Abstract

Henry Longueville Mansel published his Bampton Lectures in 1858, twenty-seven years after Hegel’s death and twelve years before the publication of Ritschl’s Rechtfertigung und Versoehnung. The timing is significant. As a sweeping critique of liberalism, frequently symbolized by the work of Hegel, the lectures react to the slow but inexorable permeation of English religious thought by German ways of thinking. By 1858, the process was sufficiently widespread that Mansel felt justified in devoting the principal portion of his work to the attack. Ritschl marks the effective end of Hegel’s direct influence on theology and a return to a more Kantian mode of thinking. His gambit had already been made, for Mansel is in many ways a more cautious version of Ritschl. Mansel, however, wrote in English and had the misfortune to say what he did at the beginning of a movement so strong that it allowed no qualification. Thus Mansel’s thought was rarely accepted.

Keywords

Historical Method Religious Knowledge Religious Thought Ultimate Factor Religious Matter 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Earl of Carnarvon, “Introduction,” Mansel: The Gnostic Heresies of the First and Second Centuries (London: John Murray, 1875), p. x.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Quoted in Arthur Michael Ramsey, F. D. Maurice (Cambridge: University Press, 1951), p. 72.Google Scholar
  3. 5.
    Leslie Stephen, The English Utilitarians, III (London: Duckworth and Co., 1912), p. 432, (first published in 1900).Google Scholar
  4. 6.
    B. M. G. Reardon, Religious Thought in the Nineteenth Century (Cambridge: University Press, 1966), p. 288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 7.
    W. R. Matthews, The Religious Philosophy of Dean Mansel (London: Oxford University Press, 1956), p. 5.Google Scholar
  6. 9.
    John Herman Randall, Jr., The Role of Knowledge in Western Religion (Boston: Starr King Press, 1958), pp. 1–14.Google Scholar
  7. 10.
    Edwyn Bevan, Symbolism and Belief (Boston: Beacon Press, 1957), p. 337.Google Scholar
  8. 11.
    Henry Mansel, The Limits of Religious Thought (5th ed., London: John Murray, 1867), p. 127.Google Scholar
  9. 12.
    Dietrich Bonhoeffer, Letters and Papers from Prison (New York: Macmillan Paperbacks, 1953), p. 198.Google Scholar
  10. 14.
    Mansel’s various articles were collected after his death in the volume Letters, Lectures, and Reviews, ed. Henry W. Chandler (London: John Murray, 1873).Google Scholar
  11. 15.
    John William Burgon, Lives of Twelve Good Men, II (New York: Scribner & Welford, 1888), p. 184.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, Netherlands 1969

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kenneth D. Freeman

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations