Skip to main content
  • 87 Accesses

Abstract

The discussion on the nation, still proceeding today, commenced with Renan. To this romantic author of Qu’est-ce q’une nation? the nation was a spiritual essence or principle whose leading thread is the commonly inherited memory, the destiny of the community and its will to survive.1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. E. Renan, Qu’est-ce qi’une nation, Paris, 1882. It should be noted that the background of the study was the severance of Alsace and Lorrain from France after the war of 1870–71.

    Google Scholar 

  2. J. J. Wiatr, Problematyka narodu z perspektywy nauk politycznych, report at the all-Polish Political Science Conference, Dec. 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  3. This approximates the position of H. Kohn, The Idea of Nationalism, New York, 1960, p. 166.

    Google Scholar 

  4. B. Akzin, State and Nation, London, 1964, p. 95.

    Google Scholar 

  5. H. Kohn, op. cit., p. 15; N. Kolesnickij, Ob etnicheskomigosudarstvennom razvitiyi sredneekovey Germanii VI-XIV vv., Srednive veka 1063, nr. 23, and in Polish literature: J. Bardach, О powstaniu nowoczesnego narodu litewskiego, (Emergence of the Modern Lithuanian Nation), Kwartalnik Historyczny, LXXXIII, vol. 2, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  6. R. Aron, Paix et Guerre entre les nations, Paris, 1962, p. 297.

    Google Scholar 

  7. From that point of view Pope Alexander VI’s delimitation of the Spanish and Portuguese possessions approximately in 1493 may be considered the progenitor of today’s Brazil.

    Google Scholar 

  8. B. Akzin, op. cit., p. 107.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Naród i panstwo (Nation and State), Kultura i Spoleczenstwo, vol XII, 3, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Marxism and the National Question, J. V. Stalin, Works, Foreign Languages Publishing House, Moscow, 1953, vol. 2, p. 307.

    Google Scholar 

  11. This is confirmed by the often cited classical examples of Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  12. H. C. J. Dnijker and N. H. Frijda, National Character and National Stereotypes, series „Confluence“, Amsterdam, 1960, p. 36. F. Hertz notes the influence of parliament on the shaping of national unity in England, France and Germany. Nationality in History and Politics, London, 1945, p. 211 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  13. E. Barker, National Character, London, 1927, p. 19.

    Google Scholar 

  14. On this topic see R. Schlesinger, Federalism in Central and Eastern Europe, London, 1945, ch. IX.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Proudhon who dealt with the question of federalism many times in his writings devoted a special study to it entitled Du principe fédératif.

    Google Scholar 

  16. It is characteristic that the Parisian Communards who were disciples of Proudhon called themselves „federalists“.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Karl Marx-Friedrich Engels, Briefwechsel, Berlin, 1950, vol. 3, p. 525.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Engels in The Critique of the Erfurt Programme declares his opposition to the „Swisse-rization“ of Germany, i.e., her federalization. He regards it permissible to introduce that form in Great Britain where “ four nations inhabit two islands“, hence turning it into a multi-national state.

    Google Scholar 

  19. J. V. Stalin, Works, (Pol.) op. cit., vol. 3, pp. 25–33.

    Google Scholar 

  20. On the reversal of the position of the Bolshevik Party on the question of federalism see W. Suchecki, Geneza federalismu radzieckiego (The Origin of Soviet Federalism), Warszawa, 1961, ch. II.

    Google Scholar 

  21. S. Ehrlich, Ustroj Zwiazku Radzieckiego (The Social System of the Soviet Union), Warszawa, 1954, p. 171ff.

    Google Scholar 

  22. M. Weiner, The Politics of Scarcity, Public Pressure and Political Response in India, Chicago, 1962, pp. 34, 58, 208, 231.

    Google Scholar 

  23. The Belgian federalists aim to establish a two-member Flemish-Walloon federation.

    Google Scholar 

  24. C. J. Friedrich calls attention to the difficulty of introducing such a differentiation in Constitutional Government and Democracy. Theory and Practice in Europe and America, New York-London, 1950, p. 190. See also his report at the Oxford Round Table Conference: Federalism, National and International in Theory and Practice, 1963 (mimeographed) in which federalism is treated as a dynamic process. M. Duverger sees only a difference in degree between decentralization and federation. See his Droit constitutionnel et institutions politiques, Paris, 1955, p. 74.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Klaus von Beyme

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1971 Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, Netherlands

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ehrlich, S. (1971). State and Nation. In: von Beyme, K. (eds) Theory and Politics / Theorie und Politik. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-1063-9_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-1063-9_24

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-015-0429-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-1063-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics