Advertisement

A critical review of natural family planning studies

  • J. M. Spieler

Abstract

Periodic abstinence, rhythm and natural family planning are terms often used synonymously to describe fertility regulating methods based on the cyclic pattern of fertile and infertile phases during the menstrual cycle. Rhythm traditionally refers to the use of calendar calculations, developed by Ogino and Knaus, based on the lengths of previous menstrual cycles to estimate the days of the fertile phase. Although many couples continue to rely solely on such calculations they do so either because they have been found to be useful in their own situations or because they or their instructors are not aware of the newer methods based on periodic abstinence. It should be noted, however, that the calendar rhythm method has never been subjected to prospective clinical study using a well-developed protocol and subject selection criteria which minimize the chance of method failures resulting from very wide intra-woman variations in the cycle lengths. For example, using the selection criteria established for the WHO multicentre study of the ovulation method12 it would not be surprising to find a theoretical effectiveness rate for the calendar method of 90–95%

Keywords

Family Planning Menstrual Cycle Cervical Mucus Fertile Period Prospective Multicentre Trial 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    WHO Task Force on Methods for the Determination of the Fertile Period (1981). A prospective multicentre trial of the ovulation method. I. The teaching phase. Fertil. Steril., 36, 152Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    WHO Task Force on Methods for the Determination of the Fertile Period (1981). A prospective multicentre trial of the ovulation method. II. The effectiveness phase. Fertil. Steril., 36, 591Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Uricchio, W. and Williams, M. K. (1973). Proceedings of a Research Conference on Natural Family Planning. ( Washington, D.C.: The Human Life Foundation )Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Liskin, L. (1981). Periodic abstinence: How well do new approaches work? Pop. Rep, Series I, No. 3Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Population Crisis Committee (1981). Natural family planning: Periodic abstinence as a method of fertility control. Population, 11Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Klaus, H. (1982). Natural family planning: A review. Obstet. Gynecol. Survey, 37 (Suppl.), 128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kleinman, R. (1983). Periodic Abstinence for Family planning. ( London: IPPF medical publications )Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Spieler, J. (1981). Self-detection of ovulation and the fertile period. In Cortes-Prieto, J., Campos de Paz, A. and Neves-e-Castro, M. (eds.) Research on Fertility and Sterility, pp. 35–51. ( Lancaster: MTP Press )Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ross, C. and Piotrow, P. (1974). Birth control without contraceptives. Pop. Rep., Series I, No. 1Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bureau for Program and Policy Coordination (1982). A.I.D. policy paper: Population Assistance, p. 7. ( U.S. Agency for International Development )Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Department of Health, Dublin, Ireland (1979). International Seminar on Natural Family Planning. ( Dublin: Cahill Printers )Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gross, P. (1979). NFP as an appropriate health technology: Towards an agenda for global research and development. Int. Rev. Nat. Fam. Plann., 3, 279Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Brennan, J. and Klaus, H. (1982). Terminology and core curricula in natural family planning. Fertil. Steril., 38, 117PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hilgers, T., Prebil, A. and Daly, K. (1980). The effectiveness of the ovulation method as a means of achieving and avoiding pregnancy. Presented at the Education Phase III, Continuing Education Conference for Natural Family Planning Practitioners, July 24, OmahaGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Weissman, M., Foliaki, L., Billings, E. and Billings, J. (1972). A trial of the ovulation method of family planning in Tonga. Lancet, 2, 813CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dorairaj, K. (1981). The modified mucus method of family planning. Bul. Nat. Fam. Plann. Assoc. India, 4, 1Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    All India Documentation and Evaluation Report (1981). Natural Family Planning in India. ( New Delhi: Indo-German Social Service Society )Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Billings, E. and Westmore, A. (1980). The Billings Method, p. 70. ( Victoria, Australia: Anne O’Donovan Pty )Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    WHO Task Force on Methods for the Determination of the Fertile Period (1983). A prospective multicentre trial of the ovulation method. IV. The outcome of pregnancies with particular reference to the sex of offspring and the occurrence of spontaneous abortions and congenital malformations. Fertil. Steril (In press)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    World Health Organization (1975–1982). Fourth-Eleventh Annual Reports, Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction. (Geneva: WHO)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    WHO Task Force on Methods for the Determination of the Fertile Period (1982). The measurement of urinary steroid glucuronides as indices of the fertile period in women. J. Steroid Biochem., 17, 695CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    WHO Task Force on Methods for the Determination of the Fertile Period (1983). Temporal relationships between indices of the fertile period. Fertil. Steril., 39, 647Google Scholar

Copyright information

© MTP Press Limited 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. M. Spieler

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations