi, op. cit., II, p. 87, with bibliography.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lanzi,ed. 1795–1798 II, p. 23, finds that the work deserves more praise on account of its colours than for its design.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ludwig, op cit., XXVI, p. 8. Crowe and Cavalcaselle, op cit., III, P. 331•

    Google Scholar 

  20. The documents are given by Graselli,Abecedario biografico dei pittori cremonesi etc., Milan, 1827, p. 242. The frescoes, which were afterwards white-washed, are described by R. de Soresina Vidoni,La pittura cremonese descritta, Milan, 1824, p. 124.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Moschini, op cit., I, p. 287. Vidoni, loc cit., after Stringa’s edition of Sansovino.

    Google Scholar 

  22. The subjects are described in Crowe and Cavalcaselle,loc. cit.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Reprod. Gronau,Bellini, fig. 117, and in Vol. XVII, fig. 219; v. also P. 371•

    Google Scholar 

  24. G. Frizzoni,Le Gallerie etc. in Bergamo, p. 36 and fig. 64.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Crowe and Cavalcaselle,German edit., VI, p. 488 note 214; English edit., Borenius, III, p. 312, note 2.

    Google Scholar 

  26. The documents are published by Ludwig, op cit., p. 108. Lanni and Federici mention the painting as a self-portrait by Carpaccio. Reprod. in Ludwig e Molmenti,Carpaccio, p. 49.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Modigliani,in Thieme-Becker, Künstlerlexikon, wrongly quotes Baruf faldi,Vite de’ pittori e scultori ferraresi, II, p. 585, where there is no mention of Antonio da Venezia.

    Google Scholar 

  28. B. Cechetti, Archiv. Venet., XXXIII, 1887, p. 204; XXXIV, 1880, P. 400.

    Google Scholar 

  29. P. Saccardo, Les mosaïques de St. Marc à Venise, 1897, pp. 32–44, 246, 248, 254, 263, 276, 284, 287.

    Google Scholar 

  30. The same in Italian: La Basilica di S. Marco etc. sotto la direzione di C.Boito, I, Venice, 1888, p. 306 et seq.

    Google Scholar 

  31. G. Fiocco, Il rinnovamento toscano dell’arte del mosaico a Venezia, Dedalo, VI1, 1925–26, p. 109.

    Google Scholar 

  32. The Same, L’arte di Andrea Mantegna, Bologna, 1927, pp. 33, 86 and Rivista d’Arte, XVII, 1935, p. 402. G. Ludwig, Archiv. Beitrage zur Gesch. der Venez. Kunst, Berlin, 1911, p. 151. See also Vol. X, p. 380.

    Google Scholar 

  33. For Veneto-Byzantine painting v. S. Bettini,La pittura di icone cretese-veneziana e i Madonneri, Padua, 1833. Also O. Wulff u. M. Alpatof f,Denkmäler der Ikonenmalerei, Hellerau, 1925, p. 219. Ph. Schweinfurth,Gesch. der Russischen Malerei, The Hague, 1930, pp. 354–452 (more especially p. 397).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Bettini, op cit., pl. 4, reproduces one in the Rampazzo collection, Padua. There exists quite a number of similar Madonnas of equally good quality.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1936 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Van Marle, R. (1936). Minor Painters, Some Mosaicists and “Madonneri”. In: The Development of the Italian Schools of Painting. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-2815-3_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-2815-3_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-015-1674-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-2815-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics